Maize breeders during the hybrid era (1939 to present) have been extremely successful in making continuous genetic improvement in commercial grain yield (Fig. 1). Commercial grain yield in the US increased from about 1,300 kg ha−1 in 1939 to 7,800 kg ha-1 in 2005, about 99 kg ha−1 year−1, with similar gains observed in Canada during the hybrid era (80 kg ha−1 year−1) (Lee and Tollenaar 2007). This 6-fold increase in grain yields over a 60 year period is unprecedented among cereals or oil seeds.
The USDA began collecting data on yield in 1862 and from that time maize yields did not change until the 1930s when they began an upward trend which has showed no signs of abating (Tracy et al. 2004). Prior to 1909, nearly all maize breeding was done by farmers or farmer/seedsmen, who used mass selection as their main breeding method (Hallauer et al. 1988). Mass selection is a method in which the best ears from the best plants would be selected from a population of maize plants. While this technique has been used since the domestication of plants, it is not very effective for traits with low heritability such as yield. Some farmer/ breeders experimented with ear-to-row selection which entails growing and evaluating families derived from individual open-pollinated ears. While this method can be successful in improving traits of low heritability, the lack of knowledge of statistics and experimental design limited the success of this method and yields continued unchanged. Also contributing to static yields were the maize shows that were prevalent during the late 19th and early 20th centuries. In these shows, 10 ears were shown by each exhibitor and those groups that were most uniform and conformed to some ideal type in the mind of the judge were chosen as the winners, with no attention paid to yield or other economic traits. It is likely that the emphasis on uniformity in these competitions contributed to inbreeding and further suppressed any yield increases (Hallauer et al. 1988). A third breeding approach attempted during the 19th century was varietal hybridization in which two open-pollinated cultivars would be hybridized and the resulting hybrid would be grown for seed (Beal 1877). Some crosses did reveal reasonable amounts of heterosis (10–15%). But this yield increase was not enough to justify the extra energy and expense of producing the hybrid seed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Abedon BG, Darrah LL, Tracy WF (1999) Developmental changes associated with divergent selection for rind penetrometer resistance in the MoSCSS maize Synthetic. Crop Sci 39:108–114
Barloy D, Beckert M (1993) Improvement of regeneration ability of androgenetic embryos by early anther transfer in maize. Plant Cell Tissue Org Cult 33:45–50
Beal WJ (1877) Report of the professor of botany and horticulture. Michigan Board of Agric, Lansing, MI
Bernardo R (2002) Breeding for quantitative traits in plants. Stemma Press, Woodbury, MN
Boyer CD, Shannon JC (2003) Carbohydrates of the kernel. In: Ramstad PE, White P (eds) Corn chemistry and technology, 2nd edn. Am Assoc of Cereal Chemists, Minneapolis, pp 289–312
Bradley JP, Knittle KH, Troyer AF (1988) Statistical methods in seed corn product selection. J Prod Agric 1:34–38
Brown WL, Goodman MM (1977) Races of corn. In: Sprague GF (ed) Corn and corn improvement. Am Soc Agron, Madison, WI, pp 49–88
Bruce AB (1910) The Mendelian theory of heredity and the augmentation of vigor. Sci 32:627–628
Brunner S, Fengler K, Morgante M, Tingey S, Rafalski A (2005) Evolution of DNA sequence nonhomologies among maize inbreds. Plant Cell 17:343–360
Cardwell VB (1982) Fifty years of Minnesota corn production: Sources of yield increase. Agron J 74: 984–990
Carson ML, Balint-Kurti PJ, Blanco M, Millard M, Duvick S, Holley R, Hudyncia J, Goodman MM (2006) Registration of nine high-yielding tropical by temperate maize germplasm lines adapted for the southern USA. Crop Sci 46:1825–1826
Chalyk ST, Chebotar OD (2000) Regular segregation of four recessive marker genes among maternal haploids in maize. Plant Breeding 119:363–364
Chalyk ST, Bylich VG, Chebotar OD (1994) Transgressive segregation in the progeny of a cross between two inducers of maize maternal haploids. MNL 68:47
Coe EH (1959) A line of maize with high haploid frequency. Am Nat 93:381–382
Comstock R E, Robinson H F, Harvey PH (1949) A breeding procedure designed to make maximum use of both general and specific combining ability. J Am Soc Agron 41:360–367
Cress CE (1967) Reciprocal recurrent selection and modifications in simulated populations. Crop Sci 7:561–567
Crosbie TM, Eathington SR, Johnson GR, Edwards M, Reiter R, Stark S, Mohanty RG, Oyervides M, Buehler RE, Walker AK, Delannay R, Pershing JC, Hall MA, Lamkey KR (2006) Plant breeding: past, present, and future. In: Lamkey KR, Lee M (eds) Plant breeding: The Arnel R Hallauer international symposium. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp 3–50
Crow JF (1998) 90 years ago: the beginning of hybrid maize. Genet 148:923–928
Davenport CB (1908) Degeneration, albinism and inbreeding. Sci 28:454–455
Deimling S, Röeber FK, Geiger HH (1997) Methodik und genetik der in-vivo-haploideninduktion bei mais. Vortr Pflanzenzuchtg 38:203–224
Dudley JW, Lambert RJ (2004) 100 Generations of selection for oil and protein in corn. Plant Breeding Rev 24:80–110
Duvick DN (1984) Genetic contributions to yield gains of US hybrid maize, 1930–1980. In: Fehr WR (ed) Genetic contributions to yield of five major crop plants. CSSA special publications number 7 Crop Sci Soc Amer, Madison, WI, pp 15–47
Duvick DN (1989) Possible genetic causes of increased variability in US maize yield. In: Anderson JR, Hazel PBR (eds) Variability in grain yields: Implications for agricultural research and policy in developing countries. John Hopkins Univ Press, Baltimore, pp 147–156
Duvick DN (1992) Genetic contributions to advances in yield of US maize. Maydica 37:69–79
Duvick DN, Cassman KG (1999) Post–green revolution trends in yield potential of temperate maize in the north-central United States. Crop Sci 39:1622–1630
Duvick DN, Smith JSC, Cooper M (2004) Long term selection in a commercial hybrid maize program. Plant Breed Rev 24:109–151
East EM (1909) Inbreeding in corn, 1907. In: Connecticut Agric Exp Stn Rep, pp 419–428
El-Lakany MA, Russell WA (1971) Effectiveness of selection in successive generations of maize inbred progenies for improvement of hybrid yield. Crop Sci 11:703–706
Falconer DS (1981) Introduction to quantitative genetics, 2nd edn. Longman, London
Flint-Garcia SA, Jampatong C, Darrah LL, McMullen MD (2003) Quantitative trait locus analysis of stalk strength in four maize populations. Crop Sci 43:13–22
Forster BP, Heberle-Bors E, Kasha KJ, Touraev A (2007) The resurgence of haploids in higher plants. Trends in Plant Sci 12:1360–1385
Frey TJ, Coors JG, Shaver RD, Lauer JG, Eilert DT, Flannery PJ (2004) Selection for silage quality in the Wisconsin quality synthetic and related maize populations. Crop Sci 44:1200–1208
Fu H, Dooner HK (2002) Intraspecific violation of genetic colinerity and its implications in maize. PNAS 99:9573–9578
Gayen P, Madan JK, Kumar R, Sarkar KR (1994) Chromosome doubling in haploids through colchicine. MNL 68:65
Genovesi AD, Collins GB (1982) In vitro production of haploid plants of corn via anther culture. Crop Sci 22:1137–1144
Gerdes JT, Tracy WF (1993) Pedigree diversity within the Lancaster surecrop heterotic group of maize. Crop Sci 33:334–337
Gethi JG, Labate JA, Lamkey KR, Smith ME, Kresovich S (2002) SSR variation in important US maize inbred lines. Crop Sci 42:951–957
Goodman MM (1985) Exotic maize germplasm: status, prospects, and remedies. Iowa State J of Res 59:497–527
Goodman MM (1990) Genetic and germplasm stocks worth conserving. J of Hered 81:11–16
Goodman MM, Holley RN (1988) US maize germplasm: origin, limitations and alternatives. In: Russell N, Listman GM (eds) Recent advances in the conservation and utilization of genetic resources, Proceedings of the global maize germplasm workshop, CIMMYT, Mexico, pp 130–148
Graham GI, Wolff DW, Stuber CW (1997) Characterization of a yield quantitative trait locus on chromosome five of maize by fine mapping. Crop Sci 37:1601–1010
Hallauer AR, Miranda Fo JB (1988) Maize breeding, 2nd edn. Iowa State Univ Press, Ames, IA
Hallauer AR, Russell WA, Lamkey KR (1988) Corn breeding. In: Sprague GF, Dudley JW (eds) Corn and corn improvement 3rd edn. Am Soc of Agron, Madison, WI, pp 463–564
Hallauer AR, Ross AJ, Lee M (2004) Long term divergent selection for ear length in maize. Plant Breeding Rev 24:153–168
Jenkins MT (1935) The effect of inbreeding and of selection with inbred lines of maize upon the hybrids after successive generations of selfing Iowa State Coll J Sci 3:429–450
Jones DF (1918) The effects of inbreeding and crossbreeding on development. In: Conn Agric Exp Stn Bull 207, pp 5–100
Keeble F, Pellew C (1910) The mode of inheritance of stature and of time of flowering in peas (Pisum sativum). J Genet 1:47–56
Kermicle JL (1969) Androgenesis conditioned by a mutation in maize. Sci 166:1422–1424
Kucharik CJ (2006) A multidecadal trend of earlier corn planting in the central USA. Agron J 98:1544–1550
Lee EA, Tollenaar M (2007) Physiological basis of sucessful breeeding strategies for maize grain yield. Crop Sci 47(S3):S202–S215
Löffler CM, Wei J, Fast T, Gogerty J, Langton S, Bergman M, Merrill B, Cooper M (2005) Classification of maize environments using crop simulation and geographic information systems. Crop Sci 45:1708–1716
Lu H, Bernardo R (2001) Molecular marker diversity among current and historical maize inbreds. Theor Appl Genet 103:613–617
Maize GDB (2007) www.maizegdb.org verified Nov 17, 2007
Marshall SW, Tracy WF (2003) Sweet corn. In: Ramstad PE, White P (eds) Corn chemistry and technology. 2nd edn. Am Assoc Cereal Chemists, Minneapolis, MN, pp 537–569
Mikel MA, Dudley JW (2006) Evolution of North American dent corn from public to proprietary germplasm. Crop Sci 46:1193–1205
Peseitelli SM, Mitchell JC, Jones AM, Pareddy DR, Petolino JF (1989) High frequency androgenesis from isolated microspores of maize. Plant Cell Rep 7:673–676
Riedeman ES, Chandler MA, Tracy WF (2008) Seven cycles of divergent recurrent selection for vegetative phase change and indirect effects on resistance to common rust (Puccinia sorghi) and European corn borer (Ostrinia nubilalis). Submitted to Crop Sci
Röber FK, Gordillo GA, Geiger HH (2005) In vivo haploid production in maize — performance of new inducers and significance of double haploid lines in hybrid breeding. Maydica 50:275–283
Song R, Messing J (2003) Gene expression of a gene family in maize based on noncollinear haplotypes. PNAS 100:9055–9066
Sharkar KR, Coe EH (1966) A genetic analysis of the origin of maternal haploids in maize. Genet 54:453–464
Shull GH (1908) The composition of a field of maize. Amer Breeders' Assoc Rep 4:296–301
Shull GH (1909) A pureline method of corn breeding. Amer Breeders' Assoc Rep 5:51–59
Smith JSC, Smith OS (1989) The description and assessment of distances between inbred lines of maize. II. The utility of morphological, biochemical, and genetic descriptors and a scheme for the testing of distinctiveness between inbred lines. Maydica 34:141–150
Smith OS, Smith JSC, Bowen SL Tenborg RA, Wall SJ (1990) Similarities among a group of elite maize inbreds as measured by pedigree, F1 grain yield, grain yield, heterosis, and RFLPs. Theor Appl Genet 80:833–840
Sprague GF (1946) Early testing of inbred lines of corn. J Am Soc Agron 38:108–117
Tollenaar M, Lee EA (2002) Yield, potential yield, yield stability and stress tolerance in maize. Field Crops Res 75:161–170
Tracy WF (2000) Sweet corn. In: Hallauer AR (ed) Specialty corns, 2nd edn. CRC, Boca Raton, FL, pp 155–199
Tracy WF (2004) Breeding: the backcross method. In: Goodman RM (ed) Encyclopedia of crop science. Marcel Dekker, Inc, New York, pp 237–240
Tracy WF, Chandler MA (2006) The historical and biological basis of the concept of heterotic patterns in corn belt dent maize. In: Lamkey KR, Lee M (eds) Plant breeding: The Arnel R Hallauer international symposium. Blackwell Publishing, Ames, IA, pp 219–233
Tracy WF, Chang Y-M (2007) Effects of divergent selection for endosperm appearance in a sugary1 maize population. Maydica 52:71–79
Tracy WF, Goldman IL, Tiefenthaler AE, Schaber MA (2004) Trends in productivity of US crops and long-term selection. Plant Breeding Rev 24:89–108
Troyer AF (1996) Breeding widely adapted, popular maize hybrids. Euphytica 92:163–174
Troyer AF (1999) Background of U.S. hybrid corn. Crop Sci 39:601–626
Troyer AF (2000a) Temperate corn: background, behavior, and breeding. In: Hallauer AR (ed) Specialty corns, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 393–466
Troyer AF (2000b) Origins of modern corn hybrids. In: Wilkinson D (ed), Proceedings of the 55th annual corn and sorghum research conference. Am Seed Trade Assn, Washington DC, pp 27–42
Troyer AF (2004) Persistent and popular germplasm in seventy centuries of corn evolution. In: Smith CW, Betran J, Runge ECA (eds), CORN — Origin, history, technology, and production. John Wiley and Sons Inc, New Jersey, pp 133–231
Troyer AF (2008) Development of hybrid corn and the seed corn industry, this volume
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Science + Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lee, E.A., Tracy, W.F. (2009). Modern Maize Breeding. In: Bennetzen, J.L., Hake, S. (eds) Handbook of Maize. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77863-1_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77863-1_7
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-77862-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-77863-1
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)