Advertisement

How and Why Twelve-Step Self-Help Groups Are Effective

  • Rudolf H. Moos
Chapter
Part of the Recent Developments in Alcoholism book series (RDIA, volume 18)

Self-help and mutual support groups are a key component of the system of informal care for individuals with substance use and psychiatric disorders. In fact, almost 80% of adults who seek help for alcohol dependence participate in Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) (Dawson, Grant, Stinson, & Chou, 2006); such participation appears to improve the likelihood of achieving and maintaining remission and reduce the need for further professional care. Moreover, many providers of substance use disorder (SUD) services have adopted twelve-step techniques in treatment, and most of them refer patients to self-help groups (SHGs) (Magura, 2007).

Accordingly, more information is needed about the association between participation in twelve-step SHGs and SUD outcomes and the active ingredients or social processes that may account for the effects of twelve-step SHGs. These issues are addressed here by reviewing some evidence for the effectiveness of twelve-step SHGs, describing four theories that specify social...

Keywords

Active Ingredient Coping Skill Substance Misuse Avoidance Coping Alcoholic Anonymous 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Bickel, W. K., & Vuchinich, R. E. (Eds.). (2000). Reframing health behavior change with behavior economics. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  2. Bogenschutz, M. P., Tonigan, J. S., & Miller, W. R. (2006). Examining the effects of alcoholism typology and A.A. attendance on self-efficacy as a mechanism of change. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 67, 562–567.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bond, J., Kaskutas, L. A., & Weisner, C. (2003). The persistent influence of social networks and Alcoholics Anonymous on abstinence. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 64, 579–588.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Carrico, A. W., Gifford, E. V., & Moos, R. (2007). Spirituality/religiosity promotes acceptance-based responding and twelve-step involvement. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 89, 66–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chung, T., Langenbucher, J., Labouvie, E., Pandina, R., & Moos, R. (2001). Changes in alcoholic patients’ coping responses predict l2-month treatment outcomes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69, 92–100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cloud, R. N., Ziegler, C. H., & Blondell, R. D. (2004). What is Alcoholics Anonymous affiliation? Substance Use and Misuse, 39, 1117–1136.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Connors, G. J., Tonigan, J. S., & Miller, W. R. (2001). A longitudinal model of intake symptomatology, A.A. participation, and outcome: Retrospective study of the project MATCH outpatient and aftercare samples. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 62, 817–825.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Crape, B. L., Latkin, C. A., Laris, A. S., & Knowlton, A. R. (2002). The effects of sponsorship in 12-step treatment of injection drug users. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 65, 291–301.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dawson, D. A., Grant, B. F., Stinson, F. S., & Chou, P. S. (2006). Estimating the effect of help-seeking on achieving recovery from alcohol dependence. Addiction, 101, 824–834.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Etheridge, R. M., Craddock, S. G., Hubbard, R. L., & Rounds-Bryant, J. L. (1999). The relationship of counseling and self-help participation to patient outcomes in DATOS. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 57, 99–112.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Finney, J. W., Noyes, C., Coutts, A., & Moos, R., (1998). Evaluating substance abuse treatment process models: I. Changes on proximal outcome variables during 12-step and cognitive behavioral treatment. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 59, 371–380.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Finney, J., Wilbourne, P., & Moos, R. (2007). Psychosocial treatments for substance use disorders. In P. E. Nathan, & J. M. Gorman (Eds.), A guide to treatments that work (3rd ed., pp. 179–202). New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
  13. Fiorentine, R. (1999). After drug treatment: Are 12-step programs effective in maintaining abstinence? American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 25, 93–116.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fiorentine, R., & Hillhouse, M. P. (2000a). Drug treatment and 12-step program participation: The additive effects of integrated recovery activities. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 18, 65–74.Google Scholar
  15. Fiorentine, R., & Hillhouse, M. P. (2000b). Exploring the additive effects of drug misuse treatment and Twelve-Step involvement: Does Twelve-Step ideology matter? Substance Use & Misuse, 35, 367–397.Google Scholar
  16. Granfield, R., & Cloud, W. (1996). The elephant that no one sees: Natural recovery among middle-class addicts. Journal of Drug Issues, 26, 45–61.Google Scholar
  17. Hirschi, T., 1969. Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  18. Humphreys, K., Finney, J. W., & Moos, R. (1994). Applying a stress and coping perspective to research on mutual help organizations. Journal of Community Psychology, 22, 312–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Humphreys, K., Huebsch, P., Finney, J., & Moos, R. (1999). A comparative evaluation of substance abuse treatment: V. Substance abuse treatment can enhance the effectiveness of self-help groups. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 23, 558–563.Google Scholar
  20. Humphreys, K., Mankowski, E., Moos, R. & Finney, J. (1999). Enhanced friendship networks and active coping mediate the effect of self-help groups on substance abuse. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 21, 54–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Humphreys, K., & Noke, J. M. (1997). The influence of posttreatment mutual help group participation on the friendship networks of substance abuse patients. American Journal of Community Psychology, 25, 1–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kaplan, H. B. (1996). Psychosocial stress from the perspective of self theory. In H. Kaplan (Ed.), Psychosocial stress: Perspectives on structure, theory, life course and methods (pp. 175–244). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  23. Kaskutas, L. A. (1994). What do women get out of self-help? Their reasons for attending Women for Sobriety and Alcoholics Anonymous. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 11, 185–195.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kaskutas, L. A., Ammon, L., Delucchi, K., Room, R., Bond, J., & Weisner, C. (2005). Alcoholics Anonymous careers: Patterns of A.A. involvement five years after treatment entry. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 29, 1983–1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kelly, J., McKellar, J. D., & Moos, R. (2003). Major depression in patients with substance use disorders: Relationships to 12-step self-help involvement and substance use outcomes. Addiction, 98, 499–508.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kelly, J., & Moos, R. (2003). Dropout from 12-step self-help groups: Prevalence, predictors, and counteracting treatment-related effects. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 24, 241–250.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kissin, W., McLeod, C., & McKay, J. (2003). The longitudinal relationship between self-help group attendance and course of recovery. Evaluation and Program Planning, 26, 311–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Laudet, A. B. (2003). Attitudes and beliefs about 12-step groups among addiction treatment clients and clinicians: Toward identifying obstacles to participation. Substance Use and Misuse, 38, 2017–2047.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Laudet, A. B., Cleland, C. M., Magura, S., Vogel, H. S., & Knight, E. L. (2004). Social support mediates the effects of dual-focus mutual aid groups on abstinence from substance use. American Journal of Community Psychology, 34, 175–185.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lebow, J., Kelly, J., Knobloch-Fedders, L., & Moos, R., (2006). Relationship factors in treating substance use disorders. In L. B. Castonguay, & L. E. Beutler (Eds.), Principles of therapeutic change that work (pp. 293–317). New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
  31. Longabaugh, R., Wirtz, P. W., Zweben, A., & Stout, R. (2001). Network support for drinking. In R. Longabaugh, & P. W. Wirtz (Eds.), Project MATCH: Hypotheses, results, and causal chain analyses (pp. 260–275). Rockville, MD: NIH. (Publication No. 01-4238).Google Scholar
  32. Luborsky, L., McLellan, A. T., Woody, G. E., O’Brien, C. P., & Auerbach, A., (1985). Therapist success and its determinants. Archives of General Psychiatry, 42, 602–611.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Magura, S. (2007). The relationship between substance user treatment and 12-step fellowships: Current knowledge and research questions. Substance Use and Misuse, 42, 343–360.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Magura, S., Laudet, A. B., Mahmood, D., Rosenblum, A., Vogel, H. S., & Knight, E. L. (2003). Role of self-help processes in achieving abstinence among dually diagnosed persons. Addictive Behaviors, 28, 399–413.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Maisto, S. A., Carey, K. B., & Bradizza, C. M. (1999). Social learning theory. In K. E. Leonard, & H. T. Blane (Eds.), Psychological theories of drinking and alcoholism (2 nd ed., pp. 106–163). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  36. Mankowski, E., Humphreys, K., & Moos, R. (2001). Individual and contextual predictors of involvement in twelve-step self-help groups after substance abuse treatment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29, 537–563.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McCrady, B. S., & Nathan, P. E., (2006). Treatment factors in treating substance use disorders. In L. B. Castonguay, & L. E. Beutler (Eds.), Principles of therapeutic change that work (pp. 319–340). New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
  38. McKay, J. R., Foltz, C., Stephens, R. C., Leahy, P. J., Crowley, E. M., & Kissin, W. (2005). Predictors of alcohol and crack cocaine use outcomes over a 3-year follow-up in treatment seekers. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 28(Supplement 1), S73–S82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McKay, J. R., Merikle, E., Mulvaney, F. D., Weiss, R. V., & Koppenhaver, J. M. (2001). Factors accounting for cocaine two years following initiation of continuing care. Addiction, 96, 213–225.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2002). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people for change (2 nd ed.). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  41. Moggi, F., Ouimette, P., Finney, J., & Moos, R. (1999). Dual diagnosis patients in substance abuse treatment: Relationships among general coping and substance –specific coping and one-year outcomes. Addiction, 94, 1805–1816.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Montgomery, H. A., Miller, W. R., & Tonigan, J. S. (1993). Differences among A.A. groups: Implications for research. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 54, 502–504.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Moos, R. (1994). Group Environment Scale manual (3rd ed.). Menlo Park, CA: Mind Garden.Google Scholar
  44. Moos, R. (1997). Evaluating treatment environments: The quality of psychiatric and substance abuse programs. New Brunswick, NJ: TransactionGoogle Scholar
  45. Moos, R. (2005). Iatrogenic effects of psychosocial interventions for substance use disorders: Prevalence, predictors, prevention. Addiction, 100, 595–604.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Moos, R. (2006). Social contexts and substance use. In W. R. Miller, & K. M. Carroll (Eds.), Rethinking substance abuse: What the science shows and what we should do about it (pp. 182–200). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  47. Moos, R. (2007a). Theory-based active ingredients of effective treatments for substance use disorders. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 88, 109–121.Google Scholar
  48. Moos, R. (2007b). Theory-based processes that promote remission of substance use disorders. Clinical Psychology Review, 27, 537–551.Google Scholar
  49. Moos, R., & Moos, B. (2006). Participation in treatment and Alcoholics Anonymous: A 16-year follow-up of initially untreated individuals. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62, 735–750.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Moos, R., & Moos, B. (2007). Protective resources and long-term recovery from alcohol use disorders. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 86, 46–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Moos, R., Moos, B., & Andrassy, J., (1999). Outcomes of four treatment approaches in community residential programs for patients with substance use disorders. Psychiatric Services, 50, 1577–1583.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Moos, R., Schaefer, J., Andrassy, J., & Moos, B. (2001). Outpatient mental health care, self-help groups, and patients’ 1-year treatment outcomes. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 57, 273–287.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Moos, R., & Timko, C. (2008). Outcome research on twelve-step and other self-help programs. In M. Galanter, & H. D. Kleber (Eds.), Textbook of substance abuse treatment (4th ed. pp. 511–521). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.Google Scholar
  54. Morgenstern, J., Kahler, C. W., & Epstein, E. (1998). Do treatment process factors mediate the relationship between type A-type B and outcome in 12-step oriented substance abuse treatment? Addiction, 93, 1765–1776.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Morgenstern, J., Labouvie, E., McCrady, B. S., Kahler, C. W., & Frey, R. M. (1997). Affiliation with Alcoholics Anonymous after treatment: A study of its therapeutic effects and mechanisms of action. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 768–777.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Morgenstern, J., & McCrady, B. (1992). Curative factors in alcohol and drug treatment: Behavioral and disease model perspectives. British Journal of Addiction, 87, 901–912.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Ouimette, P.C., Ahrens, C., Moos, R., & Finney, J. (1998). During treatment changes in substance abuse patients with posttraumatic stress disorder: Relationships to specific interventions and program environments. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 15, 555–564.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ouimette, P. C., Humphreys, K., Moos, R., Finney, J., Cronkite, R., & Federman, E. (2001). Self-help participation and functioning among substance use disorder patients with posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 20, 25–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Pagano, M. E., Friend, K. B., Tonigan, J. S., & Stout, R. L. (2004). Helping other alcoholics in Alcoholics Anonymous and Drinking Outcomes: Findings from Project MATCH. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 65, 766–773.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Snow, M. G., Prochaska, J. O., & Rossi, J. S. (1994). Processes of change in alcoholics anonymous: Maintenance factors in long-term sobriety. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 55, 362–371.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Timko, C., & Sempel, J. M. (2004). Intensity of acute services, self-help attendance, and one-year outcomes among dual diagnosis patients. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 65, 274–282.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Tonigan, J. S., Connors, G. J., & Miller, W. R. (2003). Participation and Involvement in Alcoholics Anonymous. In T. F. Babor, & F. K. Del Boca (Eds.), Matching Alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: The results of Project MATCH (pp. 184–204). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Weiss, R., Griffin, M., Gallop, R., Najavits, L., & Frank, A., (2005). The effect of 12-step self-help group attendance and participation on drug use outcomes among cocaine-dependent patients. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 77, 177–184.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Witbrodt, J., & Kaskutas, L. A. (2005). Does diagnosis matter? Differential effects of 12-step participation and social networks on abstinence. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 31, 685–707.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zemore, S. E., Kaskutas, L. A., & Ammon, L. N. (2004). In 12-step groups, helping helps the helper. Addiction, 99, 1015–1023.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Research Career Scientist and Professor, Center for Health Care Evaluation (152-MPD)VA Health Care SystemMenlo ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations