Networked partner selection with robust portfolio modeling

  • T. Jarimo
  • K. Korpiaho

This chapter illustrates the applicability of mathematical decision-analysis in VO partner selection. The approach allows for multiple criteria, which can also relate to inter-organizational issues such as collaboration history between partner candidates. Moreover, the approach is soft in the sense that it allows interval parameter data, instead of point estimates. Using the RPM method, Pareto-efficient VO configurations can be identified and the robustness of the candidates can be analyzed. The results suggest that the models are very useful in practical decision-making situations.


Analytic Hierarchy Process Virtual Organization Collaborative Network Virtual Enterprise Partner Selection 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Arbel A., 1989. Approximate articulation of preference and priority derivation. European Journal of Operational Research 43, 317-26.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baldo, F., Rabelo, R. J., Vallejos, R. V., 2007. An Ontology-Based Approach For Selecting Performance Indicators For Partners Suggestion. In: Camarinha-Matos, L. M., Afsarmanesh, H., Novais, P., Analide, C. (Eds.), IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, Volume 243, Establishing The Foundation Of Collaborative Networks, Springer, 187-196.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barron, F. H., Edwards, W., 1994. SMARTS and SMARTER: Improved simple methods for multiattribute utility measurement. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 60 (3), 306-325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Camarinha-Matos, L. M., Afsarmanesh, H., 2003. Elements of a base VE infrastructure. Computers in Industry 51, 139-163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Crispim, J., A., Sousa, J., P, 2005. A Multi-criteria Decision Support System for the Formation of Collaborative Networks of Enterprises. In: Camarinha-Matos, L. M., Afsarmanesh, H., Ortiz, A. (Eds.), IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, Volume 186, Collaborative Networks and their Breeding Environments, Springer, 143-154.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dyer, J. S., 1990. Remarks on the analytic hierarchy process. Management Science 36 (3), 249-258.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Edwards, W., 1977. How to use multiattribute utility measurement for social decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 7 (5), 326-340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hamel, G., Prahalad, C. K., 1990. The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review 68 (3), 79-91.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ip, W. H., Huang, M., Yung, K. L., Wang, D., 2003. Genetic algorithm solution for a risk-based partner selection problem in a virtual enterprise. Computers & Operations Research 30, 213-231.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jarillo, J. C., 1988. On strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal 9 (1), 31-41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jarimo, T., Salkari, I., Bollhalter, S., 2006. Partner Selection with Network Interdependencies: An Application. In: Camarinha-Matos, L. M., Afsarmanesh, H., Ollus, M. (Eds.), IFIP International Federation for Information Processing, Volume 224, Network-Centric Collaboration and Supporting Frameworks, Springer, 389-396.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Keeney, R. L., Raiffa, H., 1976. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Land, A. H. and Doig, A. G. 1960. An Automatic Method for Solving Discrete Programming Problems. Econometrica 28, 497-520.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Li, Y., Liao, X., 2007. Decision support for risk analysis on dynamic alliance. Decision Support Systems 42 (4), 2043-2059.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liesiö, J., Mild, P., Salo, A., 2007. Preference Programming for Robust Portfolio Modeling and Project Selection. European Journal of Operational Research 181 (3), 1488-1505.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Meade, L. M., Liles, D. H., Sarkis, J., 1997. Justifying strategic alliances and partnering: a prerequisite for virtual enterprising. Omega 25 (1), 29-42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mikhailov L., 2000. A fuzzy programming method for deriving priorities in the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Journal of the Operational Research Society 51, 341-9.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mikhailov, L., 2002. Fuzzy analytical approach to partnership selection in formation of virtual enterprises. Omega 30, 393-401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Saaty, T. L., 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York.MATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Saaty, T. L., 2005. Making and validating complex decisions with the ahp/anp. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering 14 (1), 1-36.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Salo, A., Punkka, A., 2005. Rank Inclusion in Criteria Hierarchies. European Journal of Operational Research 163 (2), 338-356.MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Steuer, R. E. 1976. Multiple Objective Linear Programming with Interval Criterion Weights. Management Science 23 (3), 305-316.MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Stummer, C., Heidenberger, K., 2003. Interactive R&D Portfolio Analysis With Project Interdependencies and Time Profiles of Multiple Objectives. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 50 (2), 175-183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Williamson, O. E., 1975. Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    von Winterfeldt, D., Edwards, W., 1986. Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Jarimo
  • K. Korpiaho

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations