A Multi-Criteria Approach for Assessing Options to Remediate Arsenic in Drinking Water
Arsenic exposure threatens millions of people in India, Bangladesh, Thailand, China, and Mexico who drink groundwater contaminated at levels (0.86–1.86 mg/L) far in excess of the 10 μg/L World Health Organization (WHO) maximum permissible level. To address this serious problem, the Division of Chemistry and the Environment of the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemists (IUPAC) established a project designed to provide a simple and practical guide for decision making on arsenic remediation technologies (IUPAC 2003). When selecting technologies appropriate to remediate arsenic, one must consider aspects other than water quality; microbiological contamination, cost, availability of technical expertise to achieve local remediation, and social acceptance factors must also be factored into the remediation equation. Consideration of such multiple criteria involves many stakeholders at a plethora of institutions and organizational levels.
Successful arsenic remediation...
KeywordsUtility Score Performance Matrix Arsenic Species Arsenic Removal Hybrid Technology
- Ahmed MF, Ashraf AM, Adeel Z (2001) Technologies for Arsenic Removal from Drinking Water. International Workshop, Bangladesh University for Engineering & Technology, Dhaka and United Nations University, Tokyo.Google Scholar
- Ahmed MF (2003) Treatment of arsenic contaminated water. In: Ahmed MF (ed) Arsenic Contamination: Bangladesh Perspective. ITN-Bangladesh Centre for Water Supply and Waste Management, BUET, pp 354–403.Google Scholar
- ASCE and UNESCO (1998) Sustainability Criteria for Water Resource Systems. Report of Joint ASCE/UNESCO Task Committee on Sustainability Criteria. Project M-4.3, IHP-IV. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA.Google Scholar
- Ashley RM, Smith H, Jowitt PW, Butler D, Blackwood DJ, Davies JW, Gilmour DJ, Foxon T (2001) A multi-criteria analysis/risk management tool to assess the relative sustainability of water/wastewater systems: SWARD (Sustainable Water Industry Asset Resource Decisions). In: Pratt CJ, Davies JW, Perry JL (eds) Proceedings, 1st National Conference on Sustainable Drainage. Coventry University, Coventry, UK, pp 221–231.Google Scholar
- Boerschke RK, Stewart DK (2001) Evaluation of arsenic mitigation technologies for use in Bangladesh. In: Ahmed MF, Ashraf AM, Adeel Z (eds) Technologies for Arsenic Removal from Drinking Water. International Workshop, Bangladesh University for Engineering & Technology, Dhaka and United Nations University, Tokyo, pp 214–230.Google Scholar
- Ellis JB, Deutsch J-C, Legret M, Martin C, Revitt DM, Scholes L, Seiker H, Zimmerman U (2005) The Day Water decision support approach to the selection of sustainable drainage systems: a multi-criteria methodology for BMP decision makers. Proceedings, 10th International Conference on Urban Drainage, August 2005, Copenhagen. IWA, London.Google Scholar
- Garelick H, Jones H, Dybowska A, Valsami-Jones E (2008) Arsenic pollution sources. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol (this volume)Google Scholar
- IUPAC (2003) Remediation technologies for the removal of arsenic from water and wastewater. www.iupac.org/projects/2003/2003-017-2-600.html.
- IWAHQ (2005) Bonn Charter for Safe Drinking Water. http://www.iwahq.org/uploads/bonn%20charter/IWA_DWS_2005.pdf.
- Koundouri P (2005) The economics of arsenic mitigation. I: Arsenic Contamination of Groundwater in South and East Asian Countries, vol II. Technical Report, Water & Sanitation Program, World Bank, Washington DC, pp 210–262.Google Scholar
- Jakariya M, Chowdhury AMR, Hossain Z, Rahman M, Sarker Q, Khan RI, Rahman M (2003) Sustainable community-based safe water options to mitigate the Bangladesh arsenic catastrophe: a experience from two upazilas. Curr Sci 85(2):141–146.Google Scholar
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2001)Arsenic Remediation Technologies. http://web.mit.edu/murcott/www/arsenic.
- Murcott S (1999) Appropriate remediation technologies for arsenic-contaminated wells in Bangladesh. Arsenic in Bangladesh Ground Water, February 27–28, Wagner College, Staten Island, New York. Available on line: http://phys4harvardedu/∼wilson/arsenic/remediation/arsenic_removal/murcotthtml.
- NAMIC (National Arsenic Mitigation Information Centre) (2006) Bangladesh Arsenic Mitigation Water Supply Project. http://www.bamwsp.org/.
- OCETA (2001) ETV-AM Screening, Testing and Evaluation Protocols, vols 1–6. Ontario Centre for Environmental Technology Advancement, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
- ODPM (2003) Multi-criteria Analysis Manual. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, London. UK. www.dter.gov.uk/about/multicriteria.
- Safiuddin M, Karim MM (2003) Water resources management in the remediation of groundwater arsenic contamination in Bangladesh. In: Murphy T, Guo J (ed) Aquifer Arsenic Toxicity and Treatment. Backhuys, Leiden, The Netherlands, pp 1–17.Google Scholar
- Simos J (1990) Evaluer l'Impact sur l'Environnement: Une Approche Originale par l'Analyse Multicritere et la Negociation. Presses Polytechniques & Universitaire Romandes, Lausanne, Switzerland.Google Scholar
- Smedleigh PL, Kinniburgh DG (2001) Source and behaviour of arsenic in natural waters. In: Synthesis Report: Arsenic in Drinking Water. World Health Organisation, Switzerland, pp 2–61.Google Scholar
- United Nations (2004) World urbanisation prospects: the 2003 revision. Data tables and highlights. United Nations, New York.Google Scholar
- Visoottiviseth P, Ahmed F (2008) Technology for remediation and disposal of arsenic. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol (this volume).[sak1]Google Scholar
- Wenzel V (2001) Integrated assessment and multi-criteria analysis. Phys Chem Earth (B) 26(7/8):541–545.Google Scholar
- WHO (2004) Inactivation (disinfection) processes. In: LeChevallier MW, Au KK (eds) Water Treatment and Pathogen Control: Process Efficiency in Achieving Safe Drinking Water. http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/dwq/en/watreatpath3.pdf.
- WHO (2006) Guidelines for drinking-water quality. www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/dwq.