Introduction—History, Assumptions, and Approaches

  • Hans Lambers
  • F. Stuart ChapinIII
  • Thijs L. Pons


Plant ecophysiology is an experimental science that seeks to describe the physiological mechanisms underlying ecological observations. In other words, ecophysiologists, or physiological ecologists, address ecological questions about the controls over the growth, reproduction, survival, abundance, and geographical distribution of plants, as these processes are affected by interactions of plants with their physical, chemical, and biotic environment. These ecophysiological patterns and mechanisms can help us understand the functional significance of specific plant traits and their evolutionary heritage.


Plant Water Relation Cytisus Scoparius Plant Ecophysiology Evolutionary Heritage Scotch Broom 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Billings, W.D. 1973. Arctic and alpine vegetation: Similarities, differences, and susceptibility to disturbance. BioScience 23: 697–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Billings, W.D., Godfrey, P.J., Chabot, B.F., & Bourque, D.P. 1971. Metabolic acclimation to temperature in arctic and alpine ecotypes of Oxyria digyna. Arc. Alp. Res. 3: 277–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Blackman, V.H. 1919. The compound interest law and plant growth. Ann. Bot. 33: 353–360.Google Scholar
  4. Boyer, J.S. 1985. Water transport. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 36: 473–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chapin III, F.S., 2003. Effects of plant traits on ecosystem and regional processes: A conceptual framework for predicting the consequences of global change. Ann. Bot. 91: 455–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Clarkson, D.T. 1966. Aluminium tolerance in species within the genus Agrostis. J. Ecol. 54: 167–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Crawford, R.M.M. 1978. Biochemical and ecological similarities in marsh plants and diving animals. Naturwissenschaften 65: 194–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ellenberg, H. 1953. Physiologisches und ökologisches Verhalten derselben Pflanzanarten. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. 65: 351–361.Google Scholar
  9. Field, C.B., Lobell, D.B., Peters, H.A., & Chiariello, N.R. 2007. Feedbacks of terrestrial ecosystems to climate change. Annu. Rev. Env. Res. 32: 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Foley, J.A., Costa, M.H., Delire, C., Ramankutty, N., & Snyder. P. 2003. Green surprise? How terrestrial ecosystems could affect earth's climate. Front. Ecol. Environ. 1: 38–44.Google Scholar
  11. Gould, S.J. & Lewontin, R.C. 1979. The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: A critique of the adaptationists programme. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 205: 581–598.Google Scholar
  12. Grime J.P. 1979. Plant strategies and vegetation processes. Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
  13. Hammond, P.M. 1995. The current magnitude of biodiversity. In: Global biodiversity assessment, V.H. Heywood (ed.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 113–138.Google Scholar
  14. Holdridge, L.R. 1947. Determination of world plant formations from simple climatic data. Science 105: 367–368.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Huston, M.A. 1994. Biological diversity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  16. Lambers, H. & Poorter, H. 1992. Inherent variation in growth rate between higher plants: A search for physiological causes and ecological consequences. Adv. Ecol. Res. 22: 187–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Larcher, W. 1976. Ökologie der Pflanzen. Ulmer, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  18. Mooney, H.A. 1972. The carbon balance of plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 3: 315–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mooney, H.A. & Dunn, E.L. 1970. Convergent evolution of Mediterranean-climate sclerophyll shrubs. Evolution 24: 292–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pearsall, W.H. 1938. The soil complex in relation to plant communities. J. Ecol. 26: 180–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Reich, P.B., Walters, M.B., & Ellsworth, D.S. 1997. From tropics to tundra: Global convergence in plant functioning. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 94: 13730–13734.Google Scholar
  22. Schimper, A.F.W. 1898. Pflanzengeographie und physiologische Grundlage. Verlag von Gustav Fischer, Jena.Google Scholar
  23. Vrba, E.S. & Gould, S.J. 1986. The hierarchical expansion of sorting and selection: Sorting and selection cannot be equated. Paleobiology 12: 217–228.Google Scholar
  24. Walter, H. 1973. Die Vegetation der Erde in ökophysiologischer Betrachtung. 3rd ed. Gutsav Fisher Verlag, Jena.Google Scholar
  25. Walter, H. 1974. Die Vegetation der Erde. Gustav Fisher Verlag, Jena.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hans Lambers
    • 1
  • F. Stuart ChapinIII
    • 2
  • Thijs L. Pons
    • 3
  1. 1.The University of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia
  2. 2.University of AlaskaFairbanksUSA
  3. 3.Utrecht UniversityThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations