Advertisement

Doubled Haploids

  • Hartwig H. Geiger

Doubled haploid (DH) maize lines can be produced by in vitro and in vivo techniques. The in vitro approach is focused on anther and microspore culture. However, most maize genotypes proved to be highly recalcitrant. Genetic analyses showed that in vitro androgenetic response is under complex multifactorial control. Despite good results with specific genotypes, the technique has not yet become a routine tool in maize research or breeding. In contrast, in vivo procedures could be improved considerably and have been widely applied during the last 10 – 15 years. In vivo induction of paternal haploids based on the ‘indeterminate gametophyte’ mutant has become a standard technique for transferring elite seed parent lines into cytoplasms that condition male sterility. Similarly, the induction of maternal haploids by pollination with specific inducer genotypes has become a routine procedure for large-scale DH line production. Both in vivo techniques are much less affected by donor genotypes than the in vitro procedures.

Progress achieved in the induction of maternal haploids pertains to the induction rate, easily screenable markers for haploid identification, chromosome doubling procedures, and handling of seedlings which survived chromosome doubling. In research, DH lines are mainly being used for mapping purposes and in breeding they are progressively replacing conventional inbred lines. Various DH line-based breeding schemes have been suggested, and computer software has been developed for optimizing the dimensioning of the schemes and for determining the relative merits of alternative breeding strategies. DH lines feature important advantages regarding quantitative genetic, operational, logistic, and economic aspects. The DH-line technology can therefore be considered as one of the most effective tools in modern maize genetics and breeding. The mechanism of in vivo induction of gynogenetic haploids is not yet fully understood. Most likely, one of the two inducer sperm cells is not fully functional yet fuses with the egg cell. During subsequent cell divisions, a degeneration process starts and the chromosomes get fragmented and finally are eliminated from the primordial cells leaving only maternal chromosomes. The second sperm cell fuses with the central cell leading to a regular triploid endosperm and a normal-sized functional seed.

Keywords

Double Haploid Microspore Culture Recurrent Selection Chromosome Doubling Induction Rate 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Belicuas PR, Guimarães CT, Paiva LV, Duarte JM, Maluf WR, Paiva E (2007) Androgenetic haploids and SSR markers as tools for the development of tropical maize hybrids. Euphytica 156:95–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bordes J, de Vaulx RD, Lapierre A, Pollacsek M (1997) Haplodiploidization of maize (Zea mays L.) through induced gynogenesis assisted by glossy markers and its use in breeding. Agronomie 17:291–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bordes J, Charmet G, de Vaulx RD, Pollacsek M, Beckert M, Gallais A (2006) Doubled haploid versus S1-family recurrent selection for testcross performance in a maize population. Theor Appl Genet 112:1063–1072PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bordes J, Charmet G, de Vaulx RD, Lapierre A, Pollacsek M, Beckert M, Gallais A (2007) Doubled-haploid versus single-seed descent and S1-family variation for testcross performance in a maize population. Eyphytica 154:41–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Büter B, (1997) In vitro haploid production in maize. In: Jain SM, Sopory SK, Veilleux RE (eds.) In vitro haploid production in higher plants. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, London, pp 37–71Google Scholar
  6. Chalyk ST (1994) Properties of maternal haploid maize plants and potential application to maize breeding. Euphytica 79:13–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chalyk S, Baumann A, Daniel G, Eder J (2003) Aneuploidy as a possible cause of haploid-induction in maize. Maize Genet Newsl 77:29–30Google Scholar
  8. Chase SS (1947) Techniques for isolating monoploid maize plants. J Bot 34:582Google Scholar
  9. Chase SS (1952) Monoploids in maize. In: Gowen JW (ed.) Heterosis. Iowa State College Press, Ames, IA, USA, pp 389–399Google Scholar
  10. Coe EH (1959) A line of maize with high haploid frequency. Am Nat 93:381–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coe EH, Sarkar KR (1964) The detection of haploids in maize. J Hered 55:231–233Google Scholar
  12. Cowen NM, Johnson CD, Armstrong K, Miller M, Woosley A, Pescitelli S, Skokut M, Belmar S, Petolino JF (1992) Mapping genes conditioning in vitro androgenesis in maize using RFLP analysis. Theor Appl Genet 84:720–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deimling S, Röber F, Geiger HH (1997) Methodik und Genetik der in-vivo-Haploideninduktion bei Mais. Vortr Pflanzenzüchtg 38:203–224Google Scholar
  14. Eder J, Chalyk S (2002) In vivo haploid induction in maize. Theor Appl Genet 104:703–708PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics. 4th ed. Longman Scientific & Technical Ltd. Essex, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  16. Fischer E (2004) Molekulargenetische Untersuchungen zum Vorkommen paternaler DNA-Übertragung bei der in-vivo-Haploideninduktion bei Mais (Zea mays L.). Ph.D. thesis, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  17. Gallais A, (1988) A method of line development using doubled haploids: the single doubled descent recurrent selection. Theor Appl Genet 75:330–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gayen P, Madan JK, Kumar R, Sarkar KR (1994) Chromosome doubling in haploids through colchicine. Maize Genet Newsl 68:65Google Scholar
  19. Geiger HH, Roux SR, Deimling S (1994) Herbicide resistance as a marker in screening for maternal haploids. Maize Genet Newsl 68:99Google Scholar
  20. Geiger HH, Braun MD, Gordillo GA, Koch S, Jesse J, Krützfeldt BAE (2006) Variation for female fertility among haploid maize lines. Maize Genet Newsl 80:28–29Google Scholar
  21. Gordillo GA, Geiger HH (2008a) Optimization of DH-line based recurrent selection procedures in maize under a restricted annual loss of genetic variance. Euphytica 161:141–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gordillo GA, Geiger HH (2008b) Alternative recurrent selection strategies using doubled haploid lines in hybrid maize breeding. Crop Sci 48:911–922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gordillo GA, Geiger HH (2008c) MBP (version 1.0): A software package to optimize maize breeding procedures based on doubled haploid lines. J Hered 99:227–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Greenblatt IM, Bock M (1967) A commercially desirable procedure for detection of monoploids in maize. J Hered 58:9–13Google Scholar
  25. Griffing B (1975) Efficiency changes due to use of doubled-haploids in recurrent selection methods. Theor Appl Genet 46:367–386Google Scholar
  26. Hallauer AR, Miranda JB (1981) Quantitative genetics in maize breeding. Iowa State Univ. Press, Ames, IA, USAGoogle Scholar
  27. Hosp J, de Faria Maraschin S, Touraev A, Boutilier K (2007) Functional genomics of microspore embryogenesis. Euphytica 158:275–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kasha KJ (ed.) (1974) Haploids in higher plants. University of Guelph, Canada.Google Scholar
  29. Kato A (2002) Chromosome doubling of haploid maize seedlings using nitrous oxide gas at the flower primordial stage. Plant Breed 121:370–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kermicle JL (1969) Androgenesis conditioned by a mutation in maize. Science 166:1422–1424PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kermicle JL (1994) Indeterminate gametophyte (ig) — biology and use. In: Freeling M, Walbot V (eds.) The Maize Handbook, Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Lamkey KR, Edwards JW (1999) Quantitative genetics of heterosis. In: Coors JG, Pandey S (eds.) The genetics and exploitation of heterosis in crops. ASA — CSSA, Madison, WI, pp 31–48Google Scholar
  33. Lashermes P, Beckert M (1988) A genetic control of maternal haploidy in maize (Zea mays L.) and selection of haploid inducing lines. Theor Appl Genet 76:405–410Google Scholar
  34. Longin CFH, Utz HF, Reif JC, Schipprack W, Melchinger AE (2006) Hybrid maize breeding with doubled haploids: I. One-stage versus two-stage selection for testcross performance. Theor Appl Genet 112:903–912PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Longin CFH, Utz HF, Reif JC, Wegenast T, Schipprack W, Melchinger, AE (2007) Hybrid maize breeding with doubled haploids: III. Efficiency of early testing prior to doubled haploid production in two-stage selection for testcross performance. Theor Appl Genet 115:519–527PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Melchinger AE, Geiger HH, Schnell FW (1986) Epistasis in maize (Zea mays L.) I. Comparison of single and three-way cross hybrids among early flint and dent inbred lines. Maydica 31:179–192Google Scholar
  37. Murigneux A (1994) Genotypic variation of quantitative trait loci controlling in vitro androgenesis in maize. Genome 37:970–976PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nanda DK, Chase SS (1966) An embryo marker for detecting monoploids of maize (Zea mays L.). Crop Sci 6:213–215Google Scholar
  39. Petolino JF, Thompson SA (1987) Genetic analysis of anther culture response in maize, Theor Appl Genet 74:284–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pollacsek M (1992) Management of the ig gene for haploid induction in maize. Agronomie 12:247–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Presterl T, Ouzunova M, Schmidt W, Möller EM, Röber FK, Knaak C, Ernst K, Westhoff P, Geiger HH (2007) Quantitative trait loci for early plant vigour of maize grown in chilly environments. Theor Appl Genet 114:1059–1070PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pret'ová A, Obert B, Bartošová Z (2006) Haploid formation in maize, barley, flax, and potato. Protoplasma 228:107–114PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Randolph LF (1932) Some effects of high temperature on polyploidy and other variations in maize. Genetics 18:222–229Google Scholar
  44. Röber FK (1999) Fortpflanzungsbiologische und genetische Untersuchungen mit RFLP-Markern zur in-vivo-Haploideninduktion bei Mais. Ph.D. thesis, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  45. Röber FK, Gordillo GA, Geiger HH (2005) In vivo haploid induction in maize — Performance of new inducers and significance of doubled haploid lines in hybrid breeding. Maydica 50:275–283Google Scholar
  46. Rotarenco V, Eder J (2003) Possible effects of heterofertilization on the induction of maternal haploids in maize. Maize Genet Newsl 77:30Google Scholar
  47. Rotarenco VA, Kirtoca IH, Jacota AG (2007) Possibility to identify kernels with haploid embryo by oil content. Maize Genet Newsl 81:11 (http://www.agron.missouri.edu/mnl/81/32rotarenco.htm)Google Scholar
  48. Roux SR (1995) Züchterische Untersuchungen zur in-vivo-Haploideninduktion bei Mais. Ph.D. thesis, University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  49. Sarkar KR, Pandey A, Gayen P, Mandan JK, Kumar R, Sachan JKS (1994) Stabilization of high haploid inducer lines. Maize Genet Newsl 68:64–65Google Scholar
  50. Schneerman MC, Charbonneau M, Weber DF (2000) A survey of ig containing materials. Maize Genet Newsl 74:92–93Google Scholar
  51. Seitz G (2005) The use of doubled haploids in corn breeding. In: Proc. of the 41th Annual Illinois Corn Breeders' School 2005. Urbana-Champaign, Il, USA, p. 1–7Google Scholar
  52. Shatskaya OA, Zabirova ER, Shcherbak VS, Chumak MV (1994) Mass induction of maternal haploids in corn. Maize Genet Newsl 68:51Google Scholar
  53. Spitkó T, Sági L, Pintér J, Marton LC, Barnabás B (2006) Haploid regeneration aptitude of maize(Zea mays L.) — Lines of various origin and of their hybrids. Maydica 51:537–542Google Scholar
  54. Tyrnov VS, Zavalishina AN (1984) Inducing high frequency of matroclinal haploids in maize. Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR 276(3):735–738Google Scholar
  55. Weber DF (1986) The production and utilization of monosomic Zea mays in cytogenetic studies. In: Reddy GM, Coe EH (eds.) Gene structure and function in higher plants. Oxford and IBH, New Delhi, India, pp 191–204Google Scholar
  56. Wedzony M, Röber F, Geiger HH (2002) Chromosome elimination observed in selfed progenies of maize inducer line RWS. In: VII Intern. Congress on Sexual Plant Reproduction. Maria Curie-Sklodowska University Press, Lublin, Poland, pp 173Google Scholar
  57. Zabirova ER, Shatskaya OA, Shcherbak VS (1993) Line 613/2 as a source of a high frequency of spontaneous diploidization in corn. Maize Genet Newsl 67:67Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Plant Breeding, Seed Science, and Population GeneticsUniversität HohenheimStuttgartGermany

Personalised recommendations