Abstract
We present a bidder aid tool that allows bidders to more effectively participate in combinatorial FCC spectrum auctions by enabling concise expression of preferences. In addition to logical relationships between items, bidders may express spectrum-specific preferences such as those related to minimum population coverage, bandwidth, and budget. The tool can be used to simultaneously generate and evaluate a set of most profitable biddable packages, both at the start of the auction and dynamically before each round. We also explore the effect of creating “best-fit” packages at each round. Our preliminary results show that the use of this tool may significantly simplify bidders’ efforts in generating packages of interest and lead to efficient auction outcomes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
An, N. Elmaghraby, W. and Keskinocak,P, Bidding Strategies and their Impact on Revenues in Combinatorial Auctions, Journal of Revenue & Pricing Management 3, 337–357 (2005).
Ausubel, L, E-mail communication (2002).
Ausubel, L.M., and Cramton, P., Demand Reduction and Inefficiency in Multi-Unit Auctions, Working paper, Department of Economics, University of Maryland. (1998).
Ausubel, L.M. and Cramton, P., Auctioning Many Divisible Goods Journal of the European Economic Association, 2, 480-493 (2004).
Ausubel, L.M. and Milgrom, P. Ascending Auctions with Package Bidding, Frontiers of Theoretical Economics, 1, 1-45 (2002).
Banks, J.S., Ledyard, J.O., and Porter, D., Allocating Uncertain and Unresponsive Resources: An Experimental Approach, The Rand Journal of Economics, 20(1), 1- 25 (1989).
Boutilier, C., Solving Concisely Expressed Combinatorial Auction Problems, Proceedings of the 18 th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-02), pp. 359-366 (2002).
Boutilier, C., and Hoos, H.,H., Bidding Languages for Combinatorial Auctions, Proceedings of the 7th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1211-1217, (2001).
Bykowsky, M.M., Cull, R.J., and Ledyard, J.O., Mutually Destructive Bidding: The FCC Auction Design Problem, Journal of Regulatory Economics, 17(3), 205-228 (2000).
Conen, W., and Sandholm, T, Minimal Preference Elicitation in Combinatorial Auctions, Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Workshop on Economic Agents, Models, and Mechanisms, 71-80, (2001).
Cramton, P., Money Out of Thin Air: The Nationwide Narrowband PCS Auction, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 4, 267-343 (1995).
Cramton, P., The FCC Spectrum Auctions: An Early Assessment, Journal of Economics and Management Strategy,.6(3), 431-495, (1997).
Cramton, P., Interview at the University of Maryland, 2002a.
Cramton, P., Spectrum Auctions, in Handbook of Telecommunications Economics, Cave. M., Majumdar, S., and Vogelsang, I., Eds., Amsterdam: Elsevier Science B.V., Chapter 14, 605-639 (2002b).
Cramton, P., E-mail communication, 2003.
Cramton, P., Shoham, Y., and Steinberg, R., Introduction to Combinatorial Auctions, in Combinatorial Auctions, edited by Peter Cramton, Yoav Shoham, and Richard Steinberg , MIT Press (2005).
Csirik, J.A., Littman, M.L., Singh, S., and Stone, P., FAucS: An FCC Spectrum Auction Simulator for Autonomous Bidding Agents, In Electronic Commerce: Proceedings of the Second International Workshopedited by Fiege, L., Mühl, G., and Wilhelm, U, 139-151, Springer Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, (2001).
DeMartini, C., Kwasnica, A.M., Ledyard, J.O., and Porter, D., A New and Improved Design for Multi-Object Iterative Auctions, Technical report, California Institute of Technology, (1998).
Dunford, M., Hoffman, K., Menon, D., Sultana, R., and Wilson, T., Testing Linear Pricing Algorithms for use in Ascending Combinatorial Auctions, working paper, George Mason University, Department of Systems Engineering and Operations Research, (2004).
FCC Public Notice, DA 03-1994, Auction of Regional Narrowband PCS Licenses Scheduled for September 24, 2003; Notice and Filing Requirements, Minimum Opening Bids, Upfront Payments, Package Bidding and Other Auction Procedures,”http://wireless.fcc.gov/auctions/default.htm?job=release&id=53&y=2 003, (2003).
Goeree, J.K., and Holt, C.A., Comparing the FCC’s Combinatorial and Non-Combinatorial Simultaneous Multiple Round Auctions: Experimental Design Report, http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-05-1267A2.pdf, (2005).
Günlük, O., Ladànyi, L., and De Vries, S., A Branch-and-Price Algorithm and New Test Problems for Spectrum Auctions, Management Science 51(3) 391-406 (2005)
Hudson, B., and Sandholm, T. Effectiveness of Preference Elicitation in Combinatorial Auctions, AAMAS-02 Workshop on Agent-Mediated Electronic Commerce (AMEC), Italy, (2002).
Jones, J.L., and Koehler, G.J., Combinatorial Auctions using Rule-based Bids, Decision Support Systems, Vol. 34(1), pp. 59-74, (2002).
Kwon, R.H., Anandalingam, G., and Ungar, L.H., Iterative Combinatorial Auctions with Bidder-Determined Combinations,” Management Science, 51(3), 407-418, (2005).
Leyton-Brown, K., Pearson, M., and Shoham, Y., Towards a Universal Test Suite for Combinatorial Auction Algorithms, Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC-00),66-76, (2000).
McMillan, J., Selling Spectrum Rights, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 8, pp. 145-162, (1994).
Nisan, N., Bidding and Allocation in Combinatorial Auctions, presented at the ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, (2000).
Parkes, D.C., iBundle: An Efficient Ascending Price Bundle Auction, Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC-99), (1999).
Parkes, D.C., Cavallo, R., Elprin, N., Juda, A., Lahaie, S., Lubin, B., Michael, L., Shneidman, J., and Sultan, H., “ICE” An Iterative Combinatorial Exchange, Proceedings of the 6 th ACM conference on Electronic Commerce, 249 – 258, (2005).
Parkes, D.C., and Ungar, L. H., Preventing Strategic Manipulation in Iterative Auctions: Proxy Agents and Price-Adjustment, Proceedings of the 17th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-00), 82-89, (2000).
Porter, D., Rassenti, S., and Smith, V., Combinatorial Auction Design, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(19) 11153-11157, (2003).
Reitsma, P.S.A., Stone, P., Csirik, J.A., and Littman, M.L., Self-enforcing Strategic Demand Reduction, Agent Mediated Electronic Commerce IV: Designing Mechanisms and Systems, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 289–306, Springer Verlag, (2002).
Rothkopf, M.H., Pekec, A., and Harstad, R.M., Computationally Manageable Combinational Auctions, Management Science, 44(8), 1131-1147, (1998).
Tarnutzer, B., Interview at the Federal Communications Commission, 2002.
Wilkie, S., Interview at the Federal Communications Commission, 2002.
Wurman, P.R., and Wellman, M.P., AkBA: A Progressive, Anonymous-Price Combinatorial Auction, In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (ACM-EC), 21- 29, (2000).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hoffman, K., Menon, D., Heever, S.A.v. (2008). A Package Bidding Tool for the Fcc’S Spectrum Auctions, and its Effect on Auction Outcomes. In: Raghavan, S., Golden, B., Wasil, E. (eds) Telecommunications Modeling, Policy, and Technology. Operations Research/Computer Science Interfaces, vol 44. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77780-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77780-1_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-77779-5
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-77780-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)