Exploring aspects of scientific publishing in astrophysics and cosmology: the views of scientists

  • Panayiota Polydoratou
  • Martin Moyle

Scientists in astrophysics and cosmology make much use of the arXiv repository. Concerns raised by scientists in those fields about publication costs and delays, and the transparency and validity of the peer review process, raised questions about levels of satisfaction with existing publishing models. This paper discusses the results from a community survey in the fields of astrophysics and cosmology, conducted as part of an investigation into the feasibility of an “ overlay journal ” model in these disciplines. Six hundred and eighty three (683) researchers provided information about their academic/research background, their research practices, and their attitudes, both as producers and consumers of information, to the traditional journal publishing system, and gave their reaction to the overlay publication model. The survey results indicate that scientists in these disciplines are, in general, favourably disposed towards new publishing models, although some important caveats and concerns, particularly regarding quality, were highlighted.


Editorial Board Peer Review Process Open Access Journal Publishing Model Overlay Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ginsparg, P. (1996). Winners and Losers in the Global Research Village. Invited contribution, UNESCO Conference HQ, Paris, 19–23 Feb 1996. Available at: (Last accessed 20/01/2008)
  2. Haggemann, M. (2006). SPARC Innovator: December 2006. Available at: (Last accessed 20/0/1/2008)
  3. Halliday, L and C Oppenheim. (1999). Economic models of the Digital Library. Available at: (Last accessed 20/01/2008)
  4. Prosser, David C. (2005) Fulfilling the promise of scholarly communication — a comparison between old and new access models, in Nielsen, Erland Kolding and Saur, Klaus G. and Ceynowa, Klaus, Eds. Die innovative Bibliothek : Elmar Mittler zum 65.Geburtstag, pp. 95– 106. K G Saur. (Also available at (Last accessed 20/01/2008)
  5. Smith, J W T. (1999). The deconstructed journal: a new model for academic publishing. Learned Publishing, Vol. 12 (2), pp. 79–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. The Times Higher Education Supplement. (2006). World ' s top 100 in science. Available at: (Last accessed 31/08/2007)
  7. The Times Higher Education Supplement. (2006). World ' s top non university institutions in science. Available at: (Last accessed 31/08/2007)

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Panayiota Polydoratou
  • Martin Moyle

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations