Control of Imprinting at the Gnas Cluster

  • Jo Peters
  • Christine M. Williamson
Part of the Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology book series (AEMB, volume 626)


Genomic imprinting is a form of epigenetic regulation in mammals whereby a small subset of genes is silenced according to parental origin. Early work had indicated regions of the genome that were likely to contain imprinted genes. Distal mouse chromosome 2 is one such region and is associated with devastating but ostensibly opposite phenotypes when exclusively maternally or paternally derived. Misexpression of proteins encoded at the Gnas complex, which is located within the region, can largely account for the imprinting phenotypes. Gnas is a complex locus with extraordinary transcriptional and regulatory complexity. It gives rise to alternatively spliced isoforms that show maternal-, paternal- and biallelic expression as well as a noncoding antisense transcript. The objective of our work at Harwell is to unravel mechanisms controllings the expression of these transcripts. We have performed targeted deletion analysis to test candidate regulatory regions within the Gnas complex and, unlike other imprinted domains, two major control regions have been identified. One controls the imprinted expression of a single transcript and is subsidiary to and must interact with, a principal control region that affects the expression of all transcripts. This principal region contains the promoter for the antisense transcript, expression of which may have a major role in controlling imprinting at the Gnas cluster.


Imprint Gene Paternal Allele Imprint Control Region Paternal Inheritance Gnas Gene 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Cattanach BM, Kirk M. Differential activity of maternally and paternally derived chromosome regions in mice. Nature 1985; 315:496–498.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cattanach BM, Evans EP, Burtenshaw MD et al. Further delimitation of the distal chromosome 2 imprinting region. Mouse Genome 1992; 90:82.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Peters J, Beechey CV, Ball ST et al. Mapping studies of the distal imprinting region of mouse chromosome 2. Genet Res 1994; 63:169–174.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Williamson CM, Schofield J, Dutton ER et al. Glomerular-specific imprinting of the mouse Gsα gene: how does this relate to hormone resistance in Albright’s hereditary osteodystrophy. Genomics 1996; 36:280–287.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Davies SJ, Hughes HE. Imprinting in Albright’s hereditary osteodystrophy. J Med Genet 1993; 30:101–103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yu S, Yu D, Lee E et al. Variable and tissue-specific hormone resistance in heterotrimeric G protein α-subunit (Gsα) knockout mice is due to tissue-specific imprinting of the Gsα gene. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 1998; 95:8715–8720.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Peters J, Holmes R, Monk D et al. Imprinting control within the compact Gnas locus. Cytogenet Genome Res 2006; 113:194–201.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bastepe M, Fröhlich LF, Hendy GN et al. Autosomal dominant pseudohypoparathyroidism type 1b is associated with a heterozygous microdeletion that likely disrupts a putative imprinting control element of GNAS. J Clin Invest 2003; 112:1255–1263.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Linglart A, Gensure RC, Olney RC et al. A novel STX16 deletion in autosomal dominant pseudohy-poparathyroidism type 1b redefines the boundaries of a cis-acting imprinting control element of GNAS. Am J Hum Genet 2005; 76:804–814PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Peters J, Wroe SF, Wells CA et al. A cluster of oppositely imprinted transcripts at the Gnas locus in the distal imprinting region of mouse chromosome 2. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 1999; 96:3830–3835.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kelsey G, Bodle D, Miller HJ et al. Identification of imprinted loci by methylation-sensitive representational difference analysis: Application to mouse distal Chromosome 2. Genomics 1999; 62:129–138.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Liu J, Yu S, Litman D et al. Identification of a methylation imprint mark within the mouse Gnas locus. Mol Cell Biol 2000; 20:5808–5817.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Williamson CM, Ball ST, Nottingham WT et al. A cis-acting control region is required exclusively for the tissue-specific imprinting of Gnas. Nat Genet 2004; 36:894–899.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Holmes R, Williamson C, Peters J et al. A comprehensive transcript map of the mouse Gnas imprinted complex. Genome Res 2003; 13:1410–1415.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wroe SF, Kelsey G, Skinner JA et al. An imprinted transcript, antisense to Nesp, adds complexity to the cluster of imprinted genes at the mouse Gnas locus. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 2000; 97:3342–3346.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Li T, Vu TH, Zeng Z-L et al. Tissue-specific expression of antisense and sense transcripts at the imprinted Gnas locus. Genomics 2000; 69:295–304.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Williamson CM, Skinner JA, Kelsey G et al. Alternative noncoding splice variants of Nespas, an imprinted gene antisense to Nesp in the Gnas imprinting cluster. Mamm Genome 2002; 13:74–79.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Abramowitz J, Grenet D, Birnbaumer M et al. XLαs, the extra-long form of the α-subunit of the Gs G protein, is significantly longer than suspected and so is its companion Alex. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 2004; 101:8366–8371.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Royo H, Bortolin M-L, Seitz H et al. Small noncoding RNAs and genomic imprinting. Cytogenet Genome Res 2006; 113:99–108.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Coombes C, Arnaud P, Gordon E et al. Epigenetic properties and identification of an imprint mark in the Nesp-Gnasxl domain of the mouse Gnas imprinted locus. Mol Cell Biol 2003; 23:5475–5488.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Crawford AJ, Mutchler KJ, Sullivan BE et al. Neural expression of a novel alternatively spliced and polyadenylated Gsα transcript. J Biol Chem 1993; 268:9879–9885.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kehlenbach RH, Matthey J, Huttner WB. XLαs is a new type of G protein. Nature 1994; 372:804–809.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Klemke M, Pasolli HA, Kehlenbach RH et al. Characterization of the extra-large G protein alpha-subunit XLαs II. Signal transduction properties. J Biol Chem 2000; 275:33633–33640.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bastepe M, Gunes Y, Perez-Villamil B et al. Receptor-mediated adenylyl cyclase activation through XLαs, the extra-large variant of the stimulatory G protein α-subunit. Mol Endocrinol 2002; 16:1912–1919.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Pasolli HA, Klemke M, Kehlenbach RH et al. Characterization of the extra-large G protein α-subunit XLαs. I. Tissue distribution and subcellular localization. J Biol Chem 2000; 275:33622–33632.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Plagge A, Gordon E, Dean W et al. The imprinted signaling protein XLαs is required for postnatal adaptation to feeding. Nat Genet 2004; 36:818–826.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Klemke M, Kehlenbach RH, Huttner WB. Two overlapping reading frames in a single exon encode interacting proteins—a novel way of gene usage. EMBO J 2001; 20:3849–3860.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ischia R, Lovisetti-Scamihorn P, Hogue-Angeletti R et al. Molecular cloning and characterisation of NESP55, a novel chromogranin-like precursor of a peptide with 5-HT1B receptor antagonist activity. J Biol Chem 1997; 272:11657–11662.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Plagge A, Isles AR, Gordon E et al. Imprinted nesp55 influences behavioral reactivity to novel environments. Mol Cell Biol 2005; 25:3019–3026.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bauer R, Weiss C, Marksteiner J et al. The new chromogranin-like protein NESP55 is preferentially localized in adrenaline-synthesizing cells of the bovine and renal medulla. Neurosci Lett 1999; 263:13–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Williamson CM, Turner MD, Ball ST et al. Identification of an imprinting control region affecting the expression of all transcripts in the Gnas cluster. Nat Genet 2006; 38:350–355.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cattanach BM, Peters J, Ball S et al. Two imprinted gene mutations: three phenotypes. Hum Mol Genet 2000; 9:2263–2273.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Chen M, Gavrilova O, Liu J et al. Alternative Gnas gene products have opposite effects on glucose and lipid metabolism. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 2005; 102:7386–7391.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Germain-Lee EL, Schwindinger W, Crane JL et al. A mouse model of Albright hereditary osteodystrophy generated by targeted disruption of exon 1 of the Gnas gene. Endocrinology 2005; 146:4697–4709.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Yu S, Gavrilova O, Chen H et al. Paternal versus maternal transmission of a stimulator G-protein α-subunit knockout produces opposite effects on energy metabolism. J Clin Invest 2000; 105:615–623.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Skinner JA, Cattanach BM, Peters J. The imprinted oedematous-small mutation on mouse chromosome 2 identifies new roles for Gnas and Gnasxl in development. Genomics 2002; 80:373–375.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Xie T, Plagge A, Gavrilova O et al. The alternative stimulatory G protein α-subunit XLαs is a critical regulator of energy and glucose metabolism and sympathetic nerve activity in adult mice. J Biol Chem 2006; 281:18989–18999.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wilkins JF, Haig D. What good is genomic imprinting: the function of parent-specific gene expression. Nature 2003; 4:1–10.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lewis A, Reik W. How imprinting centres work. Cytogenet Genome Res 2006; 113:81–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Spahn L, Barlow DP. An ICE pattern crystallizes. Nat Genet 2003; 35(1):11–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Sakamoto A, Liu J, Greene A et al. Tissue-specific imprinting of the G protein Gsα is associated with tissue-specific differences in histone methylation. Hum Mol Genet 2004; 13:819–828.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Choo JJ, Kim JD, Chung JH et al. Allele-specific deposition of macroH2A1 in imprinting control regions. Hum Mol Genet 2006; 15:717–724.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kim JD, Hinz AK, Bergmann A et al. Identification of clustered YY1 binding sites in imprinting control regions. Genome Res 2006; 16:901–911.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Bastepe M, Fröhlich LF, Linglart A et al. Deletion of the NESP55 differentially methylated region causes loss of maternal GNAS imprints and pseudohypoparathyroidism type Ib. Nat Genet 2005; 37:25–27.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Bastepe M. (This volume)Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Liu J, Nealon JG, Weinstein LS. Distinct patterns of abnormal GNAS imprinting in familial and sporadic pseudohypoparathyroidism type 1B. Hum Mol Genet 2005; 14:95–102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Liu J, Chen M, Deng C et al. Identification of the control region for tissue-specific imprinting of the stimulatory G protein α-subunit. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 2005; 102:5513–5518.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Williamson CM, Turner MD, Ball ST et al. Identification of an imprinting control region affecting the expression of all transcripts in the Gnas cluster. Nat Genet 2006; 38:350–355.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Lopes S, Lewis A, Hajkova P et al. Epigenetic modifications in an imprinting cluster are controlled by a hierarchy of DMRs suggesting long-range chromatin interactions. Hum Mol Genet 2003; 12:295–305.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Murrell A, Heeson S, Reik W. Interaction between differentially methylated regions partitions the imprinted genes Igf2 and H19 into parent-specific chromatin loops. Nat Genet 2004; 36:889–893.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Lyle R, Watanabe D, Vruchte D et al. The imprinted antisense RNA at the Igf2r locus overlaps but does not imprint Mas1. Nat Genet 2000; 25:19–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Mitsuya K, Meguro M, Lee MP et al. LIT1, an imprinted antisense RNA in the human KvLQT1 locus identified by screening for differentially expressed transcripts using monochromosomal hybrids. Hum Mol Genet 1999; 8:1209–1217.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Rougeulle C, Cardoso C, Fontés M et al. An imprinted antisense RNA overlaps UBE3A and a second maternally expressed transcript. Nat Genet 1998; 19:15–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Wutz A, Smrzka OW, Schweifer N et al. Imprinted expression of the Igf2r gene depends on an intronic CpG island. Nature 1997; 389745–749.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Fitzpatrick GV, Soloway PD, Higgins MJ. Regional loss of imprinting and growth deficiency in mice with a targeted deletion, of KvDMR1. Nat Genet 2002; 32:426–431.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Sleutels F, Zwart R, Barlow DP. The noncoding Air RNA is required for silencing autosomal imprinted genes. Nature 2002; 415:810–813.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Mancini-DiNardo D, Steele SJS, Levorse JM et al. Elongation of the Kcnqlot1 transcript is required for genomic imprinting on neighboring genes. Genes Dev 2006; 20:1268–1282.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Weinstein LS, Yu S, Warner DR et al. Endocrine manifestations of stimulatory G protein α-subunit mutations and the role of genomic imprinting. Endocrine Reviews 2001; 22:675–705.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Landes Bioscience and Springer Science+Business Media 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.MRC Mammalian Genetics UnitHarwellUK

Personalised recommendations