Who and What?

Defining the Scope of K-12 Outreach and Engagement
  • Erin L. Dolan
Part of the Mentoring in Academia and Industry book series (MAI, volume 1)

Outreach to whom, where, and how? The answers to these questions are shaped initially by one's interests, experience, and expertise. Once the options are narrowed, the particular individuals, venue, and activities involved will further delineate one's K-12 outreach and engagement efforts.


Stem Cell Research National Science Education Standard Embryonic Stem Cell Research High School Biology Baccalaureate Degree 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Abell SK, Roth M (1991) Coping with constraints of teaching elementary science: A case study of a science enthusiast student teacher. Natl Assoc Res Sci Teach Ann Conf (Lake Geneva, WI, April 7-10, 1991).Google Scholar
  2. American Association for the Advancement of Science (1989) Project 2061: Science for all Americans. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  3. American Association for the Advancement of Science (2001) Project 2061: Atlas of science literacy. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Bell RL, Blair LM, Crawford BA, Lederman NG (2003) Just do it? Impact of a science apprenticeship program on high school students’ understandings of the nature of science and scientific inquiry. J Res Sci Teach 40:487–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bybee R, Morrow C (1998) Improving science education: The role of scientists. Newsl Forum Educ Amer Phys Soc. Accessed 3 December 2007
  6. Darling-Hammond L, Hudson L (1990) Precollege science and mathematics teachers: Supply, demand, and quality. Rev Res Educ 16:223–264.Google Scholar
  7. Field H, Powell P (2001) Public understanding of science versus public understanding of research. Public Understand Sci 10:421–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Freedman MP (1997) Relationship among laboratory instruction, attitude toward science, and achievement in science knowledge. J Res Sci Teach 34:343–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Garet MS, Porter AC, Desimone L, Birman BF, Yoon KS (2001) What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. Amer Educ Res J 38:915–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goldhaber DD, Brewer DJ (1997) Why don’t schools and teachers seem to matter? Assessing the impact of unobservables on education. J Hum Resour 32:505–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Greenfield TA (1996) Gender, ethnicity, science achievement, and attitudes. J Res Sci Teach 33:901–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gruber KJ, Wiley SD, Broughman SP, Strizek GA, Burian-Fitzgerald M (2002) Schools and Staffing Survey, 1999–2000: Overview of the Data for Public, Private, Public Charter, and Bureau of Indian Affairs Elementary and Secondary Schools, NCES 2002–313, U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  13. Hart C, Mulhall P, Berry A, Loughran J, Gunstone R (2000) What is the purpose of this experiment? Or can students learn something from doing experiments? J Res in Sci Teach 37:655–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hershey DR (2002) Plant blindness: We have met the enemy and he is us. Plant Sci Bull 48:78–84.—3.html#Plant. Accessed 11 May 2007.Google Scholar
  15. Hershey DR (2005) Plant content in the national science education standards. Accessed 23 May 2007. Hodson D (1996) Laboratory work as scientific method: Three decades of confusion and distortion. J Curric Stud 28:115–135.Google Scholar
  16. Hodson D (1998) Science fiction: The continuing misrepresentation of science in the school curriculum. Curric Stud 6:191–216.Google Scholar
  17. Hodson D, Bencze L (1998) Becoming critical about practical work: changing views and changing practice through action research. Int J Sci Educ 20:683–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hofstein A, Lunetta VN (2004) The laboratory in science education: Foundations for the twenty-first century. Sci Educ 88:28–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ingersoll R (1999) The problem of underqualified teachers in American secondary schools. Educ Res 28:26–37.Google Scholar
  20. Jovanovic J, King SS (1998) Boys and girls in the performance-based science classroom: Who's doing the performing? Amer Educ Res J 35:477–496.Google Scholar
  21. Kua E, Reder M, Grossel M (2004) Science in the news: A study of reporting genomics. PublicUnderstand Sci 13:309–22.Google Scholar
  22. Laursen SL (2006) Getting unstuck: Strategies for escaping the science standards straightjacket. Astron Educ Rev 5:162–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Manning P, Esler W, Baird J (1982) What research says: How much elementary science is really being taught? Sci Child 19:40–41.Google Scholar
  24. Monk DH (1994) Subject area preparation of secondary mathematics and science teachers and student achievement. Econ Educ Rev 13:125–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. National Center for Education Statistics (2005) Digest of education statistics. US Dept Educ, Washington DC. Accessed 7 June 2007.Google Scholar
  26. National Research Council (1996) National science education standards. National Academy Press, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  27. National Research Council (2006) America's lab report: Investigations in high school science. In: Committee on High School Science Laboratories: Role and Vision, Singer SR, Hilton ML, Schweingruber HA (Eds.) Board on Science Education, Center for Education. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Academies Press, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  28. Reid DJ, Hodson D (1987) Science for all: Teaching science in the secondary school. Cassell, London.Google Scholar
  29. Roey S, Caldwell N, Rust K, Blumstein E, Krenzke T, Legum S, Kuhn J, Waksberg M, Haynes J (2001) The 1998 High School Transcript Study Tabulations: Comparative Data on Credits Earned and Demographics for 1998, 1994, 1990, 1987, and 1982 High School Graduates, NCES 2001–498 [Brown, J., Project Officer]. US Dept Educ, Natl Cent Educ Stat, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  30. Seastrom MM, Gruber KJ, Henke R, McGrath DJ, Cohen BA (2004) Qualifications of the public school teacher workforce: Prevalence of out-of-field teaching, 1987–88 to 1999–2000, NCES 2002–603 Revised. US Dept Educ, Natl Cent Educ Stat, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  31. Schwartz RS, Lederman NG, Crawford BA (2004) Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry. Sci Educ 88:610–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shields PM, Marsh JA, Adelman NE (1998) Evaluation of NSF's Statewide Systemic Initiatives (SSI) Program: The SSIs' impacts on classroom practice. SRI, Menlo Park CA.Google Scholar
  33. Simpson RD, Oliver JS (1990) A summary of major influences on attitude toward and achievement in science among adolescent students. Sci Educ 66:1–18.Google Scholar
  34. Stevens C, Wenner G (1996) Elementary preservice teachers’ knowledge and beliefs regarding science and mathematics. School Sci Math 96:2–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wandersee JH, Schussler EE (2001) Toward a theory of plant blindness. Plant Sci Bull 47:2–9.Google Scholar
  36. Weiss IR, Montgomery DL, Ridgway CJ, Bond SL (1998) Local systemic change through teacher enhancement: Year three cross-site report. Horizon Research, Inc., Chapel Hill, NC.Google Scholar
  37. Virginia Department of Education (2001) Science standards of learning. Commonwealth of Virginia, Richmond VA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erin L. Dolan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Biochemistry Fralin Center Virginia TechBlacksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations