Marketing Models for Electronic Commerce

  • Randolph E. Bucklin
Part of the International Series in Operations Research & Management Science book series (ISOR, volume 121)


The Internet continues to grow dramatically as a vehicle for facilitating commerce. For example, online sales transactions in the U.S. consumer sector will pass $200 billion in calendar year 2007, growing at a rate of 17 percent per year (comScore 2007). Omitting travel (the largest single category for Internet commerce), online retail sales account for about five percent of the total retail sales in the United States. The success and continued rapid growth of e-commerce (in both consumer and business-to-business sectors), makes it likely that marketing managers working to improve decision making will increasingly seek out modeling approaches suitable for use in this domain. The objective of this chapter is provide an overview of some of the key developments and advances in the application of marketing models to electronic commerce. Given that e-commerce began in earnest little more than a decade ago, all of these advances are quite recent. Indeed, almost all have been...


Online Retailer Page View Banner Advertising Visit Duration Visit Behavior 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Ansari, A., S. Essegaier, R. Kohli. 2000. Internet Recommendation Systems. Journal of Marketing Research 37(August) 363–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ansari, A., C.F. Mela. 2003. E-Customization. Journal of Marketing Research 40 (May) 131–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ansari, A., C.F. Mela, S.A. Neslin. 2008. Customer Channel Migration. Journal of Marketing Research, 45(February) 60–76.Google Scholar
  4. Biyalogorsky, E., P. Naik. 2003. Clicks and Mortar: The Effect of On-line Activities on Off-line Sales. Marketing Letters 14(1) 21–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bronnenberg, B.J., W. Vanhonacker. 1996. Limited Choice Sets, Local Price Response, and Implied Measures of Price Competition. Journal of Marketing Research 33(May) 163–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brynjolfsson, Erik, Yu (Jeffrey) Hu, M,D. Smith. 2003. Consumer Surplus in the Digital Economy: Estimating the Value of Increased Product Variety at Online Booksellers. Management Science 49(11) 1580–1596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bucklin, R.E., J.M. Lattin, A. Ansari, S. Gupta, D. Bell, E. Coupey, J.D.C. Little, C. Mela, A. Montgomery, J. Steckel. 2002. Choice and the Internet: From Clickstream to Research Stream. Marketing Letters 13(3) 245–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bucklin, R.E., C. Sismeiro. 2003. A Model of Web Site Browsing Behavior Estimated on Clickstream Data. Journal of Marketing Research 40(August) 249–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chatterjee, P., D.L. Hoffman, T.P. Novak. 2003. Modeling the Clickstream: Implications for Web-Based Advertising Efforts. Marketing Science 22(4) 520–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chevalier, J.A., D. Mayzlin. 2006. The Effect of Word of Mouth on Sales: Online Book Reviews. Journal of Marketing Research 43(August) 345–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chintagunta, P.K. 1993. Investigating Purchase Incidence, Brand Choice and Purchase Quantity Decisions of Households. Marketing Science 12(2) 184–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. comScore Networks. 2007. Retail E-Commerce Climbs 23 Percent in Q2 Versus Year Ago., accessed August 27, 2007.
  13. Danaher, P.J., G.M. Mullarkey, S. Essegaier. 2006. Factors Affecting Web Site Visit Duration: A Cross-Domain Analysis. Journal of Marketing Research 43(May) 182–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Demers, E., B. Lev. 2001. A Rude Awakening: Internet Shakeout in 2000. Review of Accounting Studies 6(August) 331–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Drèze, X., A. Bonfrer. 2006. An Empirical Investigation of the Impact of Communication Timing on Customer Equity. working paper, Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  16. Drèze, X., F.-X. Hussherr. 2003. Internet Advertising: Is Anybody Watching? Journal of Interactive Marketing 17(4) 8–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Edelman, B., M. Ostrovsky, M. Schwarz. 2007. Internet Advertising and the Generalized Second Price Auction: Selling Billions of Dollars’ Worth of Keywords. American Economic Review 97(1) 242–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Godes, D., D. Mayzlin. 2004. Using Online Conversations to Study Word-of-Mouth Communication. Marketing Science 23(4) 545–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hanssens, D.M., L.J. Parsons, R.L. Schultz. 2001. Market Response Models: Econometric and Time Series Analysis, 2 nd edition, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.Google Scholar
  20. Häubl, G., V. Trifts. 2000. Consumer Decision-Making in Online Shopping Environments: The Effects of Interactive Decision Aids. Marketing Science 19(1) 4–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ilfeld, J. S., R.S. Winer. 2002. Generating Website Traffic. Journal of Advertising Research (September–October) 49–61.Google Scholar
  22. Internet Advertising Bureau. 2007. Internet Advertising Revenues Grow in ’06 ., accessed August 27, 2007.
  23. Johnson, E.J., S. Bellman, G.L. Lohse. 2003. Cognitive Lock-In and the Power Law of Practice. Journal of Marketing 67(April) 62–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Johnson, E.J., W.W. Moe, P.S. Fader, S. Bellman, J. Lohse. 2004. On the Depth and Dynamics of Online Search Behavior. Management Science 50(3) 299–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kumar, V., R. Venkatesan. 2005. Who are the Multichannel Shoppers and How Do They Perform?: Correlates of Multichannel Shopping Behavior. Journal of Interactive Marketing 19(2) 44–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lal, R., M. Sarvary. 1999. When and How is the Internet Likely to Decrease Price Competition?” Marketing Science 18(4) 485–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lewis, M., V. Singh, S. Fay. 2006. An Empirical Study of the Impact of Nonlinear Shipping and Handling Fees on Purchase Incidence and Expenditure Decisions. Marketing Science 25(1) 51–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Manchanda, P., J.-P. Dubé, K. Yong Goh, P.K. Chintagunta. 2006. The Effect of Banner Advertising on Internet Purchasing. Journal of Marketing Research 43(February) 98–108.Google Scholar
  29. Mandel, N., E.J. Johnson. 2002. When Web Pages Influence Choice: Effects of Visual Primes on Experts and Novices. Journal of Consumer Research 29(September) 235–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mangalindan, M.. 2007. Web Stores Tap Product Reviews. Wall Street Journal (September 11), B3.Google Scholar
  31. Mayzlin, D. 2006. Promotional Chat on the Internet. Marketing Science 25(2) 155–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Moe, W.W. 2003. Buying, Searching, or Browsing: Differentiating Between Online Shoppers Using In-Store Navigational Clickstream. Journal of Consumer Psychology 13(1&2) 29–39.Google Scholar
  33. Moe, W.W. 2006. An Empirical Two-Stage Choice model with Varying Decision Rules Applied to Internet Clickstream Data. Journal of Marketing Research 38(November) 680–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Moe, W.W., P.S. Fader. 2004a. Capturing Evolving Visit Behavior in Clickstream Data. Journal of Interactive Marketing 18(1) 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moe, W.W., P.S. Fader. 2004b. Dynamic Conversion Behavior at e-Commerce Sites. Management Science 50(3) 326–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Montgomery, A.L., K. Hosanagar, R. Krishnan,, K.B. Clay. 2004a. Designing a Better Shopbot. Management Science 50(2) 189–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Montgomery, A.L., S. Li, K. Srinivasan, John C. Liechty. 2004b. Modeling Online Browsing and Path Analysis Using Clickstream Data. Marketing Science 23(4) 579–595.Google Scholar
  38. Murray, K., G. Häubl. 2008. Interactive Consumer Decision Aids. in Handbook of Marketing Decision Models, Berend Wierenga, ed., Springer Science + Business Media this volume, chapter 3, p 55–77.Google Scholar
  39. Park, Y.-H., P.S. Fader. 2004. Modeling Browsing Behavior at Multiple Websites. Marketing Science 23(3) 280–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Roberts, J.H., J.M. Lattin. 1991. Development and Testing of a Model of Consideration Set Composition. Journal of Marketing Research 28(November) 429–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rutz, O.J., R.E. Bucklin. 2007. From Generic to Branded: A Model of Spillover Dynamics in Paid Search Advertising. working paper, School of Management, Yale University.Google Scholar
  42. Senecal, S., J. Nantel. 2004. The Influence of Online Product Recommendations on Consumers’ Online Choices. Journal of Retailing 80 159–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Silva-Risso, J.M., R.E. Bucklin, D.G. Morrison. 1999. A Decision Support System for Planning Manufacturers’ Sales Promotion Calendars. Marketing Science 18(3) 274–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sismeiro, C., R.E. Bucklin. 2004. Modeling Purchase Behavior at an E-Commerce Web Site: A Task-Completion Approach. Journal of Marketing Research 41(August) 306–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Smith, M.D., E. Brynjolfsson. 2001. Consumer Decision-Making at an Internet Shopbot: Brand Still Matters. Journal of Industrial Economics 99(4) 541–558.Google Scholar
  46. Tellis, G.J., F.S. Zufryden. 1995. Tackling the Retailer Decision Maze: Which Brands to Discount, How Much, When and Why? Marketing Science 14(3) 271–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Trusov, M., R.E. Bucklin. 2006. Should We Hope You Shopped Around? Effects of Prior Internet Search on E-Commerce Site Activity. working paper, Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
  48. Verhoef, P.C., S.A. Neslin, B. Vroomen. 2007. Multichannel Customer Management: Understanding the Research-Shopper Phenomenon. International Journal of Research in Marketing 24(2) 129–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wu, J., A. Rangaswamy. 2003. A Fuzzy Set Model of Search and Consideration with an Application to an Online Market. Marketing Science 22(3) 411–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zauberman, G. 2003. The Intertemporal Dynamics of Consumer Lock-In. Journal of Consumer Research 30(December) 405–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zhang, J., L. Krishnamurthi. 2004. Customizing Promotions in Online Stores. Marketing Science 23(4) 561–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UCLA Anderson SchoolLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations