Advertisement

Racial Characteristics and Female Facial Attractiveness Perception Among United States University Students

  • Nicole E. Belletti
  • T. Joel Wade

Abstract

Research in the area of facial attractiveness has examined the role of race in the perception of beauty, revealing that regardless of our own skin color, we tend to prefer light skin to dark skin in most matters of choice. Subsequently, the current research, utilizing morphed faces combined in varying degrees Black, White, and Asian facial characteristics, was expected to corroborate with past research by showing that participants found the “pure” White face the most attractive and the “pure” Black face the least attractive. Instead, participants found least attractive the “pure” Asian face. The results are discussed in terms of prior research with a focus on the concept of familiarity. Also discussed are possible limitations and opportunities for future research to further examine and clarify the difference between the present data and the existing literature.

Keywords

Facial Feature Skin Tone Facial Attractiveness Attractiveness Rating Sexual Selection Hypothesis 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Alley, T. R. (1988). Physiognomy and social perception. In T. R. Alley (Ed.) Social and applied aspects of perceiving faces (pp. 167–190). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  2. Alley, T. R., & Hilebrandt, K.A. (1988). Determinants and consequences of facial aesthetics. In T. R. Alley (Ed.) Social and applied aspects of perceiving faces (pp. 101–140). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  3. Badcock, C. F. (1920). The significance of facial beauty. Scientific Progress, 15: 70–73.Google Scholar
  4. Bauduoin, J. Y., & Tiberghien, G. (2004). Symmetry, averageness, and feature size in the facial attractiveness of women. Acta Psychologica, 117(3): 313–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berry, D. S. (1991). Attractive faces are not all created equal: Joint effects of facial babyishness and attractiveness on social perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(5): 523–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bradshaw, C. K. (1992). Beauty and the beast: On racial ambiguity. In M. P. P. Root (Ed.), Racially mixed people in America (pp. 77–90). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  7. Chen, N. Y., Shaffer, D. R., & Wu, C., (1997). On physical attractiveness stereotyping in Taiwan: A revised sociocultural perspective. Journal of Social Psychology, 137(1): 117–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cunningham, M. R. (1986). Measuring the physical in physical attractiveness: Quasi- experiments on the sociobiology of female facial beauty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(5): 925–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cunningham, M. R., Roberts, A. R., Barbee, A. P., Druen, P. B. et al. (1995). ‘Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours’: Consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(2): 261–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cunningham, M. R., Barbee, A.P., & Philhower, C. L. (2002). Dimensions of facial physical attractiveness: The intersection of biology and culture. In G. Rhodes & L. A. Zebrowitz, (Eds.). Facial attractiveness: Evolutionary, cognitive, and social perspectives (pp. 193–238). Westport, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
  11. de Casanova, E. M. (2004). ‘No ugly woman’: concepts of race and beauty among adolescent women in Ecuador. Gender and Society, 18(3): 287–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Deutsch, C. K. (1987). Disproportion in psychiatric syndromes. In L. G. Farkas & I. R. Munro (Eds.), Anthropometric facial proportions in medicine (pp. 131–141). Springfield, IL: Thomas.Google Scholar
  13. Dion, K. K. (2002). Cultural perspectives on facial attractiveness. In G. Rhodes, and L. A. Zebrowitz (Eds.), Facial attractiveness: Evolutionary, cognitive, and social perspectives (pp. 239–260). Westport, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
  14. Dion, K. K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 285–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Eating disorders coalition [for research, policy, & action]. (2006). http://www.eatingdisorderscoalition.org/reports/statistics.html. Accessed 16 April 2006.
  16. Eyetsemitan, F. (2004). An exploratory study of the emotion-expressive behaviors of “peace,” “contentment,” and “annoyed/irritated”: Implications for dead and living faces. Omega: Journal of Death and Dying, 48(1): 88–99.Google Scholar
  17. Fink, B., Grammer, K., & Thornhill, R. (2001). Human (homo sapiens) facial attractiveness in relation to skin texture and color. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 115(1): 92–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Galton, F. (1878). Composite portraits. Nature, 18: 97–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gangestad, S. W., Thornhill, R., & Yeo, R. A. (1994). Facial attractiveness, developmental stability, and fluctuating asymmetry. Ethology and Sociobiology, 15(2): 73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gordon, K. H., Perez, M., & Joiner Jr., T. E. (2002). The impact of racial stereotypes on eating disorder recognition. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 32(2):219–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hall, R. E. (1998). Skin color bias: A new perspective on an old problem. Journal of Psychology, 132(2): 238–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Helms, J. E. (1995). The people of color (POC) racial identity attitude scale. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  23. Hill, M. E. (2002). Skin color and the perception of attractiveness among African Americans: Does gender make a difference? Social Psychology Quarterly, 65(1): 77–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hinsz, V. B., Matz, D. C., & Patience, R. A. (2001). Does women’s hair signal reproductive potential? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31(2): 166–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ishi, H., Gyoba, J., Kamahi, M., Mukaida, S., & Akamatsu, S. (2004). Analysis of facial attractiveness on feminised and juvenilised faces. Perception, 33(2): 135–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Johnston, V. S. (2000). Female facial beauty: The fertility hypothesis. Pragmatics and Cognition 8,(1): 107–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jones, B. C., Anthony, A. C., Burt, D. M., & Perrett, D. I. (2004a). When facial attractiveness is only skin deep. Perception, 33(5): 569–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jones, B. C., Little, A C., Feinberg, D. R., Penton-Voak, I. S., Tiddeman, B. P., & Perrett, D. I. (2004b). The relationship between shape symmetry and perceived skin condition in male facial attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25(1): 24–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jones, D., & Hill, K. (1993). Criteria of facial attractiveness in five populations. Human Nature, 4(3), 271–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Langlois, J. H., & Roggman, L. A. (1990). Attractive faces are only average. Psychological Science, 1(2): 115–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Langlois, J., Roggman, L. A., & Ritter, J. M. (1987). Infant preferences for attractive faces: rudiments or a stereotype? Developmental Psychology, 86: 415–427.Google Scholar
  32. Langlois, J. H., Roggman, L. A., & Musselman, L. (1995). What is average and what is not average about attractive faces? Psychological Science, 5(4): 214–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Livshits, G., & Kobylianski, E. (1991). Fluctuating asymmetry as a possible measure of developmental homeostasis in humans: A review. Human Biology, 63:441–266.Google Scholar
  34. Lundqvist, D., Esteves, R., & Ohman, A. (2004). The face of wrath: The role of features and configurations in conveying social threat. Cognition and Emotion, 18(2): 161–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mack, D., & Rainey, D. (1990). Female applicant’s personal grooming and personnel selection. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 5(5): 399–407.Google Scholar
  36. [The] McKnight Investigators. (2003). Risk factors for the onset of eating disorders in adolescent girls: Results of the McKnight longitudinal risk factor. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160: 248–254.Google Scholar
  37. Mealey, L., Bridgstock, R., & Townsend, G. C. (1999). Symmetry and perceived facial attractiveness: A monozygotic co-twin comparison. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(1): 151–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mescko, N., & Bereczkei, T. (2004). Hairstyle as an adaptive means of displayed phenotypic quality. Human nature: An interdisciplinary bisocial perspective, 15(3): 251–270.Google Scholar
  39. Morris, D. (1967). The naked ape: A zoologist’s study of the human animal. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  40. NAACP. (2008). http://www.naacp.org/home/index.htm. Accessed 27 January 2008.
  41. Oetting, E. R., & Beauvais, F. (1991). Orthogonal cultural orientation theory: The cultural identification of minority adolescents. International Journal of the Addictions, 25: 655–685.Google Scholar
  42. Parham, T. A., & Helms, J. E. (1985). Attitudes of racial identity and self-esteem of Black students: An exploratory investigation. Journal of College Student Personnel, 26(2): 143–147.Google Scholar
  43. Parker, S., Nichter, M., Vuckovic, N., Sims, C., & Ritenbaugh, C. (1995). Body image and weight concerns among African American and White adolescent females: Differences that make a difference. Human Organization, 54(2): 103–114.Google Scholar
  44. Perrett, D. I., Burt, D. M., Penton-Voak, I. S., Lee, K. J., Rowland, D. A., & Edwards, R. (1999). Symmetry and human facial attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 20(5): 295–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Peskin, M., & Newell, F. N. (2004). Familiarity breeds attraction: Effects of exposure on the attractiveness of typical and distinctive faces. Perception, 33(2): 147–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Phinney, J. S. (1992). The multigroup ethnic identity measure: A new scale for use with diverse groups. Journal of Adolescent Research, 7: 156–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Poran, M. A. (1991). Denying diversity: Perceptions of beauty and social comparison processes among Latina, Black, and White women. Sex Roles, 47(1): 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rhodes, G. & Tremewan, T. (1996). Averageness, exaggeration, and facial attractiveness. Psychological Science, 7(2): 105–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rhodes, G., Proffitt, F., Grady, J. M., & Sumich, A. (1998). Facial symmetry and the perception of beauty. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5(4): 659–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rhodes, G., Harwood, K., Yoshikawa, S., Nishitani, M., & McLean, I. (2002).The attractiveness of average faces: Cross-cultural evidence and possible biological basis. In G. Rhodes & L. A. Zebrowitz (Eds.), Facial attractiveness: Evolutionary, cognitive, and social perspectives (pp. 35–58). Westport, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
  51. Rubenstein, A. J., Langlois, J. H., & Roggman, L. A. (2002). What makes a face attractive and why: The role of averageness in defining facial beauty. In G. Rhodes & L. A. Zebrowitz (Eds.), Facial attractiveness: Evolutionary, cognitive, and social perspectives (pp. 1–34). Westport, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
  52. Stewart, J. E. (1980). Defendant's attractiveness as a factor in the outcome of criminal trials: An observational study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10(4), 348–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Terry, R. L. (1977). Further evidence on components of facial attractiveness. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 45(1): 130.Google Scholar
  54. Terry, R. L., & Davis, J. S. (1976). Components of facial attractiveness. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 42(3): 918.Google Scholar
  55. Tipples, J., Atkinson, A. P., & Andrew, W. (2002). The eyebrow frown: A salient social signal. Emotion, 2(3): 288–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wade, T. J., & Dautrich, L. (2005). Racial characteristics and individual differences in men’s evaluations of women's facial attractiveness and personality. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  57. Wade, T. J., & DiMaria, C. (2003). Weight halo effects: Individual differences in perceived life success as a function of women’s race and weight. Sex Roles, 48(9–10): 461–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wade, T. J., Dyckman, K. A., & Cooper, M. (2004). Invisible men: Evolutionary theory and attractiveness and personality evaluations of 10 African American male facial shapes. Journal of Black Psychology, 30(4): 477–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wade, T. J., Irvine, K., & Cooper, M. (2004). Racial characteristics and individual differences in women’s evaluations of men’s facial attractiveness and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(5): 1083–1092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zaidel, D. W., Aarde, S. M., & Baig, K. (2005). Appearance of symmetry, beauty, and health in human faces. Brain and Cognition, 57(3): 561–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Zebrowitz, L.A., Montepare, J. M., & Lee, H. (1993). They don't all look alike: Individual impressions of other racial groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(1): 85–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zebrowitz, L. A., Hall, J. A., Murphy, N. A., & Rhodes, G. (2002). Looking smart and looking good: Facial cues to intelligence and their origins. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(2): 238–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyBucknell UniversityWalnut portUSA

Personalised recommendations