Calcium Phosphate Nanoparticles: Toxicology and Lymph Node Targeting for Cancer Metastasis Prevention

  • Rajesh A. Pareta
Part of the Nanostructure Science and Technology book series (NST)


Applications of nanoparticles in biology are rapidly developing areas in nanomedicine. In cancer therapy, nanoparticles are being used for the detection, diagnosis, and imaging of tumors. Calcium phosphate has long been used as a bone substitute biomaterial and is FDA approved. It is biocompatible, easy to synthesize and relatively cheap. Due to these favorable conditions, it has been investigated for numerous drug delivery of anti-tumor drug applications. Tumor metastases are a major health issue before and after surgical removal of a tumor. Presently, chemotherapy is being used to tackle metastases, but an anti-tumor drug does not differentiate between healthy tissue and tumors. It simply kills all cells it interacts with, and hence there is a need to develop an effective targeted drug delivery system which only releases the drug in tumor cell conditions. Anti-tumor drugs can be easily adsorbed onto the surface of calcium phosphates through electrostatic interactions. Calcium phosphate nanoparticles dissolve in the acidic micro-environment of the tumor, thus, releasing the drug which eventually kills the tumor cells. Most importantly, the calcium phosphate nanoparticles can be targeted to the sentinel lymph node where they can probe tumor metastases. This chapter will cover the history and future promises of using calcium phosphate nanoparticles to treat cancer, including its safety and toxicity in such applications.


Sentinel Lymph Node Drug Release Lymphatic Vessel Calcium Phosphate Lymphatic Capillary 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The author would like to thank the Susan G. Komen Foundation which supplied funds to carry out some of the work presented here.


  1. Alitalo K, Tammela T, Petrova TV (2005) Lymphangiogenesis in development and human disease. Nature 438:946–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barroug A, Kuhn LT, Gerstenfeld LC, Glimcher MJ (2004) Interactions of cisplatin with calcium phosphate nanoparticles: in vitro controlled adsorption and release. J Orthopedic Res 22: 703–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bulte JWM (2005) Magnetic nanoparticles as markers for cellular MR imaging. J Magn Magn Mater 289:423–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dadras SS, Paul T, Bertoncini J, Brown LF, Muzikansky A, Jackson DG, Ellwanger U, Garbe C, Mihm MC, Detmar M (2003) Tumor lymphangiogenesis: a novel prognostic indicator for cutaneous melanoma metastasis and survival. Am J Pathol 162:1951–1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Denekamp J. (1999) The tumour microcirculation as a target in cancer therapy: a clearer perspective. Eur J Clin Invest 29:733–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fisher B, Fisher ER (1966) The interrelationship of hematogenous and lymphatic tumor cell dissemination. Surg, Gynecol Obstet 122:791–798.Google Scholar
  7. Hall FT, Freeman JL, Asa SL, Jackson DG, Beasley NJ (2003) Intratumoral lymphatics and lymph node metastases in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Arch Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg 129: 716–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hashida M, Egawa M, Muranishi S, Sezaki, H (1997) Role of intra-muscular administration of water-in-oil emulsions as a method for increasing the delivery of anticancer agents to regional lymphatics. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 5:223–239.Google Scholar
  9. Jussila L, Alitalo K (2002) Vascular growth factors and lymphangiogenesis. Physiol Rev 82: 673–700.Google Scholar
  10. Kyzas PA, Geleff S, Batistatou A, Agnantis NJ, Stefanou D. (2005) Evidence for lymphangiogenesis and its prognostic implications in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. J Pathol 206:170–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lebugle A, Rodrigues A, Bonnevialle P, Voigt JJ, Canal P, Rodriguez F (2002) Study of implantable calcium phosphate systems for the slow release of methotrexate. Biomaterials 23:3517–3522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Maula SM, Luukkaa M, Grenman R, Jackson D, Jalkanen S, Ristamaki R (2003) Intratumoral lymphatics are essential for the metastatic spread and prognosis in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck region. Cancer Res 63:1920–1926.Google Scholar
  13. Muranishi S (1991) Drug targeting towards the lymphatics. Adv Drug Res 21:1–38.Google Scholar
  14. Nakamoto Y, Fujiwara M, Noguchi T, Kimura T, Muranishi S, Sezaki H (1975) Studies on pharmaceutical modification of anticancer agent. I. Enhancement of lymphatic transport of mitomycin C by parenteral emulsions. Chem Pharm Bull 23:2232–2238.Google Scholar
  15. Oussoren C, Storm G (1998) Targeting to lymph nodes by subcutaneous administration of liposomes. Int J Pharm 162:39–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Parker RJ, Priester ER, Sieber SM (1982) Comparison of lymphatic uptake, metabolism, excretion and biodistribution of free and liposome entrapped [14C]cytosine ß-Image-arabinofuranoside following intraperitoneal administration to rats. Drug Metab Dispos 10:40–46Google Scholar
  17. Pepper MS (2001) Lymphangiogenesis and tumor metastasis: myth or reality? Clin Cancer Res 7:462–468.Google Scholar
  18. Reddy ST, Rehor A, Schmoekela HG, Hubbella JA, Swartz MA (2006) In vivo targeting of dendritic cells in lymph nodes with poly(propylene sulfide) nanoparticles. J Controlled Release 112:26–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Swartz MA (2001) The physiology of the lymphatic system. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 50:3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Swartz MA, Skobe M (2001) Lymphatic function, lymphangiogenesis, and cancer metastasis. Microscopy Res Tech 55:92–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tahara Y, Ishii Y (2002) Apatite cement containing cis-diamminedichloroplatinum implanted in rabbit femur for sustained release of the anticancer drug and bone formation. J Orthop Sci 6:556–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Thiele W, Sleeman JP (2006) Tumor-induced lymphangiogenesis: a target for cancer therapy? J Biotechnol 124:224–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Weinstein JN (1983) Target-direction of liposomes: Four strategies for attacking tumor cells. In: Chabner B (ed) Rational basis of chemotherapy. A.R. Diss, New York, pp 441–473.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of EngineeringBrown UniversityProvidenceUSA

Personalised recommendations