Advertisement

General Growth Mixture Analysis with Antecedents and Consequences of Change

  • Hanno Petras
  • Katherine Masyn
Chapter

Abstract

Many studies of youth, adolescents, and adults related to delinquent, antisocial, and criminal offending, have utilized a language of trajectory typologies to describe individual differences in the behavioral course manifest in their longitudinal data. The two most common statistical methods currently in use are the semiparametric group-based modeling, also known as latent class growth analysis and general growth mixture analysis, with the latter method being the focus of this chapter. In concert with the growing popularity of these data-driven, group-based methods for studying developmental and life-course behavior trajectories have come active and spirited ontological discussions about the nature of the emergent trajectory groups resulting from the analyses. In this chapter, we presuppose that there are analytic, empirical, and substantive advantages inherent in using discrete components to (partially) describe population heterogeneity in longitudinal processes. Conceptually as well as empirically, we will discuss the use of auxiliary information in terms of antecedents and consequences of trajectory group membership. The inclusion of auxiliary information in growth mixture analysis is a necessary step in understanding as well as evaluating the fidelity and utility of the resultant trajectory profiles from a given study, regardless of one’s beliefs about the veracity of the method itself.

Keywords

Latent Class Class Membership Distal Outcome Growth Mixture Model Latent Growth Curve Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgement

We like to thank Alex Piquero, David Weisburd, Nicholas Ialongo and Bengt Muthén for their helpful comments on a prior draft of this manuscript.

References

  1. Bandeen-Roche K, Miglioretti DL, Zeger SL, Rathouz PJ (1997) Latent variable regression for multiple discrete outcomes. J Am Stat Assoc 92(440):1375–1386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bauer DJ, Curran PJ (2003) Distributional assumptions of growth mixture models: implications for overextraction of latent trajectory classes. Psychol Methods 8:338–363CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bauer DJ, Curran PJ (2004) The integration of continuous and discrete latent variable models: potential problems and promising opportunities. Psychol Methods 9:3–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bollen KA, Curran PJ (2006) Latent curve models: a structural equation perspective. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Hoboken, NJGoogle Scholar
  5. Boscardin C, Muthén B, Francis D, Baker E (2008) Early identification of reading difficulties using heterogeneous developmental trajectories. J Educ Psychol 100:192–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Broidy LM, Nagin DS, Tremblay RE, Bates JE, Brame B, Dodge KA, Fergusson D, Horwood JL, Loeber R, Laird R, Lyman DR, Moffitt TE, Pettit GS, Vitaro F (2003) Developmental trajectories of childhood disruptive behaviors and adolescent delinquency: a six-site, cross-national study. Dev Psychol 39:222–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bushway SD, Brame R, Paternoster RE (1999) Assessing stability and change in criminal offending: a comparison of random effects, semiparametric, and fixed effects modeling strategies. J Quantit Criminol 15:23–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Duncan TE, Duncan SC, Strycker LA (2006) An introduction to latent variable growth curve modeling: concepts, issues, and applications, 2nd edn. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJGoogle Scholar
  9. Ensminger ME, Kellam SG, Rubin BR (1983) School and family origins of delinquency: comparisons by sex. In: Van Dusen KT, Mednick SA (eds) Prospective studies of crime and delinquency, Kluwer-Niejhoff, Boston, pp 73–97Google Scholar
  10. Feldman B, Masyn K, Conger R (2008) Assessing the quality of prediction from adolescent problem-behavior trajectories to distal categorical outcomes. Manuscript submitted for publicationGoogle Scholar
  11. Hawkins JD, Herrenkohl TI, Farrington DP, Brewer D, Catalano RF, Harachi TW, Cothern L (2000) Predictors of youth violence. Off Juv Justice Delinq Prev Bull 4:1–11Google Scholar
  12. Heckman J, Singer B (1984) A method for minimizing the distributional assumptions in econometric models for duration data. Econometrica 52:271–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hedecker D, Gibbons RD (2008) Supermix – mixed effects models. Scientific Software International, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  14. Hipp JR, Bauer DJ (2006) Local solutions in the estimation of growth mixture models. Psychol Methods 11(1):36–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hox JJ (2000) Multilevel analysis of grouped and longitudinal data. In: Little TD, Schnabel KU, Baumert J (eds) Modeling longitudinal and multiple-group data. Practical issues, applied approaches, and specific examples, Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJGoogle Scholar
  16. Hox JJ (2002) Multilevel analysis. Techniques and applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJGoogle Scholar
  17. Hu L, Bentler P (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equation Model 6(1):1–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jones BL, Nagin DS, Roeder K (2001) A SAS procedure based on mixture models for estimating developmental trajectories. Sociol Methods Res 29:374–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jöreskog KG Sörbom D (1996) LISREL 8: structural equation modeling. Scientific Software International, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  20. Kellam SG, Brown CH, Poduska JM, Ialongo NS, Wang W, Toyinbo P, Petras H, Ford C, Windham A, Wilcox HC (2008) Effects of a universal classroom behavior management program in first and second grades on young adult behavioral, psychiatric, and social outcomes. Drug Alcohol Depend 95:S5–S28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kreuter F, Muthén B (2008) Analyzing criminal trajectory profiles: bridging multilevel and group-based approaches using growth mixture modeling. J Quant Criminol 24:1–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lo Y, Mendell N, Rubin D (2001) Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika 88:767–778CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Loeber R, Hay D (1997) Key issues in the development of aggression and violence from childhood to early adulthood. Annu Rev Psychol 48:371–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lubke GH, Spies JR (2008) Choosing a “correct” factor mixture model: power, limitations, and graphical data exploration. In: GR Hancock, Samuelson KM (eds) Advances in latent variable mixture models, Information Age Publishing, Charlotte, NC, pp 343–361Google Scholar
  25. Lynam DR (1996) The early identification of chronic offenders: who is the fledging psychopath? Psychol Bull 120:209–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Magnusson D (1998) The logic and implications of a person-oriented approach. In: Cairns RB, Bergman LR, Kagan J (eds) Methods and models for studying the individual, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp 33–64Google Scholar
  27. Maughan B, Rutter M (1998) Continuities and discontinuities in antisocial behavior from childhood to adult life. In: Ollendick TH, Prinz RJ (eds) Advances in clinical child psychology, vol. 20. Plenum, New York, pp 1–47Google Scholar
  28. McCord J, Ensminger ME (1997) Multiple risks and co-morbidity in an African-American population. Crim Behav Ment Health 7:339–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. McLachlan G, Peel D (2000). Finite mixture models. Wiley, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Meredith W, Tisak J (1990) Latent curve analysis. Psychometrika 55:107–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Moffitt TE (1993) Adolescent-limited and life-course persistent antisocial behavior: a developmental taxonomy. Psychol Rev 100:674–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Muthén B (2000) Methodological issues in random coefficient growth modeling using a latent variable framework: applications to the development of heavy drinking in ages 18–37. In: Rose JS, Chassin L, Presson C, Sherman J (eds) Multivariate applications in substance use research: new methods for new questions, Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, pp 113–140Google Scholar
  33. Muthén B (2001) Second-generation structural equation modeling with a combination of categorical and continuous latent variables: new opportunities for latent class/latent growth modeling. In: Collins LM, Sayer A (eds) New methods for the analysis of change, APA, Washington, DC, pp 291–322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Muthén B (2003) Statistical and substantive checking in growth mixture modeling. Psychol Methods 8:369–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Muthén B (2004) Latent variable analysis: growth mixture modeling and related techniques for longitudinal data. In: Kaplan D (ed) Handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences, Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp 345–368Google Scholar
  36. Muthén B (2006) The potential of growth mixture modeling. Commentary. Infant Child Dev 15:623–625CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Muthén B, Asparouhov T (2008) Growth mixture modeling: analysis with non-gaussian random effects. In: Fitzmaurice G, Davidian M, Verbeke G, Molenberghs G (eds) Longitudinal data analysis, Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 143–165Google Scholar
  38. Muthén B, Asparouhov T (2007) Wald test of mean equality for potential latent class predictors in mixture modeling. (Unpublished web note). http://www.statmodel.com
  39. Muthén B, Brown CH, Masyn K, Jo B, Khoo ST, Yang CC, Wang CP, Kellam S, Carlin J, Liao J (2002) General growth mixture modeling for randomized preventive interventions. Biostatistics 3:459–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Muthén BO, Curran PJ (1997) General longitudinal modeling of individual differences in experimental designs: a latent variable framework for analysis and power estimation. Psychol Methods 2:371–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Muthén B, Muthén LK (2000) Integrating person-centered and variable-centered analyses: growth mixture modeling with latent trajectory classes. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 24:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Muthén B, Muthén LK (1998–2008) Mplus (Version 5.1) [Computer software]. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles CAGoogle Scholar
  43. Muthén LK, Muthén B (1998–2008) Mplus user’s guide. 5th ed. Muthén & Muthén, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  44. Muthén B, Shedden K (1999) Finite mixture modeling with mixture outcomes using the EM algorithm. Biometrics 6:463–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nagin DS (1999) Analyzing developmental trajectories: a semiparametric, group-based approach. Psychol Methods 4:139–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nagin DS, Land KC (1993) Age, criminal careers, and population heterogeneity: specification and estimation of a nonparametric, mixed Poisson model. Criminology 31:327–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nagin D, Tremblay RE (1999) Trajectories of boys’ physical aggression, opposition, and hyperactivity on the path to physically violent and nonviolent juvenile delinquency. Child Dev 70:1181–1196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nagin DS, Tremblay R (2005) Developmental trajectory groups: fact or a useful statistical fiction? Criminology 43(4):873–903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Nagin D (2005) Group-based modeling of development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  50. Nylund KL, Asparouhov T, Muthén B (2007) Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: a monte carlo simulation study. Struct Equation Model 14:535–569Google Scholar
  51. Nylund KL, Masyn KE (2008) Covariates and latent class analysis: results of a simulation study. Paper presented at the society for prevention research annual meetingGoogle Scholar
  52. Patterson GR, DeBaryshe BD, Ramsey E (1989) A developmental perspective on antisocial behavior. Am Psychol 44:329–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Patterson GR, Forgatch MS, Yoerger KL, Stoolmiller M (1998) Variables that initiate and maintain an early-onset trajectory for juvenile offending. Dev Psychopathol 10:531–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Petras H, Schaeffer CM, Ialongo N, Hubbard S, Muthen B, Lambert S, Poduska J, Kellam S (2004) When the course of aggressive behavior in childhood does not predict antisocial behavior: an examination of potential explanatory variables. Dev Psychopathol 16:919–941CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Petras H, Kellam SG, Brown H, Muthén B, Ialongo N, Poduska JM (2008) Developmental epidemiological courses leading to antisocial personality disorder and violent and criminal behavior: effects by young adulthood of a universal preventive intervention in first- and second-grade classrooms. Drug Alcohol Depend 95:S45–S59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Petras H, Masyn K, Ialongo N (2008) The distal impact of two first-grade preventive interventions on aggressive disruptive behavior in adolescence – An application of a latent transition hybrid model. Manuscript in preparationGoogle Scholar
  57. Picquero A (2008) Taking stock of developmental trajectories of criminal activity over the life course. In: Liberman AM (ed) The long view of crime: a synthesis of longitudinal Research, Springer Publication, New York, pp 23–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rabe-Hesketh S, Skrondal A, Pickles A (2004) GLLAMM Manual. U.C. berkeley division of biostatistics working paper series. Working paper 160Google Scholar
  59. Rasbash J, Steele F, Browne W, and Prosser B (2004) A user’s guide to MLwiN version 2.0. Institute of Education, LondonGoogle Scholar
  60. Ramaswamy V, Desarbo WS, Reibstein DJ, Robinson WT (1993) An empirical pooling approach for estimating marketing mix elasticities with PIMS data. Mark Sci 12(1):103–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Raudenbush SW, Bryk AS (2002) Hierarchical linear models: applications and data analysis methods. 2nd ed. Sage Publications, Newbury Park, CAGoogle Scholar
  62. Raudenbush SW, Bryk AS, Cheong Y Congdon R (2000) HLM 5: hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Scientific Software International, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  63. Roeder K, Lynch, KG Nagin DS (1999) Modeling uncertainty in latent class membership: a case study in criminology. J Am Stat Asso 94:766–776Google Scholar
  64. Rubin DB (1987) Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. J. Wiley & Sons, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sampson R, Laub J (2003) Life-course desisters? Trajectories of crime among delinquent boys followed to age 70. Criminology 41:555–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Sampson RJ, Laub J (2005) Seductions of methods: rejoinder to Nagin & Tremblay’s developmental trajectory groups: fact or fiction? Criminology 43:905–914CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sampson RJ, Laub J, Eggleston EP (2004) On the robustness and validity of groups. J Quant Criminol 20:37–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Schaeffer CM, Petras H, Ialongo N, Masyn KE, Hubbard S, Poduska J, Kellam S (2006) A comparison of girls’ and boys’ aggressive-disruptive behavior trajectories across elementary school: prediction to young adult antisocial outcomes. J Consult Clin Psychol 74:500–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Shaw DS, Gilliom M, Ingoldsby EM, Nagin DS (2003) Trajectories leading to school-age conduct problems. Dev Psychol 39:189–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Schafer JL (1997) Analysis of incomplete multivariate data. Chapman & Hall, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schwarz G (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat 6:461–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Singer JD, Willett JB (2003) Applied longitudinal data analysis. Oxford University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Stram DO, Lee JW (1994) Variance components testing in the longitudinal mixed effects model. Biometrics 40: 961–971Google Scholar
  74. Thorndike RL (1953) Who belong in the family? Psychometrika 18(4):267–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. van Dulmen MHM, Goncy E, Vest A, Flannery DJ (2009) Group based trajectory modeling of externalizing behavior problems from childhood through adulthood: exploring discrepancies in empirical findings. In: Savage J (ed) The development of persistent criminality. Oxford University Press, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  76. Vermunt JK, Magidson J (2002) Latent class cluster analysis. In: Hagenaars JA, McCutcheon AL (eds) Applied latent class analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 89–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Vermunt JK, Magidson J (2005) Technical guide for latent GOLD 4.0: basic and advanced. Statistical Innovations Inc, Belmont MAGoogle Scholar
  78. Wang C-P, Brown CH, Bandeen-Roche K (2005) Residual diagnostics for growth mixture models: examining the impact of a preventive intervention on multiple trajectories of aggressive behavior. J Am Stat Assoc 100(3):1054–1076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wardrop JL (1989) Review of the California achievement tests, forms E and F. In: Close Conoley, J Kramer J (eds) The tenth mental measurements yearbook, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, pp 128–133Google Scholar
  80. Werthamer-Larsson L, Kellam SG, Wheeler L (1991) Effect of first-grade classroom environment on child shy behavior, aggressive behavior, and concentration problems. Am J Community Psychol 19:585–602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Willett JB, Sayer AG (1994) Using covariance structure analysis to detect correlates and predictors of individual change over time. Psychol Bull 116:363–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Yoshikawa H (1994) Prevention as cumulative protection: effects of early family support and education on chronic delinquency and its risks. Psychol Bull 115:28–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hanno Petras
    • 1
  • Katherine Masyn
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Criminology and Criminal JusticeUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Human and Community DevelopmentUniversity of California DavisDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations