Skip to main content

The Role of China in Requirements Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The China Information Technology Handbook
  • 924 Accesses

Abstract

China was the first country to create gunpowder, the seismograph, the magnetic compass, steel, paper, and the suspension bridge. Yet in the twentieth century, China seemed to take a back seat to the West regarding the invention and exploitations of information technology (IT). This paper shows how China’s role in one area within IT, namely requirements engineering (RE), is dramatically increasing in the past 15 years, and in fact, China has become one of the world’s leaders in this area of research. This paper carefully examines the demographics of the entire corpus of RE publications and shows the roles played by authors from China. It discovers that although the demographics of RE research in Asia are very similar to the rest of the world, wide differences exist between individual Asian nations. Specifically, China’s rate of growth in RE publication production far exceeds any other Asian country.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Davis A (2005) Just enough requirements management. Dorset House, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • The Standish Group (1990) The Chaos Report. www.standishgroup.com

  • Davis A, Hickey A, Dieste O, Juristo N, Moreno A (2007) A quantitative assessment of requirements engineering publications – 1963-2006. In: Proc working conference on requirements engineering: foundation for software quality. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Athey S, Plotnicki J (2000) An evaluation of research productivity in academic IT. Comm AIS 3: 1-20

    Google Scholar 

  • Grover V, Segars A, Simon A (1999) An assessment of institutional research productivity in MIS. Database 23: 25-29

    Google Scholar 

  • Im K, Kim K, Kim J (1996) An assessment of individual and institutional research productivity in MIS. Decision Line 31: 8-12

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang HH, Hsu J (2005) An evaluation of publication productivity in information systems: 1999 to 2003. Comm AIS 15: 555-564

    Google Scholar 

  • Farhoomand A, Drury D (1999) A historiographical examination of information systems. Comm AIS 1:Article 19

    Google Scholar 

  • Lending D, Wetherbe J (1992) Update on MIS research: A profile of leading journals and U.S. universities. Database, 23: 5-11

    Google Scholar 

  • Vessey I, Ramesh V, Glass R (2002) Research in information systems: An empirical study of diversity in the discipline and its journals. JMIS 19: 129-174

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel D, Wetherbe J (1984) MIS research: A profile of leading journals and universities. DataBase 16: 3-14

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass R, Vessey I, Ramesh V (2002) Research in software engineering: An analysis of the literature. Information Software Technology 44: 491-506

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass R, Chen T (2005) An assessment of systems and software engineering scholars and institutions (1999-2003). J Systems Software 76: 91-97

    Google Scholar 

  • Gervasi V, Kamsties E, Regnell B, Ben Achour-Salinesi C (2004) Ten years of REFSQ: A quantitative analysis. In: Proc 10th international workshop on requirements engineering: foundation for software quality (REFSQ ’04)

    Google Scholar 

  • King W, He J (2005) Understanding the role and methods of meta-analysis in IS research. Comm AIS 16: 665-686

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis A (1990) Software requirements: analysis and specification. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis A (1993) Software requirements: objects, functions and states. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • http://web.uccs.edu/adavis/reqbib.Accessed 25 March 2007

  • Belew B (2006) China will overtake Japan in R&D spending. www.PanAsianBiz.com. Accessed 4 Dec 2006

  • China Daily (2006) China overtaking Japan in R&D spending. www.chinadaily.com. Accessed 5 Dec 2006

  • Yang F (2006) Development of software engineering: Co-operative efforts from academia, government and industry, keynote address. In: Proc 28th IEEE international conference on software engineering. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Potts C (1993) Software engineering research revisited. IEEE Software 10: 19-28

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the contributions made by Oscar Dieste, Natalia Juristo and Ana Moreno. Al Davis acknowledges partial sponsorship by the Spanish Ministry of Education Grant SAB2005-0041.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Davis, A.M., Hickey, A.M. (2009). The Role of China in Requirements Research. In: Ordóñez de Pablos, P., Lytras, M. (eds) The China Information Technology Handbook. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77743-6_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77743-6_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-77742-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-77743-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics