International Patterns in Manufacturing Strategies

  • Ruth Alas
  • Tomas Eklund
  • Mikael Collan
  • Ants Kraus


This chapter explores and analyses patterns in international manufacturing strategies, based on data from the Fourth International Manufacturing Strategy Survey (IMSS), conducted in 2005. Based on a principal components analysis a selection of the thirty-one most important contributing variables from the IMSS dataset is made, and a self-organizing map (SOM) is used to cluster manufacturing companies according to their strategy, performance, manufacturing and supply-chain practices, and improvement programs. The clusters of companies and patterns of strategies are analyzed and discussed. Special attention is attached to differences between countries. The results reveal four groups (types) of companies: low supply-chain integration companies; integrated supply-chain companies; mass production, high tech companies; and production-oriented low tech companies.


Supply Chain Product Life Cycle Business Unit Enterprise Resource Planning Enterprise Resource Planning System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support of the Academy of Finland (Domino, grant no. 104639).


  1. Back B, Oosterom G, Sere K, van Wezel M. (1995) Intelligent information systems within business: bankruptcy predictions using neural networks. In: Doukidis G, Galliers R, Jelassi T, Krcmar H, Land F (eds) Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Information Systems ECIS '95, Athens, Greece, June 1-3, 1995:99-112Google Scholar
  2. Back B, Sere K, Vanharanta H (1998) Managing complexity in large data bases using self-organizing maps. Account Manag Inform Tech 8:191-210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Charalambous C, Hadjinicola GC, Muller E (2001) Product positioning using principles from the self-organizing map. Lecture Notes In Computer Science, Vol. 2130: Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Neural Networks, Vienna, Austria. Springer-Verlag , London:457-463Google Scholar
  4. Chen D-R, Chang R-F, Huang Y-L (2000) Breast Cancer Diagnosis Using Self-Organizing Map for Sonography. Ultrasound Med Biol 26(3):405-411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Costea A, Kloptchenko A, Back B (2004) Analyzing Economical Performance of Central-East-European Countries Using Neural Networks and Cluster Analysis. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Economic Informatics, May, Bucharest, Rumania. Editura Inforec, Bucharest:1006-1011Google Scholar
  6. Eklund T, Back B, Vanharanta H, Visa A (2003). Using the self-organizing map as a visualization tool in financial benchmarking. Inform Visual 2(3):171-181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Frolich MT (2002) Techniques for improving response rate in OM surveys. J Oper Manag 20:53-62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kasabov N, Deng D, Erzegovezi L, Fedrizzi M, Beber A (2000). Hybrid Intelligent Decision Support Systems for Risk Analysis and Prediction of Evolving Economic Clusters in Europe. In: Kasabov N (ed) Future Directions for Intelligent Information Systems and Information Sciences. Springer Verlag, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  9. Kaski S, Kohonen T (1996) Exploratory Data Analysis by the Self-Organizing Map: Structures of Welfare and Poverty in the World. In: Neural Networks in Financial Engineering: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Neural Networks in the Capital Markets, London, England October 1995. World Scientific, Singapore:498-507Google Scholar
  10. Kiang MY, Hu MY, Fischer DM (2006). An extended self-organizing map network for market segmentation—a telecommunication example. Decis Support Syst 42(1):36-47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kiviluoto K (1998) Predicting bankruptcies with the self-organizing map. Neurocomputing 21(1-3):191-201zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kohonen T (2001) Self-Organizing Maps. Springer-Verlag, BerlinzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kohonen T, Kaski S, Lagus K, Salojarvi J, Honkela J, Paatero V Saarela A (2000) Self organization of a massive document collection. IEEE Trans Neural Network 11(3):574-585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lindberg P, Voss CA, Blackmon KL (1998) International manufacturing strategies: Context, content and change. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  15. Länsiluoto A, Eklund T, Back B, Vanharanta H, Visa A (2004) Industry Specific Cycles and Companies' Financial Performance - Comparison with Self-Organizing Maps. Benchmark Int J 11(4):267-286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Malhotra MK, Grover V (1998) An assessment of survey research in POM: from constructs to theory. J Oper Manag 16:407-425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Martin-del-Brio B, Serrano-Cinca C (1993) Self-organizing Neural Networks for the Analysis and Representation of Data: Some Financial Cases. Neural Comput Appl 1(2):193-206Google Scholar
  18. Moattar-Husseini SM, Brien CO (2004) Strategic impications of manufacturing performance comparisons for newly industrialising countries. Int J Oper Prod Manag 24(11/12):1126-1148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Oja M, Kaski S, Kohonen T (2003) Bibliography of Self-Organizing Map (SOM) Papers: 1998-2001 Addendum. Neural Comput Surv 3:1-156Google Scholar
  20. Rungtusanatham MJ, Choi TY, Hollingworth DG, Wu Z, Forza C (2003) Survey research in operations management: historical analyses. J Oper Manag 21:475-488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Vesanto J, Alhoniemi E (2000) Clustering of the Self-Organizing Map. IEEE Trans Neural Network 11(3):586-600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Visa A, Toivonen J, Bacb B, Vanharanta H (2000) Toward Text Understanding - Classification of Text Documents by Word Map. In: Dasarathy BV (ed) Proceedings of SPIE, Volume 4057, Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery: Theory, Tools, and Technology II:299–305Google Scholar
  23. Yen RH, Sheu C (2004) Aligning ERP implementation with competitive priorities of manufacturing firms: An exploratory study. Int J Prod Econ 92(3):207-220CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ruth Alas
    • 1
  • Tomas Eklund
    • 2
  • Mikael Collan
    • 3
  • Ants Kraus
    • 3
  1. 1.Estonian Business SchoolEstonia
  2. 2.Institute for Advanced Management Systems ResearchÅbo Akademi UniversityFinland
  3. 3.Estonian Business SchoolEstonia

Personalised recommendations