The Twelve-Step Recovery Model of AA: A Voluntary Mutual Help Association

Part of the Recent Developments in Alcoholism book series (RDIA, volume 18)


Alcoholism treatment has evolved to mean professionalized, scientifically based rehabilitation. Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) is not a treatment method; it is far better understood as a Twelve-Step Recovery Program within a voluntary self-help/mutual aid organization of self-defined alcoholics.

The Twelve-Step Recovery Model is elaborated in three sections, patterned on the AA logo (a triangle within a circle): The triangle’s legs represent recovery, service, and unity; the circle represents the reinforcing effect of the three legs upon each other as well as the “technology” of the sharing circle and the fellowship. The first leg of the triangle, recovery, refers to the journey of individuals to abstinence and a new “way of living.” The second leg, service, refers to helping other alcoholics which also connects the participants into a fellowship. The third leg, unity, refers to the fellowship of recovering alcoholics, their groups, and organizations. The distinctive AA organizational structure of an inverted pyramid is one in which the members in autonomous local groups direct input to the national service bodies creating a democratic, egalitarian organization maximizing recovery. Analysts describe the AA recovery program as complex, implicitly grounded in sound psychological principles, and more sophisticated than is typically understood. AA provides a nonmedicalized and anonymous “way of living” in the community and should probably be referred to as the Twelve-Step/Twelve Tradition Recovery Model in order to clearly differentiate it from professionally based twelve-step treatments. There are additional self-help/mutual aid groups for alcoholics who prefer philosophies other than AA.


Local Group Friendship Network Voluntary Association Identity Change Alcoholic Anonymous 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 12 & 12. (Twelve Steps and Twelve Traditions) (1974). New York: Alcoholics Anonymous World Services, Inc.Google Scholar
  2. 12 Concepts for World Service (illustrated) (1986). New York, NY: Alcoholics Anonymous World Services, Inc.Google Scholar
  3. 44 Questions (pamphlet) (1952, 1990). New York: Alcoholic Anonymous World Services, Inc.Google Scholar
  4. A.A. Service Manual Combined with 12 Concepts for World Service, 2006–2007. New York: Alcoholic Anonymous World Services, Inc. (Originally published in 1969)Google Scholar
  5. Agar, M. H. (1986). Speaking of ethnography. Beverly Hill, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  6. Alcoholics Anonymous: The story of how many thousands of men and women have recovered (1976). New York: Works Publishing. (Originally published in 1939)Google Scholar
  7. AACA. (1957). Alcoholics Anonymous comes of age: A brief history of A.A. New York, NY: Alcoholics Anonymous World Services.Google Scholar
  8. Alibrandi, L. A. (1978). The folk psychotherapy of Alcoholics Anonymous. In S. Zimberg, J. Wallace, & S. B. Blume (Eds.), Practical approaches to alcoholism psychotherapy (pp.163–180). New York, NY: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. A Member’s-Eye View of Alcoholics Anonymous (pamphlet) (1970). New York: Alcoholics Anonymous World Services, Inc.Google Scholar
  10. Arminen, I. (1998). Therapeutic Interaction: A Study of Mutual Help in the Meetings of Alcoholics Anonymous. Helsinki, Finland: The Finnish Foundation for Alcohol Studies, Vol. 45. Distributed by Rutgers University Center for Alcohol Studies, Publication Division, Piscataway, NJ.Google Scholar
  11. Bales, R. F. (1944). The therapeutic role of Alcoholics Anonymous as seen by a sociologist. Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 5(2), 267–278.Google Scholar
  12. Barrows, D. C. (1980). Informal interactions at an alcohol recovery home. March 17. Berkeley, Social Research Group, School of Public Health, University of California.Google Scholar
  13. Borden, A. (2007). The history of gay people in Alcoholics Anonymous. New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
  14. Borkman, T. (1999). Understanding self-help/mutual Aid: Experiential learning in the commons. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Borkman, T. (2006). Sharing experience, conveying hope: Egalitarian relations as the essential method of Alcoholics Anonymous. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 17(2) (Winter), 145–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Borkman, T. (2007). A.A. and two sober house systems: Work-in-progress. Seminar presentation on federation forms, Hauser Center for Nonprofit Studies, Harvard University, April 30.Google Scholar
  17. Brown, S. (1985). Treating the alcoholic: A developmental model of recovery. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  18. Brown, S. (1995). A developmental model of alcoholism and recovery. In S. Brown (Ed.), Treating Alcoholism (pp. 27–51). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  19. Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of Meaning. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Cain, C. (1991). Personal stories: Identity acquisition and self-understanding in Alcoholics Anonymous. Ethos, 19(2), 210–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chenhall, R. (2007). Benelong’s Haven, Victoria. Australia: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Denzin, N. K. (1997). The alcoholic society: Addiction and recovery of the self. New Brunswick, N.J.: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  23. De Soto, C. B., O’Donnell, W. E., & De Soto, J. L. (1989, September/October). Long-term recovery in alcoholics. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 13(5)(), 693–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. DiClemente, C. C. (1993). Alcoholics Anonymous and the structure of change. In B. S. McCrady, & W. R. Miller (Eds.), Research on Alcoholics Anonymous (pp. 79–97). New Jersey, NJ: Rutgers Center of Alcohol Studies.Google Scholar
  25. Forsyth, D. R. (2006). Group Dynamics (4th ed.). Belmont Calif.: Thomson-Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  26. Goldstrom, I. D., Campbell, J., Rogers, J. A., Lambert, D. B., Blacklow, B., Henderson, M. J., et al. (2006). National estimates for mental health mutual support groups, self-help organizations, and consumer-operated services. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 33(1)(January), 92–103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gottlieb, B. H., & Peters, L. (1991). A national demographic portrait of mutual aid group participants in Canada. American Journal of Community Psychology, 19(5), 651–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gubrium, J. (1988). Analyzing Field Reality. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  29. Hall, R. H. (1987). Organizations: Structure and Process (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice – Hall.Google Scholar
  30. Humphreys, K. (2003). Alcoholics Anonymous and 12-Step alcoholism treatment programs. In M. Galanter (Ed.). Research on alcoholism treatment. Vol 16 of Recent developments in alcoholism (pp. 149–164). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.Google Scholar
  31. Humphreys, K. (2004). Circles of recovery: Self-help organizations for addictions. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Humphreys, K., & Noke, J. M. (1997). The influence of posttreatment mutual help group participation on the friendship networks of substance abuse patients. American Journal of Community Psychology, 25(1), 1–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Humphreys, K., Mavis, B. E., & Stoffelmayr, B. E.(1994). Are twelve step programs appropriate for disenfranchised groups? Evidence from a study of posttreatment mutual help involvement. In F. Lavoie, T. Borkman, & B.Gidron (Eds.), Self-help and mutual aid groups (pp. 165–180). New York: Haworth.Google Scholar
  34. Khantzian, E. J., & Mack, J. E. (1994). Alcoholics Anonymous and contemporary psychodynamic theory. In M. Galanter (Ed.), Recent developments in alcoholism (7) (pp. 68–89). New York, NY: Plenum.Google Scholar
  35. Kitchin, H. A. (2002). Alcoholics Anonymous discourse and members’ resistance in a virtual community: Exploring tensions between theory and practice. Contemporary Drug Problems, 29(Winter), 748–778.Google Scholar
  36. Kurtz, E. (1979). Not God: A history of Alcoholics Anonymous. Center City, Minn.: Hazelden.Google Scholar
  37. Kurtz, E. (1982). Why A.A. works: The intellectual significance of Alcoholics Anonymous. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, (43), 38–80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Kurtz, L. F. (1997). Self-help and support groups: A handbook for practitioners. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  39. Laudet, A. B. (2008). The impact of Alcoholics Anonymous on other substance abuse related Twelve Step programs. In M. Galanter & L. A. Kaskutas (Eds.), Alcoholism research: Alcoholics Anonymous and spirituality 18, pp. 71--89. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.Google Scholar
  40. Lincoln, Y. S., & Denzin, N. K. (Eds.). (2003). Turning points in qualitative research: Tying knots in a handkerchief. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira, Division of Rowman & Littlefield Publ.Google Scholar
  41. Makela, K., Arminen, I., Bloomfield, K., Eisenbach-Stangl, I., Helmersson Bergmark, K., Kurube, N., et al. (1996). Alcoholics Anonymous as a mutual help movement: A study in eight societies . Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  42. Makela, K. (1993). International comparisons of Alcoholics Anonymous. Alcohol Health and Research World, 17(3). 228–234.Google Scholar
  43. Mattingly, C., & Garro, L. C. (Eds.). (2000). Narrative and the cultural construction of illness and healing. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  44. Maxwell, M. A. (1984). The A.A. experience. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  45. Medvene, L. J. (1984). Self-help and professional collaboration. Social Policy, 14(Spring), 15–18.Google Scholar
  46. Miller, W. R., & McGrady, B. S. (1993). The importance of research on Alcoholics Anonymous. In W. R. Miller, & B. S. McGrady (Eds.), Research on Alcoholics Anonymous (pp. 3–11). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Center of Alcohol Studies.Google Scholar
  47. Pagano. M. E., Friend. K. B., Tonigan, J. S., & Stout, R. L. (2004). Helping other alcoholics in Alcoholics Anonymous and drinking outcomes: Findings from project MATCH. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, November, 65, 766–773.Google Scholar
  48. Polcin D., & Borkman, T. (2008). The impact of A.A. on non-professionalized substance abuse recovery programs and sober living houses. In M. Galanter, & L. A. Kaskutas (Eds.), Alcoholism research: Alcoholics Anonymous and spirituality 18, pp. 91--108. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.Google Scholar
  49. Pollner, M., & Stein, J. (1996). Narrative mapping of social worlds: The voice of experience in Alcoholics Anonymous. Symbolic Interaction, 19(3), 203–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pollner, M., & Stein, J. (2001). Doubled over in laughter: Humor and the construction of selves in Alcoholics Anonymous. In J. F. Gubrium, & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Institutional selves: Troubled identities in a postmodern world. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Rappaport, J. (1993). Narrative studies, personal stories, and identity transformation in the mutual help context. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 29(2) (June), 239–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Riessman, C. K. (1993). Narrative analysis. Newbury Park, California: Sage.Google Scholar
  53. Riessman, F. (1965). The ‘Helper Therapy’ principle. Social Work, 10(2), 27–32.Google Scholar
  54. Riessman, F., & Carroll, D. (1995). Redefining self-help: Policy and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  55. Robertson, N. (1988). Getting better: Inside Alcoholics Anonymous. New York, NY: William Morrow & Co.Google Scholar
  56. Room, R.(1993). Alcoholics Anonymous as a social movement. In B. S. McCrady, & W. R. Miller (Eds.), Research on Alcoholics Anonymous (pp. 167–187). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Center of Alcohol Studies.Google Scholar
  57. Seabright, M. A., & Delacroix, J. (1996, June). The minimalist organization as a postbureaucratic form: The example of Alcoholics Anonymous. Journal of Management Inquiry, 5(2), 140–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Slaymaker, V. T., & Sheehan, T. (2008). The impact of A.A. on professional treatment. In M. Galanter, & L. A. Kaskutas (Eds.), Alcoholism research: Alcoholics Anonymous and spirituality 18, pp. 59--70. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.Google Scholar
  59. Steigerwald, F., & Stone, D. (1999). Cognitive restructuring and the 12-step program of Alcoholics Anonymous. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 16(4), 321–327.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Summers, N. (2007, May). A struggle inside A.A. Newsweek, 7, 46–48.Google Scholar
  61. Surgeon General’s Workshop on Self-Help and Public Health (1988). DHHS Public Health Service. HRSA, Bureau of Maternal and Child Health and Resource Development Publication No. 224–250.Washington DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  62. Thoits, P. A., & Hewitt, L. N. (2001, June). Volunteer work and well-being. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 42(), 115–131.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tiebout, H. (1944). Therapeutic mechanisms in Alcoholics Anonymous. American Journal of Psychiatry, 100, 468–473.Google Scholar
  64. Tonigan, J. S., Miller, W. R., & Schermer, C. (2002, September). Atheists, agnostics and Alcoholics Anonymous. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 63(), 534–541.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Uehara, E. S. (1995). Reciprocity reconsidered: Gouldner’s ‘moral norm of reciprocity’ and social support. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 12(4), 483–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Vaillant, G. E. (1995). The natural history of alcoholism revisited. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Valverde, M., & White-Mair, K. (1999, May). One day at a time and other slogans for everyday life: The ethical practices of Alcoholics Anonymous. Sociology, 33(2), 393–440.Google Scholar
  68. Van Til, J. (2000). Growing civil society: From nonprofit sector to third space. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Walters, G. D. (2002). Twelve reasons why we need to find alternative to Alcoholics Anonymous. Addictive Disorders & Their Treatment, 1(2), 53–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. White, W. L. (2006). Let’s go make some history: Chronicles of the new addiction recovery advocacy movement. Washington, D.C.: Johnson Institute.Google Scholar
  71. White, W. A., & Kurtz, E. (2008). Twelve defining moments in the history of Alcoholics Anonymous. In M. Galanter, & L. A. Kaskutas (Eds.), Alcoholism research: Alcoholics Anonymous and spirituality 18, pp. 37--57. New York, NY: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.Google Scholar
  72. Winegar, N., Stephens, T. A., Varney, E. D. (1987, April). Alcoholics Anonymous and the alcoholic defense structure. Social Casework(), 223–228.Google Scholar
  73. Zemore, S. E., & Kaskutas, L. A. (2004, May). Helping, spirituality and Alcoholics Anonymous in recovery. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 65(), 383–391.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Zohar, A., & Borkman, T. (1997, December). Emergent order and self-organization: A case study of Alcoholics Anonymous. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 26(4), 527–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Professor of SociologyEmerita George Mason UniversityFairfax, Virginia, Silver SpringUSA

Personalised recommendations