Viewing Zones of IP and Other Multi-view Image Methods

  • Jung-Young Son


Multi-view, three-dimensional imaging methods use a different set of view images (multi-view) to create three-dimensional images. In these methods, the images can be projected with an array of projectors (projection type) or displayed on a display panel (contact type). However, the methods are basically based on both binocular and motion parallaxes as their depth cue. For the parallaxes, the viewing zone should be divided into many viewing regions and each of these regions allows viewers to perceive an individual view image or a mixed image composed of parts from more than two different view images in a multi-view image set. The number of viewing regions and the composition of the image at each of the regions can be predicted by the number of different view images in the multi-view image and of pixels in a pixel cell. When the pixel cell is composed of non-integer number pixels, more regions are created than an integer number and the compositions become more complicated. This is because a number of pixel cells are involved in defining the viewing regions.

In this chapter, the viewing zones for the multi-view 3-D imaging systems are analyzed and the image’s composition at each viewing region of the zone is defined. For the contact type, the analysis is extended for both integer and non-integer number pixels in the pixel cell, and it is shown that the depth cues in IP are parallaxes.


Pupil Size View Image Elemental Image Contact Type Motion Parallax 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. [1]
    J.-Y. Son, B. Javidi, and K.-D. Kwack, “Methods for Displaying 3 Dimensional Images” (Invited Paper), Proceedings of the IEEE, Special Issue on: 3-D Technologies for Imaging & Display, Vol. 94, No. 3, pp 502–523, 2006Google Scholar
  2. [2]
    J.-Y. Son and B. Javidi, “3-Dimensional Imaging Systems Based on Multiview Images,” (Invited Paper), IEEE/OSA. J. Display Technol., Vol. 1, No. 1, pp 125–140, 2005Google Scholar
  3. [3]
    Y. Kajiki, H. Yoshikawa, and T. Honda, “Ocular Accommodation by Super Multi-View Stereogram and 45-View Stereoscopic Display,” IDW’96, Proceedings of the 11th International Display Workshops, pp 489–492, 1996Google Scholar
  4. [4]
    J.-Y. Son, V. G. Komar, Y.-S. Chun, S. Sabo, V. Mayorov, L. Balasny, S. Belyaev, M. Semin, M. Krutik, and H.-W. Jeon, “A Multiview 3 Dimensional Imaging System With Full Color Capabilities," SPIE Proc., Vol. 3295A, pp. 218–225, 1998.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    J.-Y. Son, V. V. Saveljev, Y.-J. Choi, J.-E. Bahn, and H.-H. Choi, “Parameters for Designing Autostereoscopic Imaging Systems Based on Lenticular, Parallax Barrier and IP Plates,” Opt. Eng., V 42, No. 11, pp 3326–3333, 2003Google Scholar
  6. [6]
    J.-Y. Son, V. V. Saveljev, M.-C. Park, and S.-W. Kim, “Viewing Zones in PLS Based Multiview 3 Dimensional Imaging Systems,” IEEE/OSA J. Display Technol., Vol. 4, No. 1, pp 109–114, 2008.Google Scholar
  7. [7]
    J.-Y. Son, V. V. Saveljev, J.-S. Kim, S.-S. Kim, and B. Javidi, “Viewing Zones in 3-D Imaging Systems Based on Lenticular, Parallax Barrier and Microlens Array Plates", Appl. Opt., Vol. 43, No. 26, 4985–4992, 2004 (Appl. Opt. Cover)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    R. Boerner, “Three Autostereoscopic 1.25m Diagonal Rear Projection Systems with Tracking Feature,” IDW’97 Proc. pp. 835–838, Japan, 1997Google Scholar
  9. [9]
    G. J. Woodgate, D. Ezra, J. Harrold, N. S. Holliman, G. R. Jones, and R. R. Moseley, “Observer Tracking Autostereoscopic 3D Display Systems,” Proc. of SPIE, Vol. 3012, pp 187–198, 1997ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    J.-Y. Son, “Autostereoscopic Imaging System Based on Special Optical Plates" in Three-Dimensional Television, Video, and Display Technology, B. Javidi and F. Okano (eds.), Springer-Verlag, New-York, 2002Google Scholar
  11. [11]
    M. C. Forman, N. Davies, and M. McCormick, “Continuous Parallax in Discrete Pixelated Integral Three-Dimensional Displays," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp 411–420, 2003ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    M. Martinez-Corral, B. Javidi, R. Martinez-Cuenca, and G. Saavedra, “Multifacet Structure of Observed Reconstructed Integral Imaging,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp 597–603, 2005ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    J. S. Jang and B. Javidi, "Large Depth-of-Focus Time-Multiplexed Three-Dimensional Integral Imaging by Use of Lenslets with Nonuniform Focal Lengths and Aperture Sizes," Opt. Lett., Vol. 28, No. 20, pp 1924–1926, 2003.ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    F. Okano, H. Hosino, J. Arai, M. Yamada, and I. Yuyama, “Three Dimensional Television System Based on Integral Photography,” in Three-Dimensional Television, Video, and Display Technique, B. Javidi and F. Okano (eds.), Springer, Berlin, Germany, 2002Google Scholar
  15. [15]
  16. [16]
    S. S. Kim, V. Saveljev, E. F. Pen, and J. Y. Son, "Optical Design and Analysis for Super-Multiview Three-Dimensional Imaging Systems," SPIE Proc., Vol. 4297, pp 222–226, January 20–26, San Jose, 2001ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    Y. Takaki and H. Nakanuma, “Improvement of Multiple Imaging System Used for Natural 3D Display Which Generates High-Density Directional Images,” Proc. SPIE, Vol. 5243, 2003, pp 43–49ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Advanced Image, School of Information and Communication EngineeringDaegu UniversityKyungsanRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations