Electrofiltration of Biomaterials

  • R. HofmannEmail author
  • T. Käppler
  • C. Posten
Part of the Food Engineering Series book series (FSES)


Solid–liquid separation of biomaterials is still a problem that has not sufficiently been solved on the technical scale. Most biological compounds like cells and biopolymers exhibit comparatively high electrical surface charges. These allow for the application of electrical forces strong enough to overcome hydrodynamical forces. The contribution given here describes an innovative filter chamber, which makes use of this property. In this so-called press electrofiltration, an electrical field is superimposed onto a conventional dead-end filtration with membranes on both sides of the filtration chamber. The electrical field induces an electrophoretic flux of charged biomaterials towards the oppositely charged electrode. Thus, a big filter cake can be built up on the membrane at this side, while dewatering happens at the membrane next to the other electrode. Here only a thin surface layer is formed. One special feature of this newly designed filter chamber is the separation of the electrodes by flushing chambers. These allow for the removal of electrolysis gases, as well as for pH and temperature control. After reviewing the mathematical description of electrofiltration, the chapter highlights the advantages of this approach by describing different application examples. These range from dewatering of biopolymers, namely polysaccharides and proteins, to removal of cells from product up to fractionation of different polymer colloids from each other. Each example is extensively discussed on the basis of given data for model systems and for real fermentation suspensions. It is outlined that press electrofiltration is especially worthwhile for fine, highly charged particles as being present in biosuspensions. One unique selling point is the high final biopolymer concentration, which can be reached. For transfer of these examples to processes in fermentation or food industries useful general guidelines are given at the end of the chapter.


Electric Field Strength Filter Cake Electric Force Anode Side Specific Energy Consumption 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Bargeman G, Houwing J, Recio I, Koops GH, van der Horst C. (2002a) Electro-membrane filtration for the selective isolation of bioactive peptides from an alpha(s2)-casein hydrolysate. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 80, 599–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bargeman G, Koops GH, Houwing J, Breebaart I, van der Horst C, Wesselingh JA. (2002b) The Development of Electro-Membrane Filtration for the Isolation of Valuable Charged Components. Chemie Ingenieur Technik 74, 639–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bargeman G, Koops GH, Houwing J, Breebaart I, van der Horst HC, Wessling M. (2002c) The development of electro-membrane filtration for the isolation of bioactive peptides: the effect of membrane selection and operating parameters on the transport rate. Desalination 149, 369–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bellara SR, Cui ZF, Pepper DS. (1997) Fractionation of BSA and lysozyme using gas-sparged ultrafiltration in hollow fiber membrane modules. Biotechnology Progress 13, 869–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ghosh R. (2003) Protein Bioseparation using ultrafiltration: Theory, Application and New Develpments. Imperial College Press, London.Google Scholar
  6. Ghosh R, Cui ZF. (1998) Fractionation of BSA and lysozyme using ultrafiltration: effect of pH and membrane pretreatment. Journal of Membrane Science 139, 17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ghosh R, Li QY, Cui ZF. (1998) Fractionation of BSA and lysozyme using ultrafiltration: Effect of gas sparging. Aiche Journal 44, 61–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hofmann R. (2005) Prozesstechnische Entwicklung der Presselektrofiltration als innovatives Verfahren zur Abtrennung von Biopolymeren. VDI-Verlage, Düsseldorf.Google Scholar
  9. Hofmann R, Kaeppler T, Posten C. (2006) Pilot-scale press electrofiltration of biopolymers. Separation Purification Technology 51, 303–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hofmann R, Posten, C. (2002) Biopolymer Recovery with Pressure Electrofiltration and Determination of the Biopolymer Quality by MAS-NMR and FT-IR Techniques. Engineering in Life Sciences 2, 304–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hofmann R, Posten C. (2003) Improvement of dead-end filtration of biopolymers with pressure electrofiltration. Chemical Engineering Science 58, 3847–3858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Iritani E, Ohashi K, Murase T. (1992) Analysis of Filtration Mechanism of Dead-End Electroultrafiltration for Proteinaceous Solutions. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan 25, 383–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Käppler T, Hofmann R, Posten C. (2006) Elektrofiltration – Einsatzgebiet Enzymproduktion. Chemie Ingenieur Technik 78, 261–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Käppler T, Posten C. (2007) Fractionation of proteins with two-sided electro-ultrafiltration. Journal of Biotechnology 128, 895–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kaufmann M. (1997) Unstable proteins: how to subject them to chromatographic separations for purification procedures. Journal of Chromatography B 699, 347–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lecourtier J, Chauveteau G. (1984) Xanthan Fractionation by Surface Exclusion Chromatography. Macromolecules 17, 1340–1343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mehta A, Zydney AL. (2006) Effect of membrane charge on flow and protein transport during ultrafiltration. Biotechnology Progress 22, 484–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Paradossi G, Brant DA. (1982) Light-Scattering Study of a Series of Xanthan Fractions in Aqueous-Solution. Macromolecules 15, 874–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rumpf H, Gupte AR. (1971) Einflüsse der Porosität und Korngrößenverteilung im Widerstandgesetz der Porenströmung. Chemie Ingenieur Technik 43, 367–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schwuger MJ. (1996) Lehrbuch der Grenzflächenchemie. Thieme, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  21. Steinbüchel A. (2003) Biopolymers. Wiley-VCH Verlag, Weinheim.Google Scholar
  22. Takac S, Elmas S, Calik P, Ozdamar TH. (2000) Separation of the protease enzymes of Bacillus licheniformis from the fermentation medium by crossflow ultrafiltration. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology 75, 491–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Vaneijndhoven RHCM, Saksena S, Zydney AL. (1995) Protein Fractionation Using Electrostatic Interactions in Membrane Filtration. Biotechnology and Bioengineering 48, 406–414.Google Scholar
  24. Wakeman R . (1986) Electrofiltration – Microfiltration Plus Electrophoresis. Chemical Engineering London 426, 65.Google Scholar
  25. Wakeman RJ. (1998) Electrically enhanced microfiltration of albumin suspensions. Food and Bioproducts Processing 76, 53–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Yukawa H, Kobayashi K, Tsukui Y, Yamano S, Iwata M. (1976) Analysis of Batch Electrokinetic Filtration. Journal of chemical Engineering of Japan 9, 396–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Evonik Degussa GmbH, Process TechnologyUSA

Personalised recommendations