Legislative meta-data based on semantic formal models

  • V. Bartalesi Lenzi
  • C. Biagioli
  • A. Cappelli
  • R. Sprugnoli
  • F. Turchi

The Law Making Environment system for planning, wording and managing legislative sources is made up of editing and search supporting tools.

In order to handle the semantics of legislative sources, two interacting models have been developed: a rule model and a lexicon of concepts. Semantic draft and search supporting tools are based on both models, in a way that makes their interaction possible. A rule theory has been developed, which can describe the illocutionary profile of legislative texts through meta data. As far as concepts are concerned, a conceptual dictionary has been also created.

Through the search tool the user is enabled to query for instances of obligations related to particular actions or subjects, described in the query through the domain ontology. The metaSearch tool shows the related rules and additionally, if requested, finds implicit information, providing the user with a wide account on the subject and playing to some extent the role of an advice system.


Domain Ontology Legal Entity Legal Text Ontological Class Core Ontology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Biagioli, C.: Towards a legal rules functional micro-ontology. In: Proceedings of LEGONT'97. Melbourne (1997) Available via Scholar
  2. 2.
    Biagioli, C., Grossi, D.: Towards a Formal Foundation of Meta Drafting. (To appear 2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Breuker, J., Hoekstra, R.: Epistemology and ontology in core ontologies: FOLaw and LRI- Core, two core ontologies for law. In: Proceedings of EKAW Workshop on Core ontologies. Northamptonshire (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Breuker, J., Hoekstra, R., Boer, A., van den Berg, K., Rubino, R., Sartor, G., Palmi-rani, M., Wyner, A., Bench-Capon, T.: OWL ontology of basic legal concepts (LKIF- Core). Deliverable 1.4, Estrella (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Corcho, O., Fernndez-Lpez, M., Gmez-Prez, A.: Methodologies, tools and languages for building ontologies. Where is their meeting point? Data& Knowledge Engineering 46(1) 41–64 (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gangemi, A., Sagri, M., Tiscornia, D.: Constructive framework for legal ontologies. In: Law and the Semantic Web. Springer Verlag (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hirst, G.: Ontology and the lexicon. In: Handbook on Ontologies in Information Systems. Springer Verlag, (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rawls J.: Two Concepts of Rule. Philosophical Review 64 3–32 (1955)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CELCTPovoItaly
  2. 2.ITTIG-CNRFirenzeItaly

Personalised recommendations