Skip to main content

Distortion Risk Measures in Portfolio Optimization

  • Chapter
Handbook of Portfolio Construction

Abstract

Distortion risk measures are perspective risk measures because they allow an asset manager to reflect a client’s attitude toward risk by choosing the appropriate distortion function. In this paper, the idea of asymmetry was applied to the standard construction of distortion risk measures. The new asymmetric distortion risk measures are derived based on the quadratic distortion function with different risk-averse parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Acerbi C., 2002, Spectral measures of risk: a coherent representation of subjective risk aversion, Journal of Banking and Finance 26, 1505–1518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acerbi C. and Tasche D., 2004, On the coherence of expected shortfall, Journal of Banking and Finance 26, 1487–1503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adam A., Houkari M. and Laurent J., 2007, Spectral Risk Measures and Portfolio Selection, http://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/docs/00/16/56/41/PDF/Adam-Houkari-Laurent-ISFA-WP2037.pdf .

  • Albrecht P., 2004, Risk measures, in Encyclopedia of Actuarial Science, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Artzner P., Delbaen F., Eber J.M. and Heath D., 1999, Coherent measures of risk, Mathematical Finance 9, 203–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balbas A., Garrido J. and Mayoral S., 2007, Properties of Distortion Risk Measures, available at http://www.gloriamundi.org/picsresources/bgm_pdr.pdf .

  • Balzer L., 2001, Investment risk: a unified approach to upside and downside returns, in Managing DownsideRisk in Financial Markets: Theory, Practice and Implementation, eds. Sortino F. and Satchell S., 103–105. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bäuerle N. and Müller A., 2006, Stochastic orders and risk measures: consistency and bounds, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 38(1), 132–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellini F. and Caperdoni C., 2006, Coherent distortion risk measures and higher order stochastic dominances, preprint, January 2006, available at http://www.gloriamundi.org .

  • Chekhlov A., Uryasev S. and Zabarankin M., 2003, Portfolio optimization with Drawdown constraints, Implemented in Portfolio Safeguard by AORDA.com, Theory Probability Application 44(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • De Giorgi E., 2005, Reward-risk portfolio selection and stochastic dominance, Journal of Banking and Finance 29(4), 895–926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denneberg D., 1990, Distorted probabilities and insurance premiums, Methods of Operations Research 63, 3–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denneberg D., 1994, Non-Additive Measures and Integrals. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denuit M., Dhaene J., Goovaerts M. and Kaas R., 2005, Actuarial Theory for Dependent Risks: Measures, Orders and Models. Chichester: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Denuit M., Dhaene J., Goovaerts M., Kaas R. and Laeven R., 2006, Risk measurement with equivalent utility principles, Statistics and Decision 24, 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhaene J. and Goovaerts M., 1996, Dependency of risks and stop-loss order, Astin Bulletin 26(2), 201–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhaene J., Denuit M., Goovaerts M., Kaas R. and Vyncke D., 2002a, The concept of comonotonicity in actuarial science and finance: theory, Mathematics and Economics 31, 3–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhaene J., Denuit M., Goovaerts M., Kaas R. and Vyncke D., 2002b, The concept of comonotonicity in actuarial science and finance: applications, Mathematics and Economics 31, 133–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dhaene J., Goovaerts M. and Kaas R., 2003, Economic capital allocation derived from risk measures, North American Actuarial Journal 7(2), 44–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebert U., 2005, Measures of downside risk, Economics Bulletin, Economics Bulletin 4(16), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Embrechts P., McNeal A. and Straumann D., 2002, Correlation and dependence in risk management: properties and pitfalls, in Risk Management: Value at Risk and Beyond, ed. Dempste M.A.H., 176–223. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabozzi F. and Tunaru R., 2008, Pricing Models for Real Estate Derivatives, Yale Working paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Föllmer H. and Schied, A., 2002a, Convex measures of risk and trading constraints, Finance and Stochastics 6(4), 429–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Föllmer H. and Schied, A., 2002b, Robust preferences and convex measures of risk, in Advances in Finance and Stochastics, eds. Sandmann K. and Schonbucher P. J., 39–56. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frittelli M. and Rosazza Gianin E., 2005, Law invariant convex risk measures, Advances in Finance and Stochastics 7, 33–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaivoronski A. and Pflug G., 2005, Value at Risk in Portfolio Optimization: Properties and Computational Approach, Journal of Risk, 7, 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giacometti R. and Ortobelli S., 2004, Risk measures for asset allocation models, in Risk Measures for the 21st Century, ed. Szegö G., 69–87. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts M., De Vijlder F. and Haezendonck J., 1984, Insurance Premiums. Amsterdam: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts M., Kaas R., Dhaene J. and Qihe T., 2003, A unified approach to generate risk measures, Astin Bulletin 33, 173–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gourieroux C. and Liu W., 2006, Efficient portfolio analysis using distortion risk measures, Les Cahiers du CREF 06–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadar J. and Russell W., 1969, Rules for ordering uncertain prospects, American Economic Review 59, 25–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamada M., Sherris M. and van Der Hoek J., 2006, Dynamic portfolio allocation, the dual theory of choice and probability distortion function, Astin Bulletin 36(1), 187–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy M. and Wirch J., 2003, Ordering of risk measures for capital adequacy, in Proceedings of the AFIR Colloquim, Tromsoe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyde C., Kou S. and Peng X., 2006, What Is a Good Risk Measure: Bridging the Gaps Between Data, Coherent Risk Measure, and Insurance Risk Measure, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hürlimann W., 2004, Distortion risk measures and economic capital, North American Actuarial Journal 8(1), 86–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inoue A., 2003, On the worst conditional expectation, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 286, 237–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaas R., Van Heerwaarden A. and Goovaerts M., 1994, Ordering of actuarial risks, CAIRE Educations Series, Brussels.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaas R., Goovaerts M., Dhaene J. and Denuit M., 2001, Modern actuarial risk theory. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman D. and Tversky A., 1979, Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk, Econometrica 47, 313–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kusuoka E., 2001, Law invariant risk measures have the Fatou property, preprint, Universite Paris Dauphine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz H., 1952, Portfolio selection, Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortobelli S., 2001, The classification of parametric choices under uncertainty: analysis of the portfolio choice problem, Theory and Decision 51, 297–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortobelli S., Rachev S., Shalit H. and Fabozzi F., 2008, Risk Probability Functionals and Probability Metrics in Portfolio Theory, Probability and Mathematical Statistics, 28, 203–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen C. and Satchell S., 1998, An extended family of financial-risk measures, The Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance Theory 23, 89–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rachev R., Ortobelli S., Stoyanov S., Fabozzi F. and Biglova A., 2008, Desirable properties of an ideal risk measure in portfolio theory, International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riedel F., 2004, Dynamic coherent risk measures, Stochastic Processes and their Applications, 112, 185–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockafellar R., Uryasev S. and Zabarankin M., 2002, Deviation measures in generalized linear regression, Risk Management and Financial Lab.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockafellar R., Uryasev S. and Zabarankin M., 2003, Deviation measures in risk analysis and optimization, Risk Management and Financial Engineering Lab.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockafellar R., Uryasev S. and Zabarankin M., 2006, Generalized deviations in risk analysis, Finance and Stochastics 10(1), 51–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild M. and Stiglitz J., 1970, Increasing risk. I.a. definition, Journal of Economic Theory 2, 225–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmeidler D., 1986, Subjective probability and expected utility without additivity, Econometrica 57(3), 571–587.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone B., 1973, A general class of three-parameter risk measures, Journal of Finance 28, 675–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szegö G., 2004, On the (non)acceptance of innovations, in Risk Measures for the 21st Century, ed., Szegö G., 1–10. Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsanakas A. and Desli E., 2003, Risk measures and theories of choice, British Actuarial Journal 9, 959–981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Hoek J. and Sherris M., 2001, A class of non-expected utility risk measures and implications for asset allocation, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 28(1), 69–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang S., 2002, A risk measure that goes beyond coherence, 12th AFIR International Colloquium, Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang S., 2004, Cat bond pricing using probability transforms, Geneva Papers, Special issue on Insurance and the State of the Art in Cat Bond Pricing 278, 19–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang S., Young V. and Panjer H., 1997, Axiomatic characterization of insurance prices, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 21, 173–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wirch J. and Hardy M., 1999, A synthesis of risk measures for capital adequacy, Insurance: Mathematics and Economics 25, 337–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaari M., 1987, The dual theory of choice under risk, Econometrica 55, 95–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y. and Rachev S., 2006, Risk Attribution and Portfolio Performance Measurement: An Overview, Journal of Applied Functional Analysis, 4, 373–402.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Svetozar T. Rachev .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sereda, E.N., Bronshtein, E.M., Rachev, S.T., Fabozzi, F.J., Sun, W., Stoyanov, S.V. (2010). Distortion Risk Measures in Portfolio Optimization. In: Guerard, J.B. (eds) Handbook of Portfolio Construction. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77439-8_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics