Rosaceae: Taxonomy, Economic Importance, Genomics

Part of the Plant Genetics and Genomics: Crops and Models book series (PGG, volume 6)

The magnificent simplicity, or to some, the monotonous consistency, of the actiniomorphicflowers of the rose family has been recognized for millennia. The originof the name rose is summarized in the American Heritage Dictionary (2000):


Sweet Cherry Sour Cherry Black Cherry Black Raspberry European Pear 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Adanson, M. 1763. Familles des plantes. Google Scholar
  2. Adanson, M. 1963. The Bicentennial of Michel Adanson’s “Familles des plantes.” George H. M. Lawrence (ed.). Part 1. xii, 392 pp.Google Scholar
  3. American Heritage Dictionary. 2000. The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 4th ed. Houghton Mifflin Co.Google Scholar
  4. Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. 1998. Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG I Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 85:531−553.Google Scholar
  5. Angiosperm Phylogeny Group. 2003. An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 141: 399−436.Google Scholar
  6. Aŕus, P., T. Yamamoto, E. Dirlewanter, and A. Abbott. 2006. Synteny in the Rosaceae. Plant Breed. Rev. 27: 175−211.Google Scholar
  7. AWP. 2007. Angiosperm Phylogeny Website. Version 7, May 2006. managed by Stevens, P. F. Accessed 22 June 2007.
  8. Challice J. S. 1974. Rosaceae chemotaxonomy and the origins of the Pomoideae. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 69:239−259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Challice J. S. 1981. Chemotaxonomic studies in the Rosaceae and the evolutionary origins of the subfamily Maloideae. Preslia 53:289–304.Google Scholar
  10. Crepet, W. L., E. M. Friis, and M. A. Gandolfo. 2004. Fossil evidence and phylogeny: The age of major angiosperm clades based on mesofossil and macrofossil evidence from Cretaceous deposits. American J. Bot. 91: 1666–1682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cronquist. A. 1981. An integrated System of Classification of Flowering Plants. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Dahlgren, R. M. T. 1980. A revised system of classification of the angiosperms. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 80:91–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dickinson, T. A, R. C. Evans, and C. S. Campbell. 2002. Rosaceae classification and phylogeny: introduction and overview. Botany 2002.Google Scholar
  14. Dirlewanger, E., E. Graziano, T. Joobeur, F. Garriga-Caldeŕe, P. Cosson, W. Howad, and P. Aŕus. 2004. Comparative mapping and marker-assisted selection in Rosaceae fruit crops. PNAS.
  15. GRIN, 2007. USDA, ARS, National Genetic Resources Program. Germplasm Resources Information Network – (GRIN) [Online Database]. National Germplasm Resources Laboratory, Beltsville, Maryland. URL: (30 April 2007).
  16. Heywood, V. H. 2007 Flowering plants of the world. Mayflower Books. Elsavier Publisher, New York, NY. pp. 141–144.Google Scholar
  17. Hutchinson, J. 1964. The genera of flowering plants. Vol 1. Dicotyledons. Clarendon, Oxford.Google Scholar
  18. Janick, J. 2005.The origins of fruits, fruit growing, and fruit breeding. Plant Breed. Rev. 25:255–320.Google Scholar
  19. Judd, W. S., C. S. Campbell, E. A. Kellogg, and P. F. Stevens. 1999. Plant Systematics: A phylogenetic approach. Sinauer Associates, Inc. Sunderland, MA. 290–306.Google Scholar
  20. Jussieu, Antoine Laurent de. 1789. Genera plantarum.Google Scholar
  21. Linneaus, C. 1735. Systema Natural.Google Scholar
  22. Mabberley, D. J. 1987. The Plant-Book. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, U.K. pp. 506–507.Google Scholar
  23. Morgan, D. R., D.E. Soltis, K. R. Robertson. 1994. Systematic and evolutionary implications of rbcL sequence variation in rosaceae. Am. J. Bot. 81: 890–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Soltis, D. E., P. S. Soltis, P. K. Endress, M.W. Chase. 2005. Phylogeny and Evolution of Angiosperms. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts. pp. 237–248.Google Scholar
  25. Takhtajan, A. 1997. Diversity and Classification of Flowering Plants. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  26. Thorne, R. F. 1992. Classification and geography of flowering plants. Bot. Rev. 58: 225–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Thorne, R. F. 2000. The classification and geography of the flowering plants: dicotyledons of the class Angiospermae. Bot. Rev. 66: 441–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vamosi, J. C. and T. A. Dickinson. 2006. Polyploidy and diversification: A phylogenetic investigation in rosaceae. Int. J. Plant Sci. 167: 349–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wikström, N., V. Savolainen, and M. W. Chase. 2001. Evolution of the angiosperms: Calibrating the family tree. Proc. Roy. Soc. London B, 268: 2211–2220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.U. S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research ServiceNational Clonal Germplasm RepositoryCorvallisUSA
  2. 2.Department of Horticulture and Landscape ArchitecturePurdue UniversityWest LafayetteUSA

Personalised recommendations