Look Before You Analyze: Visualizing Data in Criminal Justice

  • Michael D. Maltz


Criminal justice data are hardly ever linear, normal, and/or independent, but most statistical techniques rely on the assumptions of linearity, normality and/or independence. Moreover, since the data are often entered by hand, they are prone to error. Plotting the data permits the analyst to determine the extent to which the assumptions are valid and to catch obvious errors in data entry. Moreover, while standard statistical techniques are useful in testing hypotheses, visualization allows the data to tell its story and thus is useful in generating hypotheses. This chapter provides some examples of how visualizing criminal justice data contributes to a fuller understanding of the processes that produced the data.


Police Department Crime Data Criminal Network True Zero Crime Count 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



Over the years my research has been supported by the National Institute of Justice, the Bureau of Justice Statistics, the Ohio Office of Criminal Justice Services, the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, and the American Statistical Association, which I acknowledge with gratitude. I am indebted to Andrew Gelman and Howard Wainer for their comments on earlier versions.


  1. Arbuthnot J (1710) An argument for divine providence taken from the constant regularity in the births of both sexes. Phil Trans R Soc 27:186–190Google Scholar
  2. Chernoff H (1973) The use of faces to represent points in k-dimensional space graphically. J Am Stat Assoc 68:342, 361–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cleveland WS (1993) Visualizing data. Hobart Press, Summit, NJGoogle Scholar
  4. Cleveland WS (1994) The elements of graphing data. Hobart Press, Summit, NJGoogle Scholar
  5. Cohen J (1994) The earth is round ({ p} < . 05). Am Psychol 49: 12, 997–1003Google Scholar
  6. Fox JA (2008) Uniform crime reports [United States]: supplementary homicide reports with multiple imputation, cumulative files 1976–2005 [computer file]. ICPSR22161-v1. Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [producer and distributor], Ann Arbor, MI, May 12, 2008Google Scholar
  7. Francis B, Pritchard J (1998) Bertin, Lexis and the graphical representation of event histories. Bull Comite Francais de Cartographie 156:80–87Google Scholar
  8. Francis B, Pritchard J (2000) Visualisation of criminal careers. In: Erbacher RF, Chen PC, Roberts JC, Wittenbrink CM (eds) Visual data exploration and analysis VII. Proceedings of the Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE), vol 3960, 96–105Google Scholar
  9. Freedman DA (1985) Statistics and the scientific method. In: Mason WM, Fienberg SE (eds) Cohort analysis in the social sciences: beyond the identification problem. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Geertz C (2005). Thick description: toward an interpretive theory of culture, Chap 1. In Geertz C (1973) The interpretation of cultures: selected essays. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Gelman A (2004) Exploratory data analysis for complex models (with discussion). J Comput Graph Stat 13(4): 755–779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gelman A, Hill J (2007) Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. Gelman A, Pasarica C, Dodhia R (2002) Let’s practice what we preach: turning tables into graphs. Am Stat 56: 121–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harmon RJ, Gliner JA, Morgan GA, Leech NL (2001) Problems with null hypothesis significance testing. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 40(2):250–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ianni FAJ, Reuss-Ianni E (1972) A family business: kinship and social control in organized crime. Russell Sage Foundation, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Lieberson S (1985) Making it count: the improvement of social research and theory. University of California Press, Berkeley, CAGoogle Scholar
  17. Loftus GR (1993) A picture is worth a thousand p values: on the irrelevance of hypothesis testing in the microcomputer age. Behav Res Meth Ins C 25(2): 250–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Maltz MD (1994) Deviating from the mean: the declining significance of significance. J Res Crime Delinq 31(4): 434–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Maltz MD (1996) Criminality in space and time: life course analysis and the micro-ecology of crime. In: Eck J, Weisburd D (eds) Crime and place. Criminal Justice Press, Monsey, NYGoogle Scholar
  20. Maltz MD (1998) Visualizing homicide: a research note. J Quant Criminol 14(4):397–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Maltz MD (1999) Bridging gaps in police crime data, a discussion paper from the BJS Fellows Program. Bureau of Justice Statistics Report No. NCJ-1176365. Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, September, 1999, 72 pp http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/bgpcd.pdf
  22. Maltz MD (2006) Some p-baked thoughts ({ p} > 0. 5) on experiments and statistical significance. J Exp Criminol 1(2):211–226Google Scholar
  23. Maltz MD (2008) Waves, particles, and crime. In: Bernasco W, Bruinsma G, Weisburd D (eds) Units of analysis in the study of the geography of crime. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Maltz MD, Gordon AC, Friedman W (1991) Mapping crime in its community setting: event geography analysis. Springer, New York. Internet version published in 2000; http://www.uic.edu/depts/lib/forr/
  25. Maltz MD, Mullany J (2000) Visualizing lives: new pathways for analyzing life course histories. J Quant Criminol 16(2):255–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Maltz MD, Weiss HE (2006) Creating a UCR utility, final report to the National Institute of Justice. Criminal Justice Research Center and Department of Sociology, The Ohio State University, February 23, 2006Google Scholar
  27. Maltz MD, Weiss HE (2007) Analysis of FBI-collected arrest data, final report to the Bureau of Justice Statistics. Criminal Justice Research Center and Department of Sociology, The Ohio State University, December 31, 2007Google Scholar
  28. Maltz MD, Zawitz MW (1998) Displaying violent crime trends using estimates from the National Crime Victimization Survey. Bureau of Justice Statistics Technical Report. No. NCJ 167881. Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/dvctue.pdf
  29. Memon N, Larsen HL (2006) Investigative data mining toolkit: a software prototype for visualizing, analyzing and destabilizing terrorist networks. In: Visualising network information. Meeting Proceedings RTO-MP-IST-063, Paper 14. RTO, Neuilly-sur-Seine, France, pp 14-1–14-24. ftp://ftp.rta.nato.int/PubFullText/RTO/MP/RTO-MP-IST-063/MP-IST-063--14.pdf
  30. Morselli C (2005) Contacts, opportunity, and criminal enterprise. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, OntarioGoogle Scholar
  31. Morselli C (2008) Inside criminal networks. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Morton S (2009) ASA president delivers NC State commencement speech. AMSTAT News July 2009, p 13Google Scholar
  33. Payne D, Maltz MD, Peterson R, Krivo L (2007) Domestic violence in in Ohio 2004, a report to the State of Ohio’s Office of Criminal Justice Services, Criminal Justice Research Center, The Ohio State University, March 5, 2007 http://www.ocjs.ohio.gov/research/Final%20OIBRS%20Report%203–26–07.pdf
  34. Rall T (2008) How deterrence works. January 7, 2008. { ©} 2008 Ted Rall, Distributed by Universal Press Syndicate, Kansas City, MOGoogle Scholar
  35. Reiss AJ Jr (1986) Co-offending influences on criminal careers. In: Blumstein A, Cohen J, Roth JA, Visher CA (eds) Criminal Careers and career criminals, vol 2. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, pp 121–160Google Scholar
  36. Reiss AJ Jr (1988) Co-offending and criminal careers. In: Tonry M, Morris N (eds) Crime and justice: a review of research, vol 10. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  37. Reiss AJ Jr, Farrington DP (1991) Advancing knowledge about co-offending: results from a prospective survey of London males. J Crim Law Criminol 82:360–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Stamp J (1929) Some economic factors in modern life. P. S. King, London, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  39. Theus M, Urbanek S (2008) Interactive graphics for data analysis: principles and examples. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FLGoogle Scholar
  40. Tufte ER (1983) The visual display of quantitative information. Graphics Press, Cheshire, CTGoogle Scholar
  41. Tukey JW (1977) Exploratory data analysis. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MAGoogle Scholar
  42. Unwin A, Theus M, Hofmann H (2006) Graphics of large datasets: visualizing a million. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. Vaupel JW, Zhenglian W, Andreev KF, Yashin AI (1998) Population data at a glance: shaded contour maps of demographic surfaces over age and time. Odense University Press, Odense, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  44. Wainer H (1983) On multivariate display. In: Rizvi MH, Rustagi JS, Siegmund D (eds) Recent advances in statistics. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  45. Wainer H (1997) Visual revelations: graphical tales of fate and deception from Napoleon Bonaparte to Ross Perot. Copernicus (Springer-Verlag), New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. Wainer H (2005) Graphic discovery: a trout in the milk and other visual adventures. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  47. Wainer H (2009) Picturing the uncertain world: how to understand, communicate and control uncertainty through graphical display. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  48. Wainer H, Spence I (2005) The commercial and political atlas and statistical breviary, by William Playfair (1801), 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  49. Wilkinson L (1999) The grammar of graphics. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  50. Wilkinson L, the Task Force on Statistical Inference (1999) Statistical methods in psychology journals: guidelines and explanations. Am Psychol 54(8):594–604Google Scholar
  51. Xu J, Chen H (2005) Criminal network analysis and visualization. Commun ACM 48(6):100–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zimring FE (1981) Kids, groups and crime: some implications of a well-known secret. J Crim Law Criminol 72: 867–885CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael D. Maltz
    • 1
  1. 1.Criminal Justice Research CenterOhio State UniversityColumbusUSA

Personalised recommendations