Molecular Breeding to Improve Forages for Use in Animal and Biofuel Production Systems

  • Joseph H. Bouton


Forage cultivars with positive impacts on animal production are currently being released using traditional plant breeding approaches. Molecular breeding is a relatively new term that describes the use of genomic and transgenic biotechnologies in conjunction with traditional breeding. Traits currently under investigation via these biotechnologies include herbicide tolerance, drought tolerance, resistance to disease and insect pests, tolerance to acid, aluminum toxic and/or saline soils, tolerance to cold or freezing injury, expression of plant genes controlling nodulation and nitrogen fixation, increasing nutritional quality via down regulation of lignin genes, flowering control, and reducing pasture bloat via incorporation of genes to express condensed tannins. Molecular breeding approaches are expensive, and in the case of transgenics, controversial, requiring much planning and even partnerships or consortia with others to defray cost, and overcome a “valley of death” for commercialization due to patent and regulatory issues. Trait incorporation via molecular breeding being conducted by the Consortium for Alfalfa Improvement is discussed as an example of this type of research approach. The future of molecular breeding in forage crops is bright, but is tied to funding, and in the case of transgenics, also lies in the hands of regulatory agencies and their ability to establish a fair process to evaluate real versus perceived risks. Finally, the use of forages as cellulosic biofuel crops offers new molecular breeding opportunities, especially for value added traits such as enhanced biomass and fermentation efficiency. The main criteria for any biofuel crops are high yields achieved with low input costs in an environmentally friendly manner. By this definition, many high yielding, currently grown, perennial forages are good candidates as biofuel crops especially if they can be delivered to a biorefinery as cheaply as possible.


Condensed Tannin Molecular Breeding Forage Crop Cellulosic Ethanol Biofuel Crop 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Arcioni S, Damiani F, Mariani A, Pupilli F (1997) Salinity and aluminum. In: McKersie BD, Brown DCW (eds) Biotechnology and the Improvement of Forage Legumes. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp 61–89Google Scholar
  2. Brummer EC, Bouton JH, Sledge M (2007) Biotechnology and molecular approaches to forage improvement. In: Barnes RF, Nelson CJ, Moore KJ, Collins M (eds) Forages – The Science of Grassland Agriculture, 6, Volume II, Blackwell Publishing, Ames, IA, USA, pp 439–451Google Scholar
  3. Burton, GW, Hanna WW (1995) Bermudagrass. In: Barnes RF, Miller DA, Nelson CJ (eds) Forages – An Introduction to Grassland Agriculture, 5, Volume 1, Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, USA, pp 421–429Google Scholar
  4. Ellison NA, Liston A, Steiner JJ, Williams WM, Taylor NL (2006) Molecular phylogenetics of the clover genus (Trifolium. -Leguminosae) Mol Phylogenet Evol 39:688–705CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Evans DA (1989) Somaclonal variation – genetic basis and breeding applications. Trends in Genet 5:46–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hopkins A, Wang Z, Mian R, Sledge M, Barker R (2003) Molecular breeding of forage and turf. Kluwer, Dordrecht, the NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  7. Humphreys MO (2005). Molecular breeding for genetic improvement of forage crops and turf. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, the NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  8. McLaughlin SB, Kszos LA (2005) Development of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum. ) as a bioenergy feedstock in the United States Biomass Bioenergy 28:515–535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Spangenberg G (2001) Molecular breeding of forage crops. Kluwer, Dordrecht, the NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  10. Stebbins GL (1950) Variation and evolution in plants. Columbia University Press. New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Tietz N (2007) No guarantees. Hay & Forage Grower 22(6):4–12 (Also available online at

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Samuel Roberts Noble FoundationUSA

Personalised recommendations