Advertisement

Primate Conservation in South America: The~Human and Ecological Dimensions of the Problem

  • Alejandro Estrada
Part of the Developments in Primatology: Progress and Prospects book series (DIPR)

Keywords

Gross Domestic Product Forest Cover United Nations Environment Programme United Nation Development Programme Forest Loss 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altieri, M. A. 2004. Globally Important Ingenious Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS): extent, significance, and implications for development. http://www.fao.org/ag/agl/agll/ giahs/documents/backgroundpapers_altieri.doc
  2. Biofuelwatch. 2007. Agrofuels – Toward a Reality check in nine key areas. Report submitted to the Twelfth Meeting of the Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice (SBSTTA-12), 2–6 July 2007, Paris, France of the Convention on Biological Diversity . Published by: Biofuelwatch (http://www.biofuelwatch.org.uk/background.php)
  3. Boswell, A. 2007. Biofuels for transport – a dangerous distraction. Scientists for Global Responsibility Newsletter (January No. 33). www.sgr.org.ukGoogle Scholar
  4. Bollen, A., Van Elsacker, L. and Ganzhorn J. U. 2004. Tree dispersal strategies in the littoral forest of Sainte Luce (SE-Madagascar) Oecologia 139:604–616PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brook, B. W., Bradshaw, C. J. A., Koh, L. P. and Sodhi, N. S. 2006. Momentum drives de crash: mass extinction in the tropics. Biotropica 38:302–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burnett, D. A. and Flannery, T. F. 2005. Fifty millennia of catastrophic extinctions after human contact. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20:395–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Casson A. 2003. Oil palm, Soybeans and Critical Habitat Loss: A Review. WWF Forest Conversion Initiative. Office Hohlstrasse 110 CH-8010 SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  8. Chape, S., Fish, L., Fox, P. and Spalding, M. 2003. United Nations List of Protected Areas (IUCN/UNEP, Gland, Switzerland/Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
  9. Chape S., Harrison, J., Spalding, M. and Lysenko I. 2005. Measuring the extent and effectiveness of protected areas as an indicator for meeting global biodiversity targets. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 360:443–455.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chapman, C. A. and Onderdonk D. A. 1998. Forests without primates: primate/plant codependency. Am. J. Primatol. 45:127–141.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. CBD/UNDP. 2006. Convention on Biological Diversity-CBD/UNDP. United Nations.Google Scholar
  12. Cormier, L. 2006. A Preliminary Review of Neotropical Primates in the Subsistence and Symbolism of Indigenous Lowland South American Peoples. Ecol. Envir. Anthrop. 2:14–32.Google Scholar
  13. Daily, G. D., Ceballos G., Pacheco J., Suzan G. and Sanchez-Azofeifa, A. 2003. Country side biogeography of neotropical mammals: conservation opportunities in agricultural landscapes in Costa Rica. Cons. Biol. 17:1815–1826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Defries, R., Hansen, A., Newton A.C. and Hansen M. C. 2005. Increasing isolation of protected areas in tropical forests over the past twenty years. Ecol. Appl. 15:19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dinerstein, E. and Wikramanayake, E. D. 1993. Beyond hotspots: how to prioritize investments to conserve biodiversity in the Indo-Pacific region. Cons. Biol. 7:53–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Donald, P. F. 2004. Biodiversity impacts of some agricultural commodity production systems. Cons. Biol. 18:17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Encyclopedia Britannica. 2006. www.britannica.comGoogle Scholar
  18. Estrada, A, Sáenz, J., Harvey, C.A., Naranjo E., Muñoz D. and Rosales-Meda M. 2006. Primates in agroecosystems: conservation value of agricultural practices in Mesoamerican landscapes. In A. Estrada, P. A. Garber, M. S. M. Pavelka and L. G. Luecke (eds.), New Perspectives in the Study of Mesoamerican Primates: Distribution, Ecology, Behavior and Conservation {pp. 437–470}. New York: Springer Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. FAO. 2001. Food Security Document. URL, http://www.faor.org/biodiversity
  20. FAO. 2007. State of the World’s Forests 2007. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
  21. FAOSTATS. 2006. http://faostat.fao.org/
  22. Gardner, T. A., Barlow, J., Parry, L. W. and Peres, C. A. 2006. Predicting the uncertain future of tropical forest species in a data vacuum. Biotropica 39:25–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gaston, K. J. 2000. Global patterns in biodiversity. Nature 405:220–227.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Henle, K., Lindemayer, D. B., Margules, C. R., Saunders, D. A. and Wissel. C. 2004a. Species survival in fragmented landscapes: where are we now? Biodiv. Cons. 13:1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Henle, K., Davoes, K. F., Kleyer, M., Margules C. and Settele J. 2004b. Predictors of species sensitivity to fragmentation. Biodiv. Cons. 13:207–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hirsch, A., Dias, L. G., Martins, L. de O., Campos, R. F., Resende, N. A. T. and Landau, E. C. 2002. Database of Georreferenced Occurrence Localities of Neotropical Primates. Department of Zoology / UFMG, Belo Horizonte. http://www.icb.ufmg.br/zoo/primatas/home_bdgeoprim.htm and CD-Rom.
  27. Horner-Devine, C., Daily, G. C., Ehrlich, P. R. and C. L. Boggs. 2003. Countryside biogeography of tropical butterflies. Cons. Biol. 17:168–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hughes, J. B., Daily, G. C. and Ehrlich, P. R. 2002. Agricultural policy can help preserve tropical forest birds in countryside habitats. Ecol. Lett. 5:21–129.Google Scholar
  29. IUCN/SSC/PSG Primate Specialist Group. 2006. http://www.primate-sg.org/diversity.htm
  30. IUCN/WCPA/UNEP. 2006. World Database on Protected Areas. WDPA (IUCN–WCPA and UNEP) http://www.unep-wcmc.org/wdpa/index.htm
  31. Lambert, J. E. and Garber P. A. 1998. Evolutionary and ecological implications of primate seed dispersal. Am. J. Primatol. 45:9–28.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. LANIC. 2006. Latinamerican Network Information Center-University of Texas. http://www1.lanic.utexas.edu/la/region/indigenous/
  33. Laurance, W. F., Lovejoy, T. E., Vasconcelos, H. L. Bruna, E. M., Dirham, R. K. and Stoufer P. C. 2002. Ecosystem decay of Amazonian forest fragments: a 22 year investigation. Cons. Biol. 16:605–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Laurance, W. F. 2007. Have we overstated the tropical biodiversity crisis ? Trends Ecol. Evol. Online http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2006.09.014
  35. Laurance, W. F. and Peres, C. A. Eds. 2006. Emerging Threats to Tropical Forests. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  36. Marsh, L. (ed.). 2003. Primates in Fragments. New York: Kluwer-Plenum.Google Scholar
  37. MA. 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being. Current State and Trends. The Millenium Ecosystem Assessment. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  38. Muñoz, D., Estrada, A., Naranjo, E. and Ochoa, S. 2006. Foraging ecology of howler monkeys (Alouatta palliata) in a cacao (Theobroma cacao) plantation, Tabasco, Mexico. Am. J. Primatol. 68:127–142.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Murphy, H. T. and Lovett-Doust, J. 2004. Context and connectivity in plant populations and landscape mosaics: does the matrix matter? Oikos 105:3–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Naughton-Treves, L. and Nick, S. 2004. Wildlife conservation in agroforestry buffer zones: opportunities and conflict. In G. Schroth, G. Fonseca, C. Gascon, H. Vasconcelos, A. M. Izac and C. A. Harvey (eds.), Agroforestry and Conservation of Biodiversity in Tropical Landscapes (pp. 319–345). New York: Island Press Inc.Google Scholar
  41. Nepstad, D., Verissimo A, Alencar A, Nobre C, Lima E., Lefebvre P., Schlesinger P., Potter C., Mountinho P., Mendoza E., Cochrane M., and Brooks V. 1999. Large-scale impoverishment of amazonian forests by logging and fire. Nature 398:505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Oil World. 2002. The Revised Oil World 2002: Supply, Demand and Prices. Hamburg: ISTA Mielke GmbH.Google Scholar
  43. Peres, C. 2000. Evaluating the impact of sustainability of subsistence hunting at multiple forest sites. In J. G. Robinson and E. L. Bennett (eds.), Hunting for Sustainability in Tropical Forests (pp. 31–57). New york: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Raboy B. E., Christman, M. C. and Dietz J. M. 2004. The use of degraded and shade cocoa forests by Endangered golden-headed lion tamarins, Leontopithecus chrysomelas. Oryx 38:75–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. RBGE 2003. The Biodiversity of the Brazilian Cerrado, Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, http://www.rbge.org.uk/rbge/web/science/research/biodiversity/cerrado.jsp.
  46. Ricketts, T. H. 2001. The matrix matters: effective isolation in fragmented landscapes. Am. Nat. 158:87–99.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Righelato, R. 2005. Just how green are biofuels. World Land Trust. http://www.worldlandtrust.org/
  48. Rodrigues, A. S. L., Andelman, S. J., Bakarr, M. I., Boitani, L., Brooks, T. M., Cowling, R. M., Fishpool, L. D. C., da Fonseca, G. A. B., Gaston, K. J., Hoffmann, M., Long, J. S., Marquet, P. A., Pilgrim, J. D., Pressey, R. L.,, Schipper, J., Sechrest, W., Stuart, S. N., Underhill, L. G., Waller, R. W., Watts, M. E. J., and Yan, X. 2004. Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity. Nature 428:640–643.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. RRU. 2002. Evaluation of the Comparative Energy, Global Warming and Socio-Economic Costs and Benefits for Biodiesel, Resources Research Unit, School of Environment and Development, Sheffield Hallam University. Source: http://www.defra.gov.uk/farm/acu/ research/reports/nf0422.pdf
  50. Schroth, G., da Fonseca, G. A. B., Gascon, C., Vasconcelos, H., Izac, A. M. and Harvey, C. A. Eds. 2004. Agroforestry and Conservation of Biodiversity in Tropical Landscapes. New York: Island Press Inc.Google Scholar
  51. Schnepf, R., Dohlman, E. and Bolling, C. 2001. Agriculture in Brazil and Argentina: Developments and Prospects for Major Field Crops. Market and Trade Economics Division, Economic Research Service, US Department of Agriculture, Agriculture and Trade Report, WRS-01-3.Google Scholar
  52. Sodhi, L. P. Koh, B., Brook, W. and Ng, P. K. L. 2004. Southeast Asian biodiversity: an impending disaster. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19:654–659.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Strier, K. B., Boubli, J. P., Pontual, F. B. and Mendes, S. L. 2006. Human dimensions of northern muriqui conservation efforts. Ecol. Envir. Anthrop. 2:44–53.Google Scholar
  54. Tengnäs, B. and Nilsson, B. 2003. Soybean: Where Is It From and What Are Its Uses? A report for WWF Sweden. Stockholm: WWF Sweden.Google Scholar
  55. The Columbia Gazetteer of the World Online. 2005. South America. Columbia University Press New York. http://www.columbiagazetteer.org/
  56. Tilman, D., May, R. M., Lehman, C. L.and Nowak M. A. 1994. Habitat destruction and the extinction debt. Nature 371:65–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Thorp, R., Caumartin C. and Gray-Molina, G. 2006. Inequality, Ethnicity, Political Mobilization and Political Violence in Latin America: The Cases of Bolivia, Guatemala and Peru. Bull. Lat. Am. Res. 25:453–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. UNDP. 2006a. Beyond Scarcity: Power, Poverty and the Global Water Crisis. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  59. UNDP. 2006b. United Nations Environmental Program http://www.unep.org
  60. UNFPA 2007. State of World Population 2007. Unleashing the Potential of Urban Growth. Rome:United Nations Population Fund.Google Scholar
  61. USDA. 2003a. Agricultural Baseline Projections to 2012. Washington DC: United States Department of Agriculture,Google Scholar
  62. USDA. 2003b. Brazil: Future Agricultural Expansion Potential Underrated, Production Estimates and Crop Assessment. Washington, DC: Division Foreign Agricultural Service. United States Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
  63. van Roosmalen, M. G. M., van Roosmalen, T. and Mittermeier, R. A. 2002. A taxonomic review of the titi monkeys, genus Callicebus Thomas, 1903, with the description of two new species, Callicebus bernhardi and Callicebus stephennashi, from Brazilian Amazonia. Neotrop. Primates 10 (Suppl): 1–52.Google Scholar
  64. Whitmore, T.C. 1998. Tropical Rain Forests. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Wright, S. J. and Muller-Landau, H. C. 2006. The future of tropical forest species. Biotropica 38:267–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. WRI/UNDP/UNEP/WB. 2005. The Wealth of the Poor – Managing Ecosystems to Fight Poverty. 2005. World Resources Institute (WRI) in collaboration with United Nations Development Programme, Washington, D. C.: United Nations Environment Programme and World Bank.Google Scholar
  67. WWF. 2006. Living Planet Report 2006. World Wildlife Fund, Zoological Society of London and Global Footprint Network. http://www.panda.org/news_facts/publications/ living_planet_report/index.cfm
  68. Zar, J. H. 1998. Biostatistical Analysis. 4th edition. Prentice Hall Inc, NJ.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alejandro Estrada
    • 1
  1. 1.Estación de Biología Tropical Los TuxtlasInstituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoMéxico

Personalised recommendations