Skip to main content

An approach to modeling group behaviors and beliefs in conflict situations

  • Conference paper
Social Computing, Behavioral Modeling, and Prediction

Abstract

In modern theater military operations, increasing attention is being directed to the coordination of military operations with ongoing social and economic redevelopment and the reformation of a viable political process. Recent experiences in Somalia, Bosnia, Afghanistan and Iraq have resulted in the formulation by the US Army of a specific doctrine, known as DIME (Diplomatic, Informational, Military and Economic) to coordinate all aspects of operations. A key technical requirement for DIME is the evolution of models of population belief and behavioral responses to planned tactical operations. In this paper, we describe an approach to modeling the responses of population groups to overt manipulations over time periods of days to weeks. The model is derived from extensive past successful work by the authors in using computational cognitive models to reason about the beliefs, desires and intentions of individuals and groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alford, C.F.. (1994) Group Processes and Political Theory.Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Atkinson, M. (2003) Contract nets for control of distributed agents in unmanned air vehicles. In Proceedings of the 2 nd AIAA “Unmanned Unlimited” Conference, San Diego, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Atkinson, M. (2004) Results analysis of using free market auctions to distribute control of unmanned air vehicles. In Proceedings of the 3 rd AIAA “Unmanned Unlimited” Conference. Chicago. IL.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Axelrod, R. (1997) The Complexity of Cooperation. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brown, R. (2001) Group Processes: Dynamics With and Between Groups. 2nd Ed. Blackwell Publishing, London.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carbonell, J. (1978) Politics: Automated ideological reasoning, Cognitive Science, 2/1: 27-51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Carbonell, J. (1979) The counterplanning process: a model of decision making in adverse conditions. Research Report, Department of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cederman, Lars-Erik (1997) Emergent Actors in World Politics: How states and nations develop and dissolve.Princeton University Press, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Geddes, N.D. (1989) Understanding human operators’ intentions in complex systems. Ph.D. Thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Geddes, N.D. (1994) A model for intent interpretation for multiple agents with conflicts. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, SMC-94. San Antonio, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Geddes, N.D. (1997) Large scale models of cooperative and hostile intentions, in Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society International Conference and Workshop on Engineering of Computer Based Systems(ECBS’97), Monterey, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Geddes, N.D. and Lizza, C.S. (1999) Shared plans and situations as a basis for collaborative decision making in air operations. SAE World Aeronautics Conference, Irving CA. SAE Paper 1999- 5538.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Geddes, N.D. and Lizza, C.S. (2001) Practical Applications of a Real Time, Dynamic Model of Intentions. AAAI Fall Symposium, Cape Cod MA.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hogg, M. (2000) Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes. Blackwell Publishing, London.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this paper

Cite this paper

Geddes, N.D., Atkinson, M.L. (2008). An approach to modeling group behaviors and beliefs in conflict situations. In: Liu, H., Salerno, J.J., Young, M.J. (eds) Social Computing, Behavioral Modeling, and Prediction. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77672-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77672-9_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-77671-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-77672-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics