Regulatory Impact Analysis: Integrating Pro-growth Decisions into Public Policy in Developing Countries

Part of the International Studies in Entrepreneurship book series (ISEN, volume 20)


Many countries today have placed regulatory reform programs at the core of their governance and microeconomic strategies. Within those reforms, regulatory impact assessment (RIA) has become a prominent tool by which governments integrate benefits and costs of public policy into a balance that achieves, over time, the country’s development priorities. The spread of RIA into less-developed countries is largely due to intense pressures to stimulate growth, particularly pro-poor growth. Although RIA began as a set of analytical methods, RIA has evolved into a framework for public-private cooperation that can greatly improve the relationship between public and private sectors in effective and efficient public policy. Yet business representatives have not, in general, built capacities to assess proposals from governments, nor the capacities to collect relevant and timely information that can support the process of discovering the right solution. The private sector should ensure that it is a constructive partner in the consultation process by supplying timely, relevant, and reliable information through the consultation process.


Consultation Process Business Association Regulatory Reform Business Representative Regulatory Impact Analysis 


  1. Commission of the European Communities (2005) Better Regulation for Growth and Jobs in the European Union, Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, Brussels, 16.3.2005, COM(2005) 97 finalGoogle Scholar
  2. Department of the Taoiseach (July 2005) Report on the Introduction of Regulatory Impact Analysis, Dublin.Google Scholar
  3. European Commission (2002) Communication from the Commission: Towards a reinforced culture of consultation and dialogue – General principles and minimum standards for consultation of interested parties by the Commission Brussels, COM(2002) 704 finalGoogle Scholar
  4. OECD (2002) Regulatory Policies in OECD Countries: From Interventionism to Regulatory Governance, OECD, Paris.Google Scholar
  5. Scott Jacobs (2006) “Current Trends in Regulatory Impact Analysis: Mainstreaming RIA Into Policy-Making,” Jacobs and Associates Reports, 2006, at
  6. Background LiteratureGoogle Scholar
  7. Andrea Renda (2006) Impact assessment in the EU: the state-of-the-art and the art of the state, Center for European Policy Studies, Brussels.Google Scholar
  8. Canada. External Advisory Committee on Smart Regulation (September 2004) Smart Regulation: A Regulatory Strategy for Canada, Ottawa.Google Scholar
  9. European Commission (15 June 2005) Impact Assessment Guidelines, SEC(2005) 791, Brussels.Google Scholar
  10. UK Better Regulation TaskForce (March 2005) Regulation – Less is More. Reducing Burdens, Improving Outcomes, A BRTF report to the Prime Minister, London.Google Scholar
  11. US Office of the President(1993, 2002) Regulatory Planning and Review, Executive Order 12866, as amended by E.O. 13258 (67 Fed. Reg. 9,385 (2002)).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Jacobs and AssociatesWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations