Primate Cognition: Integrating Social and Ecological Information in Decision-Making

  • Paul A. Garber
  • Júlio César Bicca-Marques
  • Maria Aparecida de O. Azevedo-Lopes
Part of the Developments in Primatology: Progress and Prospects book series (DIPR)


Social Information Food Reward Spider Monkey Food Patch Ecological Information 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Addessi, E., and Visalberghi, E. 2006. Rationality in capuchin monkey’s feeding behavior? In S. Hurley and M. Nudds (eds.), Rational Animals? (pp. 313–329). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ayres, M., Ayres Jr., M., Ayres, D. L., and Santos, A. S. 2005. BioEstat 4.0. Belém: Sociedade Civil Mamirauá.Google Scholar
  3. Barnard, C. J., and Sibly, R. M. 1981. Producers and scroungers: A general model and its application to captive flocks of house sparrows. Anim. Behav. 29:543–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barrett, L., and Henzi, S. P. 2006. Monkeys, markets, and minds: Biological markets and primate sociality. In P. M. Kappeler and C. P. van Schaik (eds.), Cooperation in Primates and Humans: Mechanisms and Evolution (pp. 209–232). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bicca-Marques, J. C. 2000. Cognitive Aspects of Within-Patch Foraging Decisions in Wild Diurnal and Nocturnal New World Monkeys. PhD thesis, University of Illinois, Urbana. Available from: University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, MI: 9955588.Google Scholar
  6. Bicca-Marques, J. C. 2003. Sexual selection and foraging behavior in male and female tamarins and marmosets. In C. B. Jones (ed.), Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Primates: New Perspectives and Directions (pp. 455–475). Norman: American Society of Primatologists.Google Scholar
  7. Bicca-Marques, J. C., and Garber, P. A. 2003. Experimental field study of the relative costs and benefits to wild tamarins (Saguinus imperator and S. fuscicollis) of exploiting contestable food patches as single- and mixed-species troops. Am. J. Primatol. 60:139–153.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bicca-Marques, J. C., and Garber, P. A. 2004. The use of spatial, visual, and olfactory information during foraging in wild nocturnal and diurnal anthropoids: A field experiment comparing Aotus, Callicebus, and Saguinus. Am. J. Primatol. 62:171–187.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bicca-Marques, J. C., and Garber, P. A. 2005. Use of social and ecological information in tamarin foraging decisions. Int. J. Primatol. 26:1321–1344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Box, H. O., Röhrhuber, B., and Smith, P. 1995. Female tamarins (Saguinus – Callitrichidae) feed more successfully than males in unfamiliar foraging tasks. Behav. Proc. 34:3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Box, H. O., and Russon, A. E. 2004. Socially mediated learning among monkeys and apes: some comparative perspectives. In L. J. Rogers and G. Kaplan (eds.), Comparative Vertebrate Cognition, pp. 97–140. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
  12. Bugnyar, T., and Heinrich, B. 2006. Pilfering ravens, Corvus corax, adjust their behavior to social context and identity of competitiors. Anim. Cogn. 9:369–376.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Caine, N. G. 1993. Flexibility and co-operation as unifying themes in Saguinus social organization and behavior: The role of predation pressures. In A. B. Rylands (ed.), Marmosets and Tamarins: Systematics, Behaviour, and Ecology (pp. 200–219). Oxford: xford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Cambefort, J. P. 1981. A comparative study of culturally transmitted patterns of feeding habits in the chacma baboon, Papio ursinus and the vervet monkey, Cercopithecus aethiops. Folia Primatol. 36:243–263.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chapman, C. A. 1990. Association patterns of spider monkeys: The influence of ecology and sex on social organization. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 26:409–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chapman, C. A., and Chapman, L. J. 2000. Determinants of group size in primates: The importance of travel costs. In S. Boinski and P. A. Garber (eds.), On the Move: How and Why Animals Travel in Groups (pp. 24–42). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  17. Chapman, C. A., and Lefebvre, L. 1990. Manipulating foraging group size: spider monkey food calls at fruiting trees. Anim. Behav. 39:891–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Coussi-Korbel, S., and Fragaszy, D. M. 1995. On the relation between social dynamics and social learning. Anim. Behav. 50:1441-1453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Deus, C. E., Weigand Junior, R., Kageyama, P. Y., Viana, V. W., Ferraz, P. A., Nogueira-Borges, H. B., Almeida, M. C., Silveira, M., Vicente, C. R., and Andrade, P. H. 1993. Comportamento de 28 espécies arbóreas tropicais sob diferentes regimes de luz em Rio Branco, AC. Rio Branco: UFAC/PZ.Google Scholar
  20. Dias, L. G., and Strier, K. B. 2003. Effects of group size on ranging patterns in Brachyteles arachnoides hypoxanthus. Int. J. Primatol. 24:209–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. DiBitetti, M. S., and Janson, C. H. 2001. Social foraging and the finder’s share in capuchin monkeys, Cebus apella. Anim. Behav. 62:47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. DiFiore, A., and Campbell, C. J. 2007. The atelines: variation in ecology, behavior, and social organization. In C. J. Campbell, A. Fuentes, K. C. MacKinnon, M. Panger and S. K. Bearder (eds.), Primates in Perspective pp. 155–185. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Digby, L. J., Ferrari, S. F., and Saltzman, W. 2007. Callitrichines: The role of competition in cooperatively breeding species. In C. J. Campbell, A. Fuentes, K. C. MacKinnon, M. Panger and S. K. Bearder (eds.), Primates in Perspective (pp. 85–105). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Dominy, N. J., Garber, P. A., Bicca-Marques, J. C., and Azevedo-Lopes, M. A. O. 2003. Do female tamarins use visual cues to detect fruit rewards more successfully than do males? Anim. Behav. 66:829–837.Google Scholar
  25. Dominy, N. J., Lucas, P. W., Osorio, D., and Yamashita, N. 2001. The sensory ecology of primate food perception. Evol. Anthropol. 10:171–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dubuc, C., and Chapais, B. 2007. Feeding competition in Macaca fascicularis: an assessment of the early arrival tactic. Int. J. Primatol. 28:357–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Galef Jr, B. G. 1991. Information centers of Norway rats: sites for information exchange and information parasitism. Anim. Behav. 41:295–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Garber, P. A. 1988. Foraging decisions during nectar feeding by tamarin monkeys (Saguinus mystax and Saguinus fuscicollis, Callitrichidae, Primates) in Amazonian Peru. Biotropica 20:100–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Garber, P. A. 1989. Role of spatial memory in primate foraging patterns: Saguinus mystax and Saguinus fuscicollis. Am. J. Primatol. 19:203–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Garber, P. A. 1997. One for all and breeding for one: cooperation and competition as a tamarin reproductive strategy. Evol. Anthropol. 5:187–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Garber, P. A. 2000. Evidence for the use of spatial, temporal, and social information by primate foragers. In S. Boinski and P. A. Garber (eds.), On the Move: How and Why Animals Travel in Groups (pp. 261–289). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  32. Garber, P. A., and Bicca-Marques, J. C. 2002. Evidence of predator sensitive foraging in small- and large-scale space in free-ranging tamarins (Saguinus fuscicollis, Saguinus imperator, and Saguinus mystax). In L. E. Miller (ed.), Eat or be Eaten: Predator Sensitive Foraging in Primates (pp. 138–153). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Garber, P. A., and Brown, E. 2006. Use of landmark cues to locate feeding sitesin wild capuchin monkeys (Cebus capucinus): an experimental field study. In A. Estrada, P. A. Garber, M. Pavelka and L. Luecke (eds.), New Perspectives in the Study of Mesoamerican Primates pp. 311–332. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Garber, P. A., and Dolins, F. L. 1996. Testing learning paradigms in the field: evidence for use of spatial and perceptual information and rule-based foraging in wild moustached tamarins. In M. Norconk, A. L. Rosenberger and P. A. Garber (eds.), Adaptive Radiation of Neotropical Primates (pp. 201–216). New York, Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  35. Garber, P. A., and Paciulli, L. M. 1997. Experimental field study of spatial memory and learning in wild capuchin monkeys (Cebus capucinus). Folia Primatol. 68:236–253.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Giraldeau, L. A., and Caraco, T. 2000. Social Foraging Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Goldizen, A. W., Terborgh, J., Cornejo, F., Porras, D. T., and Evans, R. 1988. Seasonal food shortage, weight loss, and the timing of births in saddle-back tamarins (Saguinus fuscicollis). J. Anim. Ecol. 57:893–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Gotelli, N. J., and Ellison, A. M. 2004. A Primer of Ecological Statistics. Sunderland: Sinauer.Google Scholar
  39. Heymann, E. W. 1996. Social behavior of wild moustached tamarins, Saguinus mystax, at Estacion Biologica Quebrada Blanco, Peruvian Amazon. Am. J. Primatol. 38:101–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hunt, G. R., Rutledge, R. B., and Gray, R. D. 2006. The right tool for the job: what strategies do wild New Caledonian crows use? Anim. Cogn. 9:307–316.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Janson, C. 1985. Aggressive competition and individual food consumption in wild brown capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 18:125–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Janson, C. H. 1996. Toward an experimental socioecology of primates: examples from Argentine brown capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella nigritus). In M. Norconk, A. L. Rosenberger, and P. A. Garber (eds.), Adaptive Radiation of Neotropical Primates (pp. 309–325). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  43. Lehner, P. N. 1996. Handbook of Ethological Methods. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Leigh, S. R. 2004. Brain growth, life history, and cognition in primate and human evolution. Am. J. Primatol. 62:139–164.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Martin, P., and Bateson, P. 1993. Measuring Behaviour: An Introductory Guide. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Milton, K. 2000. Quo vadis? Tactics of food search and group movement in primates and other animals. In S. Boinski and P. A. Garber (eds.), On the Move: How and Why Animals Travel in Groups (pp. 375–417). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  47. Mottley, K., and Giraldeau, L. A. 2000. Experimental evidence that group foragers can converge on predicted producer-scrounger equilibria. Anim. Behav. 60:341–350.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Ottoni, E. B., Resende, B. D., and Izar, P. 2005. Watching the best nutcrackers: what capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) know about others’ tool-using skills. Anim. Cogn. 8:215–219.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ranta, E., Peuhkuri, N., Laurila, A., Rita, H., and Metcalfe, N. B. 1996. Producers, scroungers and foraging group structure. Anim. Behav. 51:171–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Reader, S. M., and Laland, K. N. 2002. Social intelligence, innovation, and enhanced brain size in primates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:4436–4441.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Santos, F. G. A., Salas, E. R., Bicca-Marques, J. C., Calegaro-Marques, C., and Farias, E. M. P. 1999. Cloridrato de tiletamina associado com cloridrato de zolazepam na tranquilização e anestesia de calitriquídeos (Mammalia, Primates). Arq. Brasil. Méd. Vet. Zootec. 51:539–545.Google Scholar
  52. Stone, A. I. 2007. Age and seasonal effects on predation-sensitive foraging in squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus): a field experiment. Am. J. Primatol. 59:127–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Strier, K. B., Mendes, F. D. C., Rimoli, J., and Rimoli, A. O. 1993. Demography and social structure of one group of muriquis (Brachyteles arachnoids). Int. J. Primatol. 14:513–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Symington, M. M. 1988. Demography, ranging patterns, and activity budgets of black spider monkeys (Ateles paniscus chamek) in the Manu National Park, Peru. Am. J. Primatol. 15:45–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Terborgh, J. 1983. Five New World Primates: A Study in Comparative Ecology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Tomasello, M., and Call, J. 1997. Primate Cognition. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Valero, A., and Byrne, R. W. 2007. Spider monkey ranging patterns in Mexican subtropical forest: do travel routes reflect planning? Anim. Cogn. 10:305–315.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Valone, T. J. 1989. Group foraging, public information, and patch estimation. Oikos 56:357–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Valone, T. J., and Giraldeau, L. A. 1993. Patch estimation by group foragers: what information is used? Anim. Behav. 45:721–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. van Roosmalen, M. G. M. 1985. Habitat preferences, diet, feeding strategy and social organization of the black spider monkey (Ateles paniscus paniscus Linnaeus 1758) in Surinam. Acta Amazon. 15:1–238.Google Scholar
  61. van Schaik, C. P. 1989. The ecology of social relationships amongst female primates. In V. Standen and R. A. Foley (eds.), Comparative Socioecology (pp. 195–218). Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  62. Vickery, W. L., Giraldeau, L. A., Templeton, J. J., Kramer, D. L., and Chapman, C. A. 1991. Producers, scroungers, and group foraging. Am. Nat. 137:847–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Visalberghi, E. 1994. Learning processes and feeding behavior in monkeys. In B. G. Galef Jr., M. Mainardi, and P. Valsecchi (eds.), Behavioral Aspects of Feeding (pp. 257–270). Chur: Harwood Academic.Google Scholar
  64. Watanabe, S., and Huber, L. 2006. Animal logics: decisions in the absence of human language. Anim. Cogn. 9:235–245.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Whiten, A., and Byrne, R. W. 1997. Machiavellian Intelligence II: Extension and Evaluations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul A. Garber
    • 1
  • Júlio César Bicca-Marques
  • Maria Aparecida de O. Azevedo-Lopes
  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUSA

Personalised recommendations