Advertisement

Facilitating Involvement in Twelve-Step Programs

  • Dennis M. Donovan
  • Anthony S. Floyd
Chapter
Part of the Recent Developments in Alcoholism book series (RDIA, volume 18)

Abstract.

Twelve-step programs represent a readily available resource for individuals with substance use disorders. These programs have demonstrated considerable effectiveness in helping substance abusers achieve and maintain abstinence and improve their overall psychosocial functioning and recovery. Despite these positive benefits associated with increased involvement in twelve-step self-help programs, many substance abusers do not affiliate or do so for only a short period of time before dropping out. Because of this, clinicians and researchers have sought ways to increase involvement in such self-help groups by facilitating meeting attendance and engagement in other twelve-step activities. The present chapter reviews the impact of treatment program orientation and specific interventions designed to facilitate twelve-step program involvement, subsequent meeting attendance, engagement in twelve-step activities, and alcohol and drug use. The findings of studies evaluating these approaches indicate that it is possible to increase twelve-step involvement and that doing so results in reduced substance use. The results suggest that incorporating these evidence-based interventions into standard treatment programs may lead to improved outcomes.

Keywords

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Substance Abuse Treatment Alcoholic Anonymous Motivational Enhancement Therapy Referral Condition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

Funding for this manuscript was provided in part from Cooperative Agreement 5 U10 DA13714, as part of the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network, U. S. National Institutes of Health. The opinions expressed in this paper are solely those of the authors, not of the sponsoring agency.

References

  1. 1.
    Humphreys K. (1999). Professional interventions that facilitate 12-step self-help group involvement. Alcohol Research and Health, 23(2), 93–98.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kelly J. F. (2003). Self-help for substance-use disorders: History, effectiveness, knowledge gaps, and research opportunities. Clinical Psychology Review, 23(5), 639-663.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Room R, & Greenfield T. (1993). Alcoholics Anonymous, other 12-step movements and psychotherapy in the US population, 1990. Addiction, 88(4), 555–562.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fuller R. K., & Hiller-Sturmhofel S. (1999). Alcoholism treatment in the United States. An overview. Alcohol Health & Research World, 23(2), 69–77.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hasin D. S., & Grant B. F. (1995). A.A. and other helpseeking for alcohol problems: Former drinkers in the U.S. general population. Journal of Substance Abuse, 7(3), 281–292.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kaskutas L. A., Weisner C, & Caetano R. (1997). Predictors of help seeking among a longitudinal sample of the general public, 1984–1992. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 58(2), 155–161.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Alford G. S., Koehler R. A., & Leonard J. (1991). Alcoholics Anonymous-Narcotics Anonymous model inpatient treatment of chemically dependent adolescents: A 2-year outcome study. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 52(2), 118–126.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    McElrath D. (1997). The minnesota model. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 29(2), 141–144.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Stinchfield R, & Owen P. (1998). Hazelden's model of treatment and its outcome. Addictive Behaviors, 23(5), 669–683.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Etheridge R. M., Craddock S. G., Hubbard R. L., & Rounds-Bryant J. L. (1999). The relationship of counseling and self-help participation to patient outcomes in DATOS. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 57(2), 99–112.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fiorentine R. (1999). After drug treatment: Are 12-step programs effective in maintaining abstinence? American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 25(1), 93–116.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Humphreys K. (2003). Alcoholics Anonymous and 12-step alcoholism treatment programs. Recent Developments in Alcoholism, 16, 149–164.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tonigan J. S., Toscova, R., & Miller, W.R. (1996). Meta-analysis of the literature on Alcoholics Anonymous: Sample and study characteristics moderate findings. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 57, 65–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Donovan D. M. (1999). Efficacy and effectiveness: Complementary findings from two multisite trials evaluating outcomes of alcohol treatments differing in theoretical orientations. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 23(3), 564–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Humphreys K, Wing S, McCarty D, Chappel J, Gallant L, Haberle B, et al. (2004). Self-help organizations for alcohol and drug problems: toward evidence-based practice and policy. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 26(3), 151–158.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kelly J. F., Stout R, Zywiak W, & Schneider R. (2006). A 3-year study of addiction mutual-help group participation following intensive outpatient treatment. Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research, 30(8), 1381–1392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Moos R. H., & Moos B. S. (2005). Paths of entry into alcoholics anonymous: consequences for participation and remission. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 29(10), 1858–1868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Emrick C. D., Tonigan J. S., Montgomery H., & Little L. (1993). Alcoholics Anonymous: What is currently known? In: B. S. McGrady & W. R. Miller, (Eds.) Research on Alcoholics Anonymous: Opportunities and Alternatives (pp. 41–76). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers Center of Alcohol Studies.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fiorentine R., & Hillhouse M. P. (2000). Drug treatment and 12-step program participation: the additive effects of integrated recovery activities. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 18(1), 65–74.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fiorentine R, & Hillhouse M. P. (2000). Exploring the additive effects of drug misuse treatment and Twelve-Step involvement: does Twelve-Step ideology matter? Substance Use and Misuse , 35(3), 367–397.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Harris, J, Best, D, Gossop, M, Marshall, J, Man, L. H., Manning, V, et al. (2003). Prior Alcoholics Anonymous (A.A.) affiliation and the acceptability of the Twelve Steps to patients entering UK statutory addiction treatment. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 64(2), 257–261.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kaskutas, L. A., Ammon, L., Delucchi, K., Room, R., Bond, J., & Weisner, C. (2005). Alcoholics anonymous careers: patterns of A.A. involvement five years after treatment entry. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 29(11), 1983–1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kaskutas, L. A., Bond, J., & Humphreys, K. (2002). Social networks as mediators of the effect of Alcoholics Anonymous. Addiction, 97(7), 891–900.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    McKay, J. R., Merikle, E., Mulvaney, F. D., Weiss, R. V., & Koppenhaver, J. M. (2001). Factors accounting for cocaine use two years following initiation of continuing care. Addiction, 96(2), 213–225.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Montgomery, H. A., Miller, W. R., & Tonigan, J. S. (1995). Does Alcoholics Anonymous involvement predict treatment outcome? Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 12, 241–246.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Moos, R. H., & Moos, B. S. (2004). Long-term influence of duration and frequency of participation in alcoholics anonymous on individuals with alcohol use disorders. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 72(1), 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Moos, R. H., & Moos, B. S. (2006). Participation in treatment and alcoholics anonymous: A 16-year follow-up of initially untreated individuals. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62(6), 735–750.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Morgenstern, J., Bux, D. A., Labouvie, E., Morgan, T., Blanchard, K. A., & Muench, F. (2003). Examining mechanisms of action in 12-Step community outpatient treatment. Drug & Alcohol Dependence, 72(3), 237–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Morgenstern, J., Labouvie, E., McCrady, B. S., Kahler, C. W., & Frey R. M. (1997). Affiliation with Alcoholics Anonymous after treatment: a study of its therapeutic effects and mechanisms of action. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65(5), 768–777.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ouimette, P. C., Moos, R. H., & Finney, J. W. (1998) Influence of outpatient treatment and 12-step group involvement on one-year substance abuse treatment outcomes. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 59(5), 513–522.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ouimette, P. G., Finney, J. W., & Moos, R. H. (1997). Twelve-step and cognitive-behavioral treatment for substance abuse: A comparison of treatment effectiveness. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 65, 230–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Project Match Research Group (1997). Matching alcoholism treatments to client heterogeneity: Project MATCH posttreatment drinking outcomes. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 58, 7–29.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Timko, C., & Debenedetti, A. (2007). A randomized controlled trial of intensive referral to 12-step self-help groups: One-year outcomes. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 90(2–3), 270–279.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Timko, C., DeBenedetti, A., & Billow, R. (2006). Intensive referral to 12-Step self-help groups and 6-month substance use disorder outcomes. Addiction, 101(5), 678–688.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tonigan, J. S. (2001). Benefits of alcoholics anonymous attendance: Replication of findings between clinical research sites in Project MATCH. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 19(1), 67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Watson, C. G., Hancock, M., Gearhart, L. P., Mendez, C. M., Malovrh, P., & Raden, M. A. (1997). comparative outcome study of frequent, moderate, occasional, and nonattenders of Alcoholics Anonymous. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 53, 209–214.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Weiss, R. D., Griffin, M. L., Gallop, R. J., Najavits, L. M., Frank, A., Crits-Christoph, P., et al. (2005). The effect of 12-step self-help group attendance and participation on drug use outcomes among cocaine-dependent patients. Drug Alcohol Depend, 77(2), 177–184.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Connors, G. J., Tonigan, J. S., Miller, W. R., & Group, M. R. (2001). A longitudinal model of intake symptomatology, A.A. participation and outcome: retrospective study of the Project MATCH outpatient and aftercare samples. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 62(6), 817–825.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    McKellar, J., Stewart, E., & Humphreys, K. (2003). Alcoholics anonymous involvement and positive alcohol-related outcomes: Consequence, or just a correlate? A prospective 2-year study of 2,319 alcohol-dependent men. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 71(2), 302–308.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Humphreys, K., & Moos, R. H. (2001). Can encouraging substance abuse patients to participate in self-help groups reduce demand for health care? A quasi-experimental study. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 25(5), 71–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Humphreys, K, & Moos, R. H. (2007). Encouraging posttreatment self-help group involvement to reduce demand for continuing care services: Two-year clinical and utilization outcomes. Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research, 31(1), 64–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Caldwell, P. E., & Cutter, H. S. (1998). Alcoholics Anonymous affiliation during early recovery. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 15(3), 221–228.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Gilbert, F. S. (1991). Development of a “Steps Questionnaire”. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 52(4), 353–360.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Montgomery, H. A., Miller, W. R., & Tonigan, J. S. (1995). Does Alcoholics Anonymous involvement predict treatment outcome? Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 12, 241–246.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Weiss, R. D., Griffin, M. L., Gallop, R, Onken, L. S., Gastfriend, D. R., Daley, D., et al. (2000). Self-help group attendance and participation among cocaine dependent patients. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 60(2), 169–177.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Tonigan, J. S., Connors, G. J., & Miller, W. R. (1996). Alcoholics Anonymous Involvement (AAI) scale: Reliability and norms. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 10(2), 75–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Morgenstern, J., Kahler, C.W., Frey, R.M., & Labouvie, E. (1996). Modeling therapeutic response to 12-step treatment: Optimal responders, nonresponders, and partial responders. Journal of Substance Abuse, 8, 45–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Godlaski, T. M., Leukefeld, C., & Cloud, R. (1997). Recovery: With and without self-help. Substance Use and Misuse, 32(5), 621–627.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Kelly, J. F., & Moos, R. (2003). Dropout from 12-step self-help groups: prevalence, predictors, and counteracting treatment influences. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 24(3), 241–250.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Rawson, R. A., Obert, J. L., McCann, M. J., Castro, F. G., & Ling, W. (1991). Cocaine abuse treatment: A review of current strategies. Journal of Substance Abuse, 3(4), 457–491.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Weiss, R. D., Griffin, M. L., Najavits, L. M., Hufford, C., Kogan, J., Thompson, H. J., et al. (1996). Self-help activities in cocaine dependent patients entering treatment: results from NIDA collaborative cocaine treatment study. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 43(1–2), 79–86.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Caldwell, P. E. (1999). Fostering client connections with Alcoholics Anonymous: a framework for social workers in various practice settings. Social Work in Health Care, 28(4), 45–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Zweben, J. E. (1987). Recovery-oriented psychotherapy: Facilitating the use of 12-step programs. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 19(3), 243–251.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Thomassen, L. (2002). A.A. utilization after introduction in outpatient treatment. Substance Use and Misuse, 37(2), 239–253.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Wallen, M. C., Weiner, H. D., Mansi, A, & Deal, D. (1987). Utilization of 12-step theme groups in a short-term chemical dependence treatment unit. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 19(3), 287–290.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Humphreys, K. (1997). Clinicians' referral and matching of substance abuse patients to self-help groups after treatment. Psychiatric Services, 48(11), 1445–1449.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Laudet, A. B., & White, W. L. (2005). An exploratory investigation of the association between clinicians' attitudes toward twelve-step groups and referral rates. Alcohol Treatment Quarterly, 23(1), 31–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Sisson, R. W., & Mallams, J. H. (1981). The use of systematic encouragement and community access procedures to increase attendance at Alcoholic Anonymous and Al-Anon meetings. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 8(3), 371–376.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Tonigan, J. S., Connors, G. J., & Miller, W. R. (2003). Participation and involvement in Alcoholics Anonymous. In: T. F. Babor & F. K. Del Boca (Eds.). Treatment Matching in Alcoholism (pp. 184–204). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Swindle, R. W., Peterson, K. A., Paradise, M. J., & Moos, R. H. (1995). Measuring substance abuse program treatment orientations: The Drug and Alcohol Program Treatment Inventory. Journal of Substance Abuse, 7(1), 61–78.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Humphreys, K., Huebsch, P. D., Finney, J. W., & Moos, R. H. (1999). A comparative evaluation of substance abuse treatment: V. Substance abuse treatment can enhance the effectiveness of self-help groups. Alcohol: Clinical and Experimental Research, 23(3), 558–563.Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Ouimette, P. C., Finney, J. W., Gima, K., & Moos, R. H. (1999). A comparative evaluation of substance abuse treatment III. Examining mechanisms underlying patient-treatment matching hypotheses for 12-step and cognitive-behavioral treatments for substance abuse. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 23(3), 545–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Carroll, K. M., Nich, C, Ball, S. A., McCance, E., Frankforter, T. L., & Rounsaville, B. J. (2000). One-year follow-up of disulfiram and psychotherapy for cocaine-alcohol users: Sustained effects of treatment. Addiction, 95(9), 1335–1349.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Carroll, K. M., Nich, C, Ball, S. A., McCance, E., & Rounsavile, B. J. (1998). Treatment of cocaine and alcohol dependence with psychotherapy and disulfiram. Addiction, 93(5), 713–727.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Morgenstern, J., Blanchard, K. A., Morgan, T. J., Labouvie, E, & Hayaki, J. (2001). Testing the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral treatment for substance abuse in a community setting: within treatment and posttreatment findings. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 69(6), 1007–1017.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Nowinski, J., & Baker, S. (1992). The twelve step facilitation handbook: A systematic approach to early recovery from alcoholism and addiction. New York: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Nowinski, J., Baker, S., & Carroll, K. (1992). Twelve step facilitation therapy manual: A clinical research guide for therapists treating individuals with alcohol abuse and dependence. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism.Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Project MATCH Research Group (1993). Project MATCH: Rationale and methods for a multisite clinical trial matching patients to alcoholism treatment. Alcoholism: Clinical & Experimental Research, 17, 1130–1145.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Donovan, D. M., Carroll, K. M., Kadden, R. M., & DiClemente, C. C., Rounsavile B. J. (2003). Therapies for matching: Selection, development, implementation, and costs. In: T. F. Babor & F. K. Del Boca (Eds.). Treatment matching in alcoholism (pp. 42–61). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Donovan, D. M., Kadden, R. M., DiClemente, C. C., Carroll, K. M., Longabaugh, R., Zweben, A., et al. (1994). Issues in the selection and development of therapies in alcoholism treatment matching research. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, (Suppl.12), 138–148.Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Longabaugh, R., Donovan, D. M., Karno, M. P., McCrady, B. S., Morgenstern, J., & Tonigan, J. S. (2005). Active ingredients: How and why evidence-based alcohol behavioral treatment interventions work. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 29(2), 235–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Baker S. (1998). Twelve Step Facilitation for Drug Dependence. New Haven, CT: Psychotherapy Development Center, Department of Psychiatry, Yale University.Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Brook, D. W., & Spitz, H. I., (Eds.) (2002). The group therapy of substance abuse. New York, NY: The Haworth Medical Press.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Flores, P. J., & Georgi, J. M. (2005). Substance abuse treatment: Group therapy. Rockville, MD: Center for Substance Abuse Treatment, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration,.Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Stinchfield, R., Owen, P. L., & Winters, K. C. (1994). Group therapy for substance abuse: A review of the empirical evidence. In A. Fuhriman & G. M. Burlinggame, (Eds.), Handbook of group psychotherapy: An empirical and clinical synthesis (pp. 458–488). New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Weiss, R. D., Jaffee, W. B., de Menil, V. P., & Cogley, C. B. (2004). Group therapy for substance use disorders: What do we know? Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 12(6), 339–350.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Brown, T. G., Seraganian, P., Tremblay, J., Annis, H. (2002). Matching substance abuse aftercare treatments to client characteristics. Addictive Behaviors, 27(4), 585–604.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Brown, T. G., Seraganian, P., Tremblay, J., & Annis, H. (2002). Process and outcome changes with relapse prevention versus 12-Step aftercare programs for substance abusers. Addiction, 97, 677–689.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Maude-Griffin, P. M., Hohenstein, J. M., Humfleet, G. L., Reilly, P. M., Tusel, D. J., & Hall, S. M. (1998). Superior efficacy of cognitive-behavioral therapy for urban crack cocaine abusers: Main and matching effects. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 66(5), 832–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Cisler, R., Holder, H. D., Longabaugh, R., Stout, R. L., & Zweben, A. (1998). Actual and estimated replication costs for alcohol treatment modalities: Case study from Project MATCH. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 59(5), 503–512.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Humphreys, K, & Moos, R. (2001). Can encouraging substance abuse patients to participate in self-help groups reduce demand for health care? Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 25(5), 711–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Bien, T. H., Miller, W. R., & Boroughs, J. M. (1993). Motivational interviewing with alcohol outpatients. Behavioural & Cognitive Psychotherapy, 21(4), 347–356.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Brown, J. M., & Miller, W. R. (1993). Impact of motivational interviewing on participation and outcome in residential alcoholism treatment. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 7(4), 211–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Walitzer, K. S., Dermen, K. H., & Connors, G. J. (1993). Strategies for preparing clients for treatment. A review. Behavior Modification, 23(1), 129–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Connors, G. J., Walitzer, K. S., & Dermen, K. H. (2002). Preparing clients for alcoholism treatment: effects on treatment participation and outcomes. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70(5), 1161–169.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Connors, G. J., Walitzer, K. S., & Dermen, K. H. (2001). Preparation for alcoholism treatment: Effects on treatment attendance and post-treatment drinking. Addiction Biology, 6(3), 276–277.Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Kahler, C. W., Read, J. P., Stuart, G. L., Ramsey, S. E., McCrady, B. S., & Brown, R. A. (2004) Motivational enhancement for 12-step involvement among patients undergoing alcohol detoxification. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72(4), 736–741.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Blondell, R. D., Looney, S. W., Northington, A. P., Lasch, M. E., Rhodes, S. B., & McDaniels R. L. (2001). Using recovering alcoholics to help hospitalized patients with alcohol problems. Journal of Family Practice, 50(5), E1.Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Chappel, J. N., & DuPont, R. L. (1999). Twelve-step and mutual-help programs for addictive disorders. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 22(2), 425–446.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Collins, G. B., & Barth, J. (1979). Using the resources of A.A. in treating alcoholics in a general hospital. Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 30(7), 480–482.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Owen, P. L., Slaymaker, V, Tonigan, J. S., McCrady, B. S., Epstein, E. E., Kaskutas, L. A., et al. (2003). Participation in alcoholics anonymous: intended and unintended change mechanisms. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 27(3), 524–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Kaskutas, L. A., & Oberste, E. (2002). MAAEZ: Making Alcoholics Anonymous Easier. Berkeley, CA: Public Health Institute.Google Scholar
  93. 93.
    Rudy, D. R. (1986). Becoming alcoholic: Alcoholics Anonymous and the reality of alcoholism. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  94. 94.
    McCrady, B. S. (1994). Alcoholics Anonymous and behavior therapy: Can habits be treated as diseases? Can diseases be treated as habits. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62(6), 159–1166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dennis M. Donovan
    • 1
  • Anthony S. Floyd
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral SciencesAlcohol & Drug Abuse Institute and, University of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  2. 2.Alcohol & Drug Abuse Institute, University of WashingtonSeattleUSA

Personalised recommendations