Advertisement

Selection of a virtual organization coordinator

  • A. A. Pereira-Klen
  • E. R. Klen
  • L. Loss
  • J. A. Crispim
  • J. P. Sousa

Collaborative Networks (CNs) have created new needs from technological, organizational and human viewpoints in terms of models, methodologies, methods and work techniques, as well as in what concerns the involved resources – mainly the human ones. The modeling example presented in this work analyses the process of searching and selecting an individual to act as coordinator in an environment that results from this new business model. The example is also meant to support decision-making – ‘what to do’ and ‘how to do’ in order to guide an oriented search for individual competences to achieve an adequate management for a Virtual Organization (VO) that is being created or that has recently been created.

Keywords

Virtual Organization Collaborative Network Virtual Enterprise Partner Selection Individual Competence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Araz C., Ozfirat M.P. and Ozkarahan I. An integrated multicriteria decision-making methodology for outsourcing management. Computers & Operations Research, 34 (2007), 3738 - 3756.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Camarinha-Matos, L.M., Afsarmanesh, H., Ollus, M. A Holistic Approach to Creation and Management of Dynamic Virtual Organizations, In: Collaborative Networks and their Breeding Environments. ISBN 0-387-28259-9. Springer, (2005).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Crispim, J. and Sousa, J.P. Multiple criteria partner selection in virtual enterprises. In Camarinha Matos, L.M., Afsarmanesh, H., Novais, P. and Analide, C., eds. IFIP International Federation for Information Processing. Establishing the Foundation of Collaborative Networks. Boston, MA, Springer. 243 (2007), 197-206.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dotoli M., Fanti M. P., Meloni C. and Zhou M. C. Design and Optimization of Integrated E-Supply Chain for Agile and Environmentally Conscious Manufacturing. IEEE transactions on systems, man, and cybernetics—part a: systems and humans, 36, 1 (2006), 62-75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Durand, T. Strategizing for innovation: competence analysis in assessing strategic change. In: Competence-based strategic management. Edited by Ron Sanchez and Aimé Heene. Chichester, : EnglandJohn Wiley & Sons, (1997).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Durand, T. Forms of incompetence. In: Fourth International Conference on Competence-Based Management. Oslo: Norwegian Scholl of Management, (1998).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Figueira, J., Greco, S., Ehrgott, M. (eds). “Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys”.Springer, New York (USA), 2005.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fleury, A., Fleury, M.T.L. Estratégias Empresariais e Formação de Competências - Um Quebra-cabeça Caleidoscópico da Indústria Brasileira. ISBN 85-224-3807-2. 3a ed. Editora Atlas, (2004), in Portuguese.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gao F., Cui G., Zhao Q. and Liu H. Application of Improved Discrete Particle Swarm Algorithm in Partner Selection of Virtual Enterprise. IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 6, 3A, (2006) 208-212.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Herrera F., Martiınez L., Sanchez P.J. Decision Aiding Managing non-homogeneous information in group decision making. European Journal of Operational Research 166, 1 (2004), 115-132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hwang C.L., Yoon K. “Multiple attribute decision making: Methods and applications”. Springer, Berlin, 1981.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jahanshahloo G.R. a, Hosseinzadeh Lotfi F., Izadikhah M. Extension of the TOPSIS method for decision-making problems with fuzzy data. Applied Mathematics and Computation 181 (2006) 1544-1551.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kim T-Y, Lee S., Kim K. and Kim C-H. A modeling framework for agile and interoperable virtual enterprises. Computers in Industry 57 (2006), 204-217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kim K-J. and Ahn H. A recommender system using GA K-means clustering in an online shopping market. Expert Systems with Applications, 34, 2 (2008), 1200-1209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Klen, E.R. Methodology for Virtual Organizations Managers Search and Suggestion based on Individual Competences. Florianópolis, (2007), 216p. Ph.D Thesis - Post-Graduate Program in Production and Systems Engineering, UFSC, Florianópolis - SC, Brazil (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Li Y., Liao X. Decision support for risk analysis on dynamic alliance. Decision Support Systems 42 (2007) 2043- 2059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lin H-Y., Hsu P-Y., Sheen G-J. A fuzzy-based decision-making procedure for data warehouse system selection. Expert Systems with Applications 32 (2007), 939-953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Liu F., Ding F.Y., Lall V. Using data envelopment analysis to compare suppliers for supplier selection and performance improvement, Supply Chain Management 5, 3 (2000) 143-150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ng W. L. An efficient and simple model for multiple criteria supplier selection problem. European Journal of Operational Research 186, 3 (2008), 1059-1067.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Olafsson S., Li X., Wu S. Operations research and data mining. European Journal of Operational Research, 187, 3 (2008), 1429-1448.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Samoilenko S. and Osei-Bryson K-M. Increasing the discriminatory power of DEA in the presence of the sample heterogeneity with cluster analysis and decision trees. Expert Systems with Applications, 34, 2 (2008), 1568-1581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sari B., Sen T. and Kilic S. E. AHP model for the selection of partner companies in virtual enterprises. International Journal of Advance Manufacturing Technology. (2007) DOI 10.1007/s00170-007-1097-6.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sha D.Y. and Che Z.H. Virtual integration with a multi-criteria partner selection model for the multiechelon manufacturing system. International Journal of Advance Manufacturing Technology, 25 (2005), 793-802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Timmerman E. An approach to vendor performance evaluation. Journal of Purchasing and Materials Management 22, 4 (1986), 2-8.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Toney, F. “The Superior Project Manager: Global Competency Standards and Best Practices”. Marcel Dekker publisher, New York, USA, 2002.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Xu S., Shen L., Zhai J., Yang Z. and Li Y. Research on Virtual Logistic Enterprises Partners Selection Method Based on CLIQUE. 10th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design, May 2006, 1 - 5.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. A. Pereira-Klen
  • E. R. Klen
  • L. Loss
  • J. A. Crispim
  • J. P. Sousa

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations