Advertisement

Wind Disturbance Models

  • Wodek Gawronski
Part of the Mechanical Engineering Series book series (MES)

Wind is the main source of antenna/telescope disturbance. It loads the antenna structure and causes pointing problems. The wind load is divided into mean (or static load) and variable load (gusts). The load depends on the wind speed, on direction of the wind with respect to the antenna structure (yaw), and on the antenna elevation position (pitch).

This chapter discusses models of steady-state wind, and a model of wind gusts. The steady-state model is obtained from wind tunnel data for different yaw angles and different antenna elevation positions. The model is verified with the 34-m antenna wind data obtained in the field.

The wind gust models include forces acting on the dish, wind torques at the drives, and wind disturbance at the velocity input of the velocity loop.

Steady-State Wind Disturbance Model

The antenna wind loads are typically separated into two components: steady-state (or mean, or static) and dynamic (gusts) load. Both the static and dynamic wind loads are used to...

Keywords

Wind Speed Wind Tunnel Elevation Angle Unit Standard Deviation Friction Torque 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Blaylock RB. (1964). Aerodynamic Coefficients for Model of a Paraboloidal Reflector Directional Antenna Proposed for a JPL Advanced Antenna System. JPL Memorandum CP-6 (internal document), Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fox NL. (1962). Load Distributions on the Surface of Paraboloidal Reflector Antennas. JPL Memorandum CP-4 (internal document), Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fox NL, Layman, Jr. B. (1962). Preliminary Report on Paraboloidal Reflector Antenna Wind Tunnel Tests. JPL Memorandum CP-3 (internal document), Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gawronski W. (1995). Wind Gust Models Derived from Field Data. TDA Progress Report 42-123, pp. 30–36. Available at http://ipnpr.jpl.nasa.gov/progress_report/42-123/123 G.pdf.
  5. 5.
    Gawronski W. (2004). Modeling Wind Gusts Disturbances for the Analysis of Antenna Pointing Accuracy. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, 46(1): 50–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gawronski W, Bienkiewicz B, Hill RE. (1994). Wind-Induced Dynamics of a Deep Space Network Antenna. Journal of Sound and Vibration, 178(1).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gawronski W, Mellstrom JA. (1994). Control and Dynamics of the Deep Space Network Antennas. In: Control and Dynamics Systems, ed. C.T. Leondes, vol. 63, Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 289–412.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gawronski W, Mellstrom JA. (1994). Field Verification of the Wind Tunnel Coefficients. TDA Progress Report 42-119, pp. 210--220. Available at http://ipnpr.jpl.nasa.gov/progress_report/42-119/119G.pdf.
  9. 9.
    Gawronski W, Mellstrom JA, Bienkiewicz B. (2005). Antenna Mean Wind Torques: A Comparison of Field and Wind Tunnel Data. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, 47(5).Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rae, Jr., WH, Pope A. (1984). Low-Speed Wind Tunnel Testing. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Simiu E, Scanlan RH. (1996). Wind Effects on Structures. John Wiley, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wodek Gawronski
    • 1
  1. 1.California Institute of TechnologyJet Propulsion LaboratoryPasedenaUSA

Personalised recommendations