How Well?

Evaluating K-12 Outreach and Engagement
  • Erin L. Dolan
Part of the Mentoring in Academia and Industry book series (MAI, volume 1)

Regardless of the path of activities you choose to pursue in K-12 outreach and engagement, evaluation will help you know when it “works” and help you learn when it doesn’t. In this chapter, evaluation is defined and distinguished from research and assessment. Ways to approach evaluation are described, including the use of qualita tive and quantitative methods and consideration of evaluation findings in formative and summative ways. Also included are a variety of resources useful for guiding the design and implementation of evaluation plans.


Science Education Education Research Evaluation Plan Evaluation Question External Evaluator 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Anfara Jr VA, Brown KM, Mangione TL (2002) Qualitative analysis on stage: Making theresearch process more public. Educ Res 31:28–38.Google Scholar
  2. Creswell JW (2003) Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches(2nd ed). Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks CA.Google Scholar
  3. Dolan EL (2007) Grappling with the literature of education research and practice. CBE Life SciEduc 6:289–296.Google Scholar
  4. Drislane R, Parkinson G (2007) Online dictionary of the social sciences. Athabasca University. Accessed 28 August 2007.
  5. Ercikan K, Roth WM (2006) What good is polarizing research into qualitative and quantitative? Educ Res 35:14–23.Google Scholar
  6. Felix DA, Hertle MD, Conley JG, Washington LB, Bruns PJ (2004) Assessing precollege science education outreach initiatives: A funder's perspective. Cell Biol Educ 3:189–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Feuer M, Towne L, Shavelson R (2002) Scientific culture and educational research. Educ Res 31:4–14.Google Scholar
  8. Frechtling J (2002) The 2002 user friendly handbook for project evaluation. National Science Foundation, Arlington VA . Accessed 25 April 2007.
  9. Guba EG, Lincoln YS (1989) Fourth generation evaluation. Sage Publications, Newbury Park CA. Google Scholar
  10. Hertle MD, Moreno N (2004) Peer evaluation cluster: Perspectives of a program officer and a grantee participant. Ann Meet Natl Inst Health Natl Cent Res Resour Sci Educ Partnership Award, February 26–29, St. Louis, MO. Accessed 12 April 2007.
  11. Joint Committee for Standards of Educational Evaluation (1994) The program evaluation standards: How to assess evaluations of educational programs. Sage Publications,Thousand Oaks CA.Google Scholar
  12. Kearsley G (copyright 1994–2007). Explorations in learning & instruction: The theory into practice database. . Accessed 16 June 2007.
  13. Mosteller F, Nave B, Miech E (2004) Why we need a structured abstract in education research. Educ Res 33:29–34.Google Scholar
  14. Patton MQ (2002) Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed). Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks CA.Google Scholar
  15. Shavelson RJ, Towne L (Eds) (2002) Scientific research in education. National Academy Press, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  16. Stufflebeam DL (2001) Evaluation models. New Dir Eval 89:7–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sundberg MD (2002) Assessing student learning. Cell Biol Educ 1:11–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. York P (2005) A funder's guide to evaluation: Leveraging evaluation to improve nonprofit effectiveness. Fieldstone Alliance, St. Paul MN.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erin L. Dolan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biochemistry Fralin Center Virginia TechBlacksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations