Multielectrode Mapping of the Heart

  • Edward J. Berbari
  • Haris Sih

Multielectrode cardiac mapping has at least a 50-year history in cardiac research, and the development of this methodology has closely followed the technological advances in instrumentation and computing. The methodology has proven to be quite effective in characterizing potential distributions on both the body surface and the epicardial surface of the heart.1–4 However, the more challenging problem for multielectrode systems is the identification and display of cardiac activation or isochronal maps. In the earlier era of cardiac mapping, hardware limitations, particularly the speed of computer processing and digital data acquisition, were the major challenges for obtaining continuous data from a high number of recording channels. For the current generation of digital electronics and computers this is no longer a significant challenge. The analysis and interpretation of the data still pose a number of challenges, since in many cases, such as diseased myocardium or during complex tachyarrhythmias, the biophysical basis of conduction is not fully developed. For example, the use of contour-generation software often does not consider the actual nature of the underlying pathophysiology. Many standard interpolation algorithms will indeed create contours overlying scar tissue within infarcted regions. This is an inherent error.

A number of newer mapping approaches rely on mathematical models to create images based on data at some distance from the actual sources. In some cases these systems are proprietary and may have indeed conquered some long-standing problems. In other cases, because the systems produce “good looking” images that fit a preconceived model of activation, their underlying models are not challenged. This chapter focuses on the issues surrounding direct contact, multielectrode mapping approaches and will concentrate on the problems associated with producing activation maps, especially from regions surrounding and within infarct regions.


Extracellular Recording Epicardial Surface Microelectrode Recording Contour Generation Epicardial Mapping 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Barr RC, Gallie TM, Spach MS. Automated production of contour maps for electro-physiology: I. Problem definition, solution strategy, and specification of geometric model. Comput Biomed Res 1980;13:142–153PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barr RC, Gallie TM, Spach MS. Automated production of contour maps for electro-physiology: III. Construction of contour maps. Comput Biomed Res 1980;13:171–191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barr RC, Gallie TM, Spach MS. Automated production of contour maps for electrophys-iology: II. Triangulation, verification, and organization of the geometric model. Comput Biomed Res 1980;13:154–170PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Monro DM. Interpolation methods for surface mapping. Comput Programs Biomed 1980;11:145–157PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Berbari EJ, Lander P, Geselowitz DB, Scherlag BJ, Lazzara R. The methodology of cardiac mapping. In: Breithardt G, Borgreffe M, Shenasa M, eds. Cardiac Mapping. Armonk, NY: Futura; 1993:63–79Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sih H, Berbari EJ. The methodology of cardiac mapping. In: Breithardt G, Borgreffe M, Shenasa M, eds. Cardiac Mapping, 2nd edn. Armonk, NY: Futura; 2003:41–58Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Biermann M, Shenasa M, Borggrefe M, Hindricks G, Haverkamp W, Breithardt G. The interpretation of cardiac electrograms. In: Breithardt G, Borgreffe M, Shenasa M, eds. Cardiac Mapping. Armonk, NY: Futura; 1993:11–34Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Scherlag BJ, El-Sherif N, Hope R, Lazzara R. Characterization and localization of ventricular arrhythmias resulting from myocardial ischemia and infarction. Circ Res 1974;35:372–383PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Geselowitz DB, Smith S, Mowrey K, Berbari EJ. Model studies of extracellular electro-grams arising from an excitation wave propagating in a thin layer. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1991;38:526–531PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Davis JC. Statistics and Data Analysis. New York: Wiley; 1986Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ideker RE, Smith WM, Blanchard SM, Reiser SL, Simpson EV, Wolf PD, Danieley ND. The assumptions of isochronal cardiac mapping. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1989;12:456–478PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ramachandran D, Berbari EJ, Lander P. Comparison of interpolation methods used in epicardial activation map. In: Computers in Cardiology. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press; 1993:129–136Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Krige DG. Two dimensional weighted moving average trend surfaces for ore evaluation. J S Afr Inst Min Metall 1966;13:3815Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Berbari EJ, Lander P, Geselowitz DB. A cardiac mapping system for identifying late potentials: correlation with signal averaged surface recordings. Comput Cardiol 1988:369–372Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Berbari EJ, Lander P, Scherlag BJ, Lazzara R, Geselowitz DB. Ambiguities of epicardial mapping. J Electrocardiol 1992;24(Suppl):16–20PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Edward J. Berbari
    • 1
  • Haris Sih
    • 2
  1. 1.Biomedical Engineering DepartmentIndiana University — Purdue University IndianapolisIndianapolisUSA
  2. 2.Cardiac Surgery DivisionBoston ScientificSt. PaulUSA

Personalised recommendations