Sex Differences in Nicotine Reinforcement and Reward: Influences on the Persistence of Tobacco Smoking
The factors that acutely reinforce tobacco smoking behavior can be divided into nicotine and non-nicotine contributions. Substantial laboratory-based research suggests that the smoking behavior of women, relative to that of men, is less sensitive to manipulations of nicotine and more sensitive to manipulations of non-nicotine factors, such as smoking-associated environmental stimuli (e.g., cues). This chapter examines controlled human research on sex differences in acute nicotine reinforcement (i.e., self-administration behavior) and reward (self-reported ratings of the hedonic characteristics of a substance). Compared to men, women self-administer nicotine to a lesser degree, and nicotine pre-treatment alters their subsequent smoking or nicotine self-administration to a lesser extent. On the other hand, smoking reinforcement and reward in women are influenced more by non-nicotine factors, such as the presence of smoking cues, accurate verbal information about the nicotine content of cigarettes, and controllability over smoking pattern. These differences in responsiveness to nicotine versus non-nicotine factors may help explain why women have greater difficulty quitting in general, and with nicotine patch in particular, compared to men. Clinical research may be able to take advantage of these differences to develop improved interventions for smoking cessation in women, a change with important public health implications.
KeywordsNicotine Replacement Therapy Nasal Spray Nicotine Patch Nicotine Dose Nicotine Nasal Spray
The preparation of this chapter was supported by Grants DA12655, DA16483, and DA19478, and by University of Pennsylvania Transdisciplinary Tobacco Research Center (TTURC) Grant P50 DA/CA84718.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2005). Cigarette smoking among adults—United States, 2004. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 54, 1121–1123.Google Scholar
- Cinciripini, P. M., Lapitsky, L., Seay, S., Wallfisch, A., Kitchens, K., & Van Vunakis, H. (1995). The effects of smoking schedules on cessation outcome: Can we improve on common methods of gradual and abrupt nicotine withdrawal? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 388–399.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Grobe, J. E. (1999). The importance of controllability over drug intake in moderating the effects of tobacco smoking. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
- International Early Lung Cancer Action Program Investigators (2006). Women’s susceptibility to tobacco carcinogens and survival after diagnosis of lung cancer. Journal of the American Medical Association, 296, 180–184.Google Scholar
- Lerman, C., Perkins, K. A., & Gould, T. (in press). Nicotine dependence endophenotypes in chronic smokers. NCI Smoking and Tobacco Control Monograph 22: Phenotypes, Endophenotypes, and Genetic Studies of Nicotine Dependence (Chapter 8). Washington DC: US Public Health Service.Google Scholar
- Perkins, K. A., Ciccocioppo, M., Conklin, C., Milanak, M., Grottenthaler, A. & Sayette, M. (2008). Mood influences on acute smoking responses are independent of nicotine intake and dose expectancy. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117, 79–93.Google Scholar
- Perkins, K. A., Conklin, C. A., & Levine, M. D. (2008). Cognitive-behavioral treatment of smoking cessation. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Perkins, K. A., & Scott, J. (in press). Sex differences in long-term smoking cessation rates due to nicotine patch. Nicotine & Tobacco Research.Google Scholar
- USDHHS (1988). The Health Consequences of Smoking: Nicotine Addiction. A Report of the U.S. Surgeon General. Washington DC: U.S. Public Health Service.Google Scholar