Lessons for the Clinical Implant

  • Mark W. Kroll
  • Charles D. Swerdlow

Our goal in this chapter is to provide a practical review for clinicians of how our under standing of defibrillation scientific results can help with their clinical practice. Some of the typical implant practices are found to be driven by dogma and not by science.


Right Ventricle Superior Vena Cava Phase Duration Pathway Resistance Membrane Time Constant 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Denman RA, Umesan C, Martin PT, Forbes RN, Kroll MW, Anskey EJ, Burnett HE. Benefit of millisecond waveform durations for patients with high defibrillation thresholds. Heart Rhythm2006;3:536–541PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    White JB, Walcott GP, Wayland JL Jr, Smith WM, Ideker RE. Predicting the relative efficacy of shock waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation in dogs. Ann Emerg Med1999;34:309–320PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mehdirad AA, Love CJ, Stanton MS, Strickberger SA, Duncan JL, Kroll MW. Pre liminary clinical results of a biphasic waveform and an RV lead system. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol1999;22:594–599PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schauerte P, Schondube FA, Grossmann M, Dorge H, Stein F, Dohmen B, Moumen A, Erena K, Messmer BJ, Hanrath P, Stellbrink C. Influence of phase duration of biphasic waveforms on defibrillation energy requirements with a 70-microF capacitance. Circulation1998;97:2073–2078PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Walcott GP, Walker RG, Cates AW, Krassowska W, Smith WM, Ideker RE. Choos ing the optimal monophasic and biphasic waveforms for ventricular defibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol1995;6:737–750PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sharma AD, Fain E, O'Neill PG, Skadsen A, Damle R, Baker J, Chauhan V, Mazuz M, Ross T, Zhang Z. Shock on T versus direct current voltage for induction of ven tricular fibrillation: a randomized prospective comparison. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol2004;27:89–94PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mehdirad AA, Stohr EC, Love CJ, Nelson SD, Schaal SF. Implantable defibrillators impedance measurement using pacing pulses versus shock delivery with intact and modified high voltage lead system. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol1999;22:437–441PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pendekanti R, Henriquez C, Tomassoni G, Miner W, Fain E, Hoffmann D, Wolf P. Surface coverage effects on defibrillation impedance for transvenous electrodes. Ann Biomed Eng1997;25:739–746PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Olsovsky MR, Shorofsky SR, Gold MR. The effect of shock configuration and delivered energy on defibrillation impedance. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol1999;22:165–168PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Weiss DN, Shorofsky SR, Peters RW, Gold MR. The effect of delivered energy on defibrillation shock impedance. J Interv Card Electrophysiol1998;2:273–277PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kontos MC, Ellenbogen KA, Wood MA, Damiano RJ Jr, Akosah KO, Nixon JV, Stambler BS. Factors associated with elevated impedance with a nonthoracotomy defibrillation lead system. Am J Cardiol1997;79:48–52PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schwartzman D, Hull ML, Callans DJ, Gottlieb CD, Marchlinski FE. Serial defibril lation lead impedance in patients with epicardial and nonthoracotomy lead systems. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol1996;7:697–703PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Iskos D, Lock K, Lurie KG, Fahy GJ, Petersen-Stejskal S, Benditt DG. Submuscular versus subcutaneous pectoral implantation of cardioverter-defibrillators: effect on high voltage pathway impedance and defibrillation efficacy. J Interv Card Electrophysiol1998;2:47–52PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Swerdlow C, Kass R, Hwang C, Gang E, Chen P, Peter C. Effect of voltage and respiration on impedance in nonthoracotomy defibrillation pathways. Am J Cardiol1994;73:688–692PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Prevost J, Batelli F. Quelques effets des decharges electriques sur le coeur des mam-miferes. J Phys Pathol Gen1900;2:40:52Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Peleska B. [Transthoracic and direct defibrillation]. Rozhl Chir1957;36:731–755PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Schuder J, Stoeckle H, JAW. Transthoracic ventricular defibrillation in the dog with truncated exponential stimuli. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng BME1971;18:410–415Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Feeser S, Tang A, Kavanagh K, Rollins D, WM S, Wolf P, Ideker R. Strength-duration and probability of success curves for defibrillation with biphasic waveforms. Circulation1990;82:2128–2141PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dixon EG, Tang AS, Wolf PD, Meador JT, Fine MJ, Calfee RV, Ideker RE. Improved defibrillation thresholds with large contoured epicardial electrodes and biphasic wave forms. Circulation1987;76:1176–1184PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tang A, Yabe S, Wharton J, Dolker M, Smith W, Ideker R. Ventricular defibrillation using biphasic waveforms: the importance of phasic defibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol1989;13:207–214PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Peekema, RM, Beesley, JP. Factors affecting the impedence of foil-type electrolytic capacitors. Electrochem. Technol.1968;6:166Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Malkin RA, Guan D, Wikswo JP. Experimental evidence of improved transtho racic defibrillation with electroporation-enhancing pulses. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng2006;53:1901–1910PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Blair H. On the intensity-time relations for stimulation by electric currents, I. J Gen Physiol1932;15:709–729Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Blair H. On the intensity-time relations for stimulation by electric currents, II. J Gen Physiol1932;15:731–755Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Seidl K, Denman R, JC M, Mouchawar G, Stoeppler C, Becker T, Weise U, Anskey E, Burnett H, Kroll M. Stepped defibrillation waveform is substantially more efficient than the 50/50% tilt biphasic. Heart Rhythm2006;3(12):1406–1411PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cleland B. A conceptual basis for defibrillation waveforms. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol1996;19:1186–1195PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fishler MG. Theoretical predictions of the optimal monophasic and biphasic defibril lation waveshapes. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng2000;47:59–67PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kroll MW. A minimal model of the monophasic defibrillation pulse. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol1993;16:769–777PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kroll MW. A minimal model of the single capacitor biphasic defibrillation waveform. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol1994;17:1782–1792PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Swerdlow C, Fan W, Brewer J. Charge-burping theory correctly predicts optimal ratios of phase duration for biphasic defibrillation waveforms. Circulation1996;94:2278–2284PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Dillon SM, Kwaku KF. Progressive depolarization: a unified hypothesis for defibril lation and fibrillation induction by shocks. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol1998;9:529– 552PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Chen P-S, Wolf PD, Ideker RE. The mechanism of cardiac defibrillation: a different point of view. Circulation1991;84:913–919PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Cheng Y, Mowrey KA, Van Wagoner DR, Tchou PJ, Efimov IR. Virtual electrode induced reexcitation: a mechanism of defibrillation. Circ Res1999;85:1056–1066PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Efimov IR, Cheng Y, Yamanouchi Y, Tchou PJ. Direct evidence of the role of virtual electrode-induced phase singularity in success and failure of defibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol2000;11:861–868PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Hodgkin A. The subthreshold potentials in a crustacean nerve fiber. Proc R Soc Lond B1938;126:87–121Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kao CY, Hoffman BF. Graded and decremental response in heart muscle fibers. Am J Physiol1958;194:187–196PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Krassowska W, Cabo C, Knisley SB, Ideker RE. Propagation versus delayed activation during field stimulation of cardiac muscle. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol1992;15:197–210PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Tovar O, Tung L. Electroporation of cardiac cell membranes with monophasic or biphasic rectangular pulses. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol1991;14:1887–1892PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Jones JL, Jones RE. Improved defibrillator waveform safety factor with biphasic waveforms. Am J Physiol1983;245:H60–H65PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Jones JL, Jones RE. Decreased defibrillator-induced dysfunction with biphasic rectan gular waveforms. Am J Physiol1984;247:H792–H796PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Anderson C, Trayanova N, Skouibine K. Termination of spiral waves with biphasic shocks: role of virtual electrode polarization. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol2000;11:1386– 1396PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Behrens S, Li C, Kirchhof P, Fabritz FL, Franz MR. Reduced arrhythmogenicity of biphasic versus monophasic T-wave shocks. Implications for defibrillation efficacy. Circulation1996;94:1974–1980PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Efimov IR, Cheng Y, Van Wagoner DR, Mazgalev T, Tchou PJ. Virtual electrode induced phase singularity: a basic mechanism of defibrillation failure. Circ Res1998;82:918–925PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Efimov IR, Cheng YN, Biermann M, Van Wagoner DR, Mazgalev TN, Tchou PJ. Transmembrane voltage changes produced by real and virtual electrodes during monophasic defibrillation shock delivered by an implantable electrode. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol1997;8:1031–1045PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Schauerte PN, Ziegert K, Waldmann M, Schondube FA, Birkenhauer F, Mischke K, Grossmann M, Hanrath P, Stellbrink C. Effect of biphasic shock duration on defib rillation threshold with different electrode configurations and phase 2 capacitances: prediction by upper-limit-of-vulnerability determination. Circulation1999;99:1516– 1522PubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Mouchawar G, Kroll M, Val-Mejias JE, Schwartzman D, McKenzie J, Fitzgerald D, Prater S, Katcher M, Fain E, Syed Z. ICD waveform optimization: a randomized, prospective, pair-sampled multicenter study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol2000;23:1992– 1995PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Shorofsky SR, Rashba E, Havel W, Belk P, Degroot P, Swerdlow C, Gold MR. Improved defibrillation efficacy with an ascending ramp waveform in humans. Heart Rhythm2005;2:388–394PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Kroll M, Lehmann M, Tchou P. Defining the defibrillation dosage. In: Kroll M, Lehmann M, eds. Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Therapy: The Engineering-Clinical Interface. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic; 1996:63–88Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Hillsley R, Walker R, Swanson D, Rollins D, Wolf P, Ideker R. Is the second phase of a biphasic waveform the defibrillating phase? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol1993;16:1402– 1411Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Hoorweg J. Condensatorentladung und Auseinanderetzung mit du Bois-Reymond. Pfugers Arch1892;52:87–108Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Weiss G. Sur la possibilite' de rendre comparable entre eux les appareils survant a l'excitation electrique. Arch Ital de Biol1901;35:413–446Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Bourland JD, Tacker WA, Geddes LA. Strength duration curves for trapezoidal wave forms of various tilts for transchest defibrillation in animals. Med Instrum1978;12:38– 41PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Gold J, Schuder J, Stoeckle H, Granberg T, Hamdani S, Rychlewski J. Transthoracic ventricular defibrillation in the 100 kg calf with unidirectional rectangular pulses. Circulation1977;56:745PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Wessale J, Bourland J, Tacker W, Geddes L. Bipolar catheter defibrillation in dogs using trapezoidal waveforms of various tilts. J Electocardiol1980;13:359–366Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Geddes LA, Niebauer MJ, Babbs CF, Bourland JD. Fundamental criteria underlying the efficacy and safety of defibrillating current waveforms. Med Biol Eng Comput1985;23:122–130PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Niebauer MJ, Babbs CF, Geddes LA, Bourland JD. Efficacy and safety of defibrillation with rectangular waves of 2- to 20-milliseconds duration. Crit Care Med1983;11:95–98PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Swerdlow CD, Brewer JE, Kass RM, Kroll MW. Application of models of defibrillation to human defibrillation data: implications for optimizing implantable defibrillator capacitance. Circulation1997;96:2813–2822PubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Shorofsky S, Rashba E, DeGroot P, Havel W, Mugglin A, Gold M. Is the membrane time constant for defibrillation independent of the waveform? Pacing Clin Electrophys iol2002;24:620 (abstract)Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Gold MR, Shorofsky SR. Strength-duration relationship for human transvenous defib rillation. Circulation1997;96:3517–3520PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Mouchawar GA, Geddes LA, Bourland JD. Ability of the Lapicque and Blair strength duration curves to fit experimentally obtained data from the dog heart. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng1989;36:971–974PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Hahn S, Heil J, Lin Y, Derfus D, Lang D. Improved defibrillation with small capacitance and optimized biphasic waveforms. Circulation1994;90:I–175Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Jung W, Moosdorf R, Korte T, Wolpert C, Spehl S, Bauer T, Manz M. Effect of capacitance on the defibrillation threshold in patients using a new unipolar defibrilla tion system. Circulation1994;90(4):I–229Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Rist K, Tchou PJ, Mowrey K, Kroll MW, Brewer JE. Smaller capacitors improve the biphasic waveform. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol1994;5:771–776PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Leonelli FM, Kroll MW, Brewer JE. Defibrillation thresholds are lower with smaller storage capacitors. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol1995;18:1661–1665PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Swerdlow CD, Brewer JE, Kass RM, Kroll M. Estimation of optimal ICD capacitance from human strength-duration data. J Am Coll Cardiol1997;96(9):2813–2822Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Swerdlow C, Kass R, Hwang C, Chen P-S, Raissi S. Effect of capacitor size and pathway resistance on defibrillation threshold for implantable defibrillators. Circulation1994;90:1840–1846PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Sticherling C, Klingenheben T, Cameron D, Hohnloser SH. Worldwide clinical expe rience with a down-sized active can implantable cardioverter defibrillator in 162 consecutive patients. Worldwide 7221 ICD Investigators. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol1998;21:1778–1783PubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Thammanomai A, Sweeney M, Eisenberg S. A comparison of the output character istics of several implantable cardioverter defibrillators. Heart Rhythm2006;3:1053– 1059PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Yamanouchi Y, Brewer JE, Mowrey KA, Donohoo AM, Wilkoff BL, Tchou PJ. Optimal small-capacitor biphasic waveform for external defibrillation: influence of phase-1 tilt and phase-2 voltage. Circulation1998;98:2487–2493PubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Malkin RA. Large sample test of defibrillation waveform sensitivity. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol2002;13:361–370PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Cheng Y, Mowrey KA, Nikolski V, Tchou PJ, Efimov IR. Mechanisms of shock-induced arrhythmogenesis during acute global ischemia. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol2002;282:H2141–H2151PubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Natarajan S, Henthorn R, Burroughs J, Esberg D, Zweibel S, Ross T, Kroll M, Gianola D, Oza A. Fixed duration “tuned” defibrillation waveforms outperform fixed 50/50% tilt defibrillation waveforms: a randomized, prospective, pair-sampled multicenter study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol2007;30:S139–S142PubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Sweeney MO, Natale A, Volosin KJ, Swerdlow CD, Baker JH, Degroot P. Prospec tive randomized comparison of 50%/50% versus 65%/65% tilt biphasic waveform on defibrillation in humans. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol2001;24:60–65PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Strickberger SA, Hummel JD, Horwood LE, Jentzer J, Daoud E, Niebauer M, Bakr O, Man KC, Williamson BD, Kou W, et al. Effect of shock polarity on ventricular defib rillation threshold using a transvenous lead system. J Am Coll Cardiol1994;24:1069– 1072PubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    O'Neill PG, Boahene KA, Lawrie GM, Harvill LF, Pacifico A. The automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator: effect of patch polarity on defibrillation thresh old. J Am Coll Cardiol1991;17:707–711PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Bardy GH, Ivey TD, Allen MD, Johnson G, Greene HL. Evaluation of electrode polarity on defibrillation efficacy. Am J Cardiol1989;63:433–437PubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Kroll MW, Efimov IR, Tchou PJ. Present understanding of shock polarity for internal defibrillation: the obvious and non-obvious clinical implications. Pacing Clin Electro physiol2006;29:885–891Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Swerdlow C, Ahern T, Chen P-S. Comparative reproducibility of defibrillation thresh old and upper limit of vulnerability. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol1996;19:2103–2111PubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Yamanouchi Y, Cheng Y, Tchou PJ, Efimov IR. The mechanisms of the vulnerable window: the role of virtual electrodes and shock polarity. Can J Physiol Pharmacol2001;79:25–33PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Strickberger SA, Daoud E, Goyal R, Chan KK, Bogun F, Castellani M, Harvey M, Horwood LE, Niebauer M, Man KC, Morady F. Prospective randomized comparison of anodal monophasic shocks versus biphasic cathodal shocks on defibrillation energy requirements. Am Heart J1996;131:961–965PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Mowrey KA, Cheng Y, Tchou PJ, Efimov R. Kinetics of defibrillation shock induced response: design implications for the optimal defibrillation waveform. Europace2002;4:27–39PubMedGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Tomassoni G, Newby K, Deshpande S, Axtell K, Sra J, Akhtar M, Natale A. Defibril lation efficacy of commercially available biphasic impulses in humans. Importance of negative-phase peak voltage. Circulation1997;95:1822–1826PubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Swerdlow CD. ICD waveforms: what really matters? Heart Rhythm2006;3:1060–1062PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Peleska B. Cardiac arrhythmias following condenser discharges and their dependence upon strength of current and phase of cardiac cycle. Circ Res1963;13:21–32PubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Nikolski VP, Efimov IR. Electroporation of the heart. Europace2005;7(Suppl 2):146– 154PubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Jones DL, Klein GJ, Guiraudon GM, Sharma AD, Kallok MJ, Bourland JD, Tacker WA. Internal cardiac defibrillation in man: pronounced improvement with sequential pulse delivery to two different lead orientations. Circulation1986;73:484–491PubMedGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Russo AM, Sauer W, Gerstenfeld EP, Hsia HH, Lin D, Cooper JM, Dixit S, Verdino RJ, Nayak HM, Callans DJ, Patel V, Marchlinski FE. Defibrillation threshold testing: is it really necessary at the time of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator insertion? Heart Rhythm2005;2:456–461PubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Shukla HH, Flaker GC, Jayam V, Roberts D. High defibrillation thresholds in transve nous biphasic implantable defibrillators: clinical predictors and prognostic implications. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol2003;26:44–48PubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Anderson KP. Sudden cardiac death unresponsive to implantable defibrillator therapy: an urgent target for clinicians, industry and government. J Interv Card Electrophysiol2005;14:71–78PubMedGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Mitchell LB, Pineda EA, Titus JL, Bartosch PM, Benditt DG. Sudden death in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators: the importance of post-shock electromechanical dissociation. J Am Coll Cardiol2002;39:1323–1328PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Poole J, Johnson G, Callans D, Raitt M, Yee R, Reddy R, Wilber D, Guarnieri T, Talajic M, Marchlinski F, Lee K, Bardy G, Investigators S-H. Analysis of implantable defibrillator shock electrograms in the Sudden Cardiac Death-Heart Failure Trial. Heart Rhythm2004;1:S178 (abstract)Google Scholar
  92. 92.
    Tokano T, Bach D, Chang J, Davis J, Souza JJ, Zivin A, Knight BP, Goyal R, Man KC, Morady F, Strickberger SA. Effect of ventricular shock strength on cardiac hemodynamics. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol1998;9:791–797PubMedGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Holmes H, Bourland J, Tacker W Jr, Geddes L. Hemodynamic responses to two defibrillating trapezoidal waveforms. Med Instrumen1980;14:47–50Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    Boriani G, Biffi M, Silvestri P, Martignani C, Valzania C, Diemberger I, Moulder C, Mouchawar G, Kroll M, Branzi A. Mechanisms of pain associated with internal defibrillation shocks: results of a randomized study of shock waveform. Heart Rhythm2005;2:708–713PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Boriani G, Kroll M, Biffi M, Silvestri P, Martignani C, Valzania C, Diemberger I, Moulder C, Mouchawar G, Branzi A. Plateau waveform shape allows a higher patient shock energy tolerance. Heart Rhythm2006;3:S13Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Gold M, Val-Mejias J, Leman R, Tummala R, Goyal S, Kluger J, Kroll M, Oza A. Effect of SVC coil usage and SVC electrode spacing on defibrillation thresholds. Circulation2006;114:II–690Google Scholar
  97. 97.
    Gold MR, Olsovsky MR, DeGroot PJ, Cuello C, Shorofsky SR. Optimization of transvenous coil position for active can defibrillation thresholds. J Cardiovasc Elec trophysiol2000;11:25–29Google Scholar
  98. 98.
    Gold MR, Foster AH, Shorofsky SR. Lead system optimization for transvenous defib rillation. Am J Cardiol1997;80:1163–1167PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Gold MR, Olsovsky MR, Pelini MA, Peters RW, Shorofsky SR. Comparison of single- and dual-coil active pectoral defibrillation lead systems. J Am Coll Cardiol1998;31:1391–1394PubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Libero L, Lozano IF, Bocchiardo M, Marcolongo M, Sallusti L, Madrid A, Gaita F, Trevi GP. Comparison of defibrillation thresholds using monodirectional electrical vector versus bidirectional electrical vector. Ital Heart J2001;2:449–455PubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Gold M, Val-Mejias J, Leman R, Tummala R, Goyal S, Kluger J, Kroll M, Oza A. What is the optimal SVC coil usage in ICD patients? Results from a randomized, prospective multicenter study. Heart Rhythm2008;5(3):394–349PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mark W. Kroll
    • Charles D. Swerdlow
      • 1
    1. 1.Division of Cardiology, Department of MedicineCedars-Sinai Medical CenterLos AngelesUSA

    Personalised recommendations