Advertisement

Sharing the News

Disseminating Information about Your Work and its Impact
  • Erin L. Dolan
Part of the Mentoring in Academia and Industry book series (MAI, volume 1)

A number of venues provide opportunities to get feedback from other scientists and educators about your work, share the lessons you have learned, disseminate the materials you have developed, and contribute to the body of knowledge about science teaching and learning. Only by publicizing K-12 outreach and engagement work will interested individuals be able to avoid reinventing the wheel and lay a solid foundation for a unified expansion of the profession and discipline of K-12 outreach, engagement, and partnership.

Keywords

Science Teacher Engagement Work Public Engagement National Science Teacher Association Distance Learning Program 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bush SD, Pelaez NJ, Rudd JA, Stevens MT, Williams KS, Allen DE, Tanner KD (2006) Approaches to biology teaching and learning: On hiring science faculty with education specialties for your science (not education) department. CBE Life Sci Educ 5:297–305.Google Scholar
  2. Carpenter WA (2000) Ten years of silver bullets: Dissenting thoughts on education reform. Phi Delta Kappan 81:383–389.Google Scholar
  3. Dolan EL (2007) Grappling with the literature of education research and practice. CBE Life Sci Educ 6:289–296.Google Scholar
  4. Dolan EL, Tanner KD (2005) Moving from outreach to partnership: Striving for articulation and reform across the K-20+ science education continuum. Cell Biol Educ 4:35–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fraknoi A (2005) Steps and missteps toward an emerging profession. Mercury 34:19–25.Google Scholar
  6. Lally D, Brooks E, Tax FE, Dolan EL (2007) Sowing the seeds of dialogue: Public engagement through plant science. Plant Cell 19:2311–2319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Leshner AI (2007) Outreach training needed. Science 315:161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2006) OpenCourseWare marks 5 years. TechTalk 50 (22). http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2006/ocw.html. Accessed 28 November 2007.
  9. Mervis J (2007) Public science: Pilot NSF program flies into stiff community headwinds. Science 318:1365–1367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. MA Miller (2006) Assessing college-level learning. Natl Cen Public Pol Higher Educ PolicyAlert, May issue. http://www.highereducation.org/reports/pa_aclearning/nam.shtml. Accessed 26 November 2007.
  11. Talanquer V, Novodvorsky I, Slater TF, Tomanek D (2003) A stronger role for science departments in the preparation of future chemistry teachers. J Chem Educ 80:1168–1171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Tanner KD, Allen D (2006) Approaches to biology teaching and learning: On integrating pedagogical training into the graduate experiences of future science faculty. CBE Life Sci Educ 5:1–6.Google Scholar
  13. Tanner KD, Chatman L, Allen D (2003) Approaches to biology teaching and learning: Science teaching and learning across the school–university divide: Cultivating conversations through scientist–teacher partnerships. Cell Biol Educ 2:195–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Tomanek D, Talanquer V, Novodvorksy I, Slater TF (2003) Responding to the call for change: The new college of science teacher preparation program at the University of Arizona. Cell Biol Educ 2:29–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Zmuda A, Kuklis R, Kline E (2004) Transforming schools: Creating a culture of continuous improvement. Assoc Superv Curric Develop, Alexandria VA .Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erin L. Dolan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biochemistry Fralin Center Virginia TechBlacksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations