Skip to main content

Semidefinite Optimization

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Optimization—Theory and Practice

Abstarct

Semidefinite optimization (SDO) differs from linear optimization (LO) in that it deals with optimization problems over the cone of symmetric positive semidefinite matrices Sn+ instead of nonnegative vectors. In many cases the objective function is linear and SDO can be interpreted as an extension of LO. It is a branch of convex optimization and contains — besides LO — linearly constrained QP, quadratically constrained QP and — for example — second-order cone programming as special cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. A. Ben-Tal, A. Nemirovski (2001): Lectures on Modern Convex Optimization: Analysis, Algorithms, and Engineering Applications. SIAM, Philadelphia

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. M. J. Todd (2001): Semidefinite Optimization. Acta Numerica 10, pp. 515–560

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. C. Helmberg (2002): Semidefinite Programming. European J. Operational Research 137, pp. 461–482

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. S. Lobo et al. (1998): Applications of Second Order Cone Programming. Linear Algebra and its Applications 284, pp. 193–228

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. H. Yamashita, H. Yabe, K. Harada (2007): A Primal-Dual Interior Point Method for Nonlinear Semidefinite Programming. Technical Report, Department of Math. Information Science, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  6. K.Ċ. Toh (1999): Primal-Dual Path-Following Algorithms for Determinant Maximization Problems with Linear Matrix Inequalities. Computational Optimization and Applications 14, pp. 309–330

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. L. Vandenberghe, S. Boyd, S. P. Wu (1998): Determinant Maximization with Linear Matrix Inequality Constraints. SIAM J. on Matrix Analysis and Applications 19, pp. 499–533

    Google Scholar 

  8. C. Roos, J. van der Woude (2006): Convex Optimization and System Theory. http://www.isa.ewi.tudelft.nl/~roos/courses/WI4218/

  9. M. Halická, E. de Klerk, C. Roos (2002): On the Convergence of the Central Path in Semidefinite Optimization. SIAM J. Optimization 12, pp. 1090–1099

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. J. Todd (1999): A Study of Search Directions in Primal-Dual Interior-Point Methods for Semidefinite Programming. Optimization Methods and Software 11, pp. 1–46

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. C. Helmberg et al. (1996): An Interior-Point Method for Semidefinite Programming. SIAM J. Optimization 6, pp. 342–361

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Kojima, S. Shindoh, S. Hara (1997): A note on the Nesterov-Todd and the Kojima-Shindoh-Hara Search Directions in Semidefinite Programming. SIAM J. Optimization 7, pp. 86–125

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. D. C. Monteiro (1997): Primal-Dual Path-Following Algorithms for Semidefinite Programming. SIAM J. Optimization 7, pp. 663–678

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. Wolkowicz, R. Saigal, L. Vandenberghe (eds.) (2000): Handbook of Semidefinite Programming: Theory, Algorithms and Applications. Kluwer, Boston, Dordrecht, London

    Google Scholar 

  15. E. de Klerk (2002): Aspects of Semidefinite Programming: Interior Point Algorithms and Selected Applications. Kluwer, Boston, Dordrecht, London

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. F. Glineur (1998): Pattern Separation via Ellipsoids and Conic Programming. Mémoire de D.E.A. (Master’s Thesis), Faculté Polytechnique de Mons, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. Boyd, L. Vandenberghe (2004): Convex Optimization. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. P. R. Halmos (1993): Finite-Dimensional Vector Spaces. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. A. Antoniou, W. Lu (2007): Practical Optimization: Algorithms and Engineering Applications. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wilhelm Forst .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Forst, W., Hoffmann, D. (2010). Semidefinite Optimization. In: Optimization—Theory and Practice. Springer Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics and Technology . Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-78977-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics