Institutions for Better Regulation: The Example of the Netherlands, 2002–2007

  • Robin Linschoten
  • Jeroen Nijland
  • Jaap Sleifer
Part of the International Studies in Entrepreneurship book series (ISEN, volume 20)


This chapter describes the institutions for cutting administrative burdens in the Netherlands. Based on an evaluation of the World Bank, the following criteria are discerned: Measurement, reduction targets, coordinating minister, and incorporation in the regulatory process. The chapter examines how the institutions helped to change the policy culture. Moreover, it is argued that the institutions can be effectively applied in other countries and for a broader scope of better regulation including administrative burdens for citizens and compliance costs.


Civil Servant Base Measurement Policy Objective Reduction Target Good Regulation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Alberto Alesina and Roberto Perotti (2004), “The European Union: A Politically Incorrect View” in: Journal of Economic Perspectives (Volume 18, Number 4) pp. 27–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Commissie Administratieve Lasten (Slechte) (1999), Regels zonder overlast; minder eenvoudiger, sneller, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  3. Commissie tot verlichting van administratieve verplichtingen voor het bedrijfsleven (Grapperhaus) (1985), Heerendiensten, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  4. EIM, Monitor administratieve lasten (several years), ZoetermeerGoogle Scholar
  5. EIM (2007), Pilotonderzoek overage nalevingskosten van bestaande wetgeving, ZoetermeerGoogle Scholar
  6. IOO (2005), Verinnerlijking administratieve lasten, Leiden [see also the English translation by the Working Party on Regulatory Management and Reform of the OECD, Internalisation of Administrative Burdens (Paris 2006) Room document 12Google Scholar
  7. IOO (2007), Verinnerlijking administratieve lasten, LeidenGoogle Scholar
  8. IPAL (2006), Dit willen we even kwijt, The HagueGoogle Scholar
  9. Linschoten Robin, Hans Kamps, Jaap Sleifer (2008), “Cultuuromslag in de wetgeving” in Regelmaat 2008/2Google Scholar
  10. OECD (2007), Cutting red tape: administrative simplification in the Netherlands, ParisGoogle Scholar
  11. Regioplan beleidsonderzoek (2007), Overige nalevingskosten gemeten. Proefmeting reductiepotentieelmethode, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  12. Tweede Kamer (2006–2007), 29515, nr. 202Google Scholar
  13. World Bank Group (2007), Review of the Dutch Administrative Burden Reduction Program, WashingtonGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dutch Advisory Board on Administrative Burden (Actal)The Hague

Personalised recommendations