Physical Characteristics of Kazan Minor Showers as Determined by Correlations with the Arecibo UHF Radar

  • David D. Meisel
  • Johan KeroEmail author
  • Csilla Szasz
  • Vladimir Sidorov
  • Stan Briczinski
Chapter 2: Observation Techniques and Programs


In the northern hemisphere, the month of February is characterized by a lack of major meteor shower activity yet a number of weak minor showers are present as seen by the Kazan radar. Using the Feller transformation to obtain the distribution of true meteor velocities from the distribution of radial velocities enables the angle of incidence to be obtained for the single beam AO (Arecibo Observatory) data. Thus the loci of AO radiants become beam-centered circles on the sky and one can, with simple search routines, find where these circles intersect on radiants determined by other means. Including geocentric velocity as an additional search criterion, we have examined a set of February radiants obtained at Kazan for coincidence in position and velocity. Although some may be chance associations, only those events with probabilities of association > 0.5 have been kept. Roughly 90 of the Kazan showers have been verified in this way with mass, radius and density histograms derived from the AO results. By comparing these histograms with those of the “background” in which the minor showers are found, a qualitative scale of dynamical minor shower age can be formulated. Most of the showers are found outside the usual “apex” sporadic source areas where it is easiest to detect discrete showers with less confusion from the background.


Meteor shower Sporadic source AO Kazan HPLA Radar 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. S.J. Briczinski, C.-H. Wen, J.D. Mathews, J.F. Doherty, Q.-N. Zhou, Robust voltage fitting techniques for meteor Doppler determination. IEEE Trans. Geos. Remote Sens. 44 3490–3496 (2006)Google Scholar
  2. S.J. Briczinski, J.D. Mathews, D.D. Meisel, Applications of an automated micrometeor event searching routine. JASTP (2007a), in reviewGoogle Scholar
  3. S.J. Briczinski, J.D. Mathews, D.D. Meisel, C.J. Heinselman, A comparison of automated-search meteor results from radar observations at AMISR Poker Flat, Søndrestrøm and Arecibo’. GRL (2007b), submittedGoogle Scholar
  4. R.S. Burington, D.C. May, Handbook of Probability and Statistics. (Handbook Publishers, Sandusky, 1953)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. J.L. Chau, R.F. Woodman, F. Galindo, Sporadic meteor sources as observed by the Jicamarca high-power large-aperture VHF radar. Icarus 188, 162–174 (2007)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. A.F. Cook, A working list of meteor streams. NASA Spec Publ 319, 183–191 (1973)ADSGoogle Scholar
  7. J.D. Drummond, The D discriminant and near-earth asteroid streams. Icarus 146, 453–475 (2000)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  8. W. Feller, An introduction to probability theory and its applications, vol. 2 (Wiley, New York 1966), pp. 31–32Google Scholar
  9. D. Janches, D.D. Meisel, J.D. Mathews, Orbital properties of the Arecibo micrometeoroids at earth interception. Icarus. 150, 206–218 (2001)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. J. Jones, P. Brown, Sporadic meteor radiant distribution: orbital survey results. MNRAS 265, 524–532 (1993)ADSGoogle Scholar
  11. J.D. Mathews, Radio science issues surrounding HF/VHF/UHF radar meteor studies. JASTP 66, 285–299 (2004)ADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. J.D. Mathews, J. Doherty, C.-H.Wen, S.J. Briczinski, D.Janches, D.D. Meisel, An update on UHF radar meteor observations and associated signal processing techniques at Arecibo Observatory. JASTP 65, 1139–1149 (2003)ADSGoogle Scholar
  13. D.D. Meisel, D. Janches, J.D. Mathews, Extrasolar micrometeors radiating from the vicinity of the local interstellar bubble. ApJ 567, 323–341 (2002a)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. D.D. Meisel, D. Janches, J.D. Mathews, The size distribution of Arecibo interstellar particles and its implications. ApJ 579, 895–904 (2002b)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  15. V. Sidorov, S. Kalabanov, S. Sidorova, I. Filin, Microshower Structure of the Meteor Complex. EM&P 95, 155–164 (2004a)ADSGoogle Scholar
  16. V. Sidorov, S. Kalabanov, S. Sidorova, I. Filin, T. Filimonova, Associations of meteor microshowers or as the Kazan radar “SEES” radiants on northern celestial hemisphere. EM&P 95, 165–179 (2004b)ADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • David D. Meisel
    • 1
  • Johan Kero
    • 2
    Email author
  • Csilla Szasz
    • 2
  • Vladimir Sidorov
    • 3
  • Stan Briczinski
    • 4
  1. 1.SUNY GeneseoGeneseoUSA
  2. 2.Swedish Institute of Space PhysicsKirunaSweden
  3. 3.Kazan State UniversityKazanRussia
  4. 4.Penn State UniversityState CollegeUS

Personalised recommendations