Physiology of Sensory Perception

  • Carolyn F. Ross


Olfactory Bulb Sensory Evaluation Olfactory Receptor Olfactory Epithelium Sensory Perception 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Amerine, M.A., Pangborn, R.M. and Roessler, E.B. 1965. Principles of Sensory Evaluation of Food. Academic Press, New York. 602 pp.Google Scholar
  2. Amoore, J.E., Johnston, J.W. and Rubin, M. 1964. The stereochemical theory of odor. Sci. Am. 210: 42–49.Google Scholar
  3. Amoore, J.E. 1970. Molecular Basis of Odor. Charles C. Thomas Publishing Co., Springfield, IL. 236 pp.Google Scholar
  4. Amoore, J.E. and Forrester, L.J. 1976. The specific anosmia to trimethylamine: the fishy primary odor. J. Chem. Ecol. 2: 49–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amoore, J.E., Palmieri, G. and Wanke, E. 1967. Molecular shape and odor: Pattern analysis by PAPA. Nature. 216: 1084–1087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Amoore, J.E., Venstrom, D. and Davis, A.R. 1968. Enkephalin and substance P effects related to trigeminal pain. Percep. Motor Skills. 26: 143–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Axel, R. 1995. The molecular logic of smell. Sci. Am. 273: 154–159.Google Scholar
  8. Bartoshuk, L., Conner, E. and Grubin, D. 1993a. PROP supertasters and the perception of ethyl alcohol. Chem. Senses. 18: 526–531.Google Scholar
  9. Bartoshuk, L.M., Duffy, V.B. and Miller, I.J. 1993b. PROP tasting – anatomy, psychophysics and sex effects. Physio. Beh. 56: 1165–1171.Google Scholar
  10. Bartoshuk, L.M., Duffy, V.B., Lucchina, L.A., Prutkin, J. and Fast, K. 1998. PROP supertasters and the saltiness of NaCl. In: Olfaction and Taste XII. An International Symposium. C. Murphy (Editor). Annals. New York Acad. Sci., New York. 855, 793–796.Google Scholar
  11. Beets, M.G. 1978. Structure-activity relationships in human chemoreception. Applied Science, London. 408.Google Scholar
  12. Berodier, F., Lavanchy, P., Zannoni, M., Casals, J., Herrero, L. and Adamo, C. 1997. A guide to the sensory evaluation of smell, aroma and taste of hard and semi-hard cheeses. Lebensm. Wiss. Technol. 30: 653–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Best, C.H. and Taylor, M.B. 1943. The Physiological Basis of Medical Practice. Williams and Wilkins Co. Baltimore, MD. 35.Google Scholar
  14. Bodyfelt, F.W., Tobias J. and Trout G.M. 1988. The Sensory Evaluation of Dairy Products. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Brown, E.L. and Deffenbacher, K. 1979. Perception and the Senses. Oxford University Press. New York.Google Scholar
  16. Buck, L. and Axel, R. 1991. A novel multigene family may encode odorant receptors: a molecular basis for odor recognition. Cell. 65: 175–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bufe, B., Hofmann, T., Krautwurst, D., Raguse, J., and Meyerhof, W. 2002. The human TAS2R16 receptor mediates bitter taste in response to beta-glucopyranosides. Nat. Genet. 32: 397–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cardello, A.V. and Segars, R.A. 1989. Effects of sample size and prior mastication on texture judgments. J. Sens. Stud. 4: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Caul, J.F. 1957. The profile method of flavor analysis. Adv. Food Res. 7: 1.Google Scholar
  20. Delwiche, J. 1996. Are there ‘basic’ tastes? Trends Food Sci. Technol. 7: 411–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. DeVries, H. and Stuvier, M. 1961. The absolute sensitivity of the human sense of smell. In: Sensory Communication. W.A. Rosenblith (Editor). J. Wiley & Sons, New York, 159–167.Google Scholar
  22. Doty, R.L. 1991. Psychological measurement of odor perception in humans. In: The Human Sense of Smell.D.G. Laing, R.L. Doty and W. Breipohl (Editors). Springer, Berlin. 95–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Drayna, D., Coon, H., Kim, U.K., Elsner, T. and Cromser, K. 2003. Genetic analysis of a complex trait in Utah Genetic Reference Project: a major locus for PTC taste ability on chromosome 7q and a secondary locus on chromosome 16p. Hum. Genet. 112: 567–572.Google Scholar
  24. Drewnowski, A., Henderson, S., Shore, A. and Barratt-Fornell, A. 1998. Sensory Responses to 6-n-Propylthiouracil (PROP) or Sucrose Solutions and Food Preferences in Young Women. Annals New York Acad. Sci., New York. 797–801.Google Scholar
  25. Dudel, J. 1981. General sensory physiology, psychophysics. In: Fundamentals of Sensory Physiology. R.F. Schmidt (Editor). Springer-Verlag, New York. 1–30.Google Scholar
  26. Duffy, V., Miller, I.J. and Bartoshuk, L.M. 1994. 6-n-propylthiouracil (PROP) supertasters and women have greater number of fungiform papillae taste buds. Chem. Senses. 19: 465.Google Scholar
  27. Engen, T. 1982. The Perception of Odors. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  28. Green, B.G. 1993. Evidence that removal of capsaicin accelerates desensitization on the tongue. Neurosci. Lett. 150: 44–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Green, B.G. 1996. Chemesthesis: Pungency as a component of flavor. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 7: 415–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Harper, R. 1972. Human Senses in Action. Churchill Livingston, London.Google Scholar
  31. Hollingworth, H.L. and Poffenberger, A.T. 1917. The Sense of Taste. Moffat, Yard and Co., New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Huang, L., Shanker, Y., Dbuauskaite, J., Zheng, J. and Yan, W. 1999. Gg12 colocalizes with gustducin in taste receptor cells and mediates IP3 response to bitter denatonium. Nat. Neurosci. 2: 1055–1062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hyde, R.J. and Witherly, S.A. 1993. Dynamic contract: a sensory contribution to palatability. Appetite 21: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jones, D.T. and Reed, R. 1989. Golf: an olfactory neuron-specific G-protein involved in odorant sensory transduction. Science. 244: 790–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kaprio, J., Koskenvuo, M., Langinvainio, H., Romanov, K., Sarna, S., Rose, R. 1987. Genetics influences on use and abuse of alcohol: a study of 5638 adult Finnish twin brothers. Alcohol. Clin. Exp. Res. 11: 349–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Karrer, T. and Bartoshuk, L. 1995. Effects of capsaicin desensitization on taste in humans. Physiol. Behav. 57: 421–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kim, U.K., Breslin, P., Reed, D., Drayna, D. 2004. Genetics of human taste perception. J. Dental Res. 83: 448–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kim, U.K., Jorgenson, E., Coon, H., Leppert, M., Risch, N. and Drayna, D. 2003. Positional cloning of the human quantitative trait locus underlying taste sensitivity to phenylthiocarbamide. Science. 299: 1221–1225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Laing, D.G. 1983. Natural sniffing gives optimal odor perception for humans. Perception. 12: 99–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lawless, H.T. 1984. Oral chemical irritation: Psychological properties. Chem. Senses. 9: 72–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lawless, H.T., Antinone, M.J., Ledford, R.A. and Johnton, M. 1994. Olfactory responsiveness to diacetyl. J. Sens. Stud. 9: 47–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lawless, H.T. and Heymann, H. 1999. Sensory Evaluation of Food. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers. New York.Google Scholar
  43. Li, X., Staszewski, L., Xu, H., Durick, K., Zoller, M. and Adler, E. 2002. Human receptors for sweet and umami taste. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99: 4692–4696.Google Scholar
  44. Malnic, B., Hirono, J., Sato, T. and Buck, L.B. 1999. Combinatorial receptor codes for odors. Cell. 96: 713–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Maruniak, J.A. and Mackay-Sim, A. 1983. The sense of smell. In: Sensory Analysis of Foods. Piggott, J.R. (Editors). Elsevier Science Publishing Company, New York. 23–58.Google Scholar
  46. McDougall, D.B. 1983. Assessment of the appearance of food. In: Sensory Quality in Foods and Beverages: Its Definition, Measurement and Control.Williams, A.A. and Atkin, R.K. (Editors). Ellis Horwood, Chichester/Verlag Chemie, Deerfield Beach.Google Scholar
  47. MacDougall, D.B. 1984. Colour vision and appearance measurement. In: Sensory Analysis of Foods. Piggott, J.R. (Editor). Elsevier Science Publishing Company, New York. 93–116.Google Scholar
  48. Meilgaard, M.C. 1975. Flavor chemistry of beer. II. Flavor and threshold of 239 aroma volatiles. Tech. Q. Master Brew. Assoc. Am. 12: 151–168.Google Scholar
  49. Meilgaard, M., Civille, G. and Carr, B. 1999. Sensory Evaluation Techniques (3rd Edition). CRC Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Meilgaard, M., Civille, G. and Carr, B. 2007. Sensory Evaluation Techniques (4th Edition). CRC Press, New York.Google Scholar
  51. Miller, I.J. and Bartoshuk, L.M. 1991. Taste perception, taste bud distribution and spatial relationships. In: Smell and Taste in Health and Disease. T.V. Getchell, R.L. Doty, L.M. Bartoshuk and J.B. Snow (Editors). Raven, New York, 205–233.Google Scholar
  52. Mojet, J., Christ-Hazelhof, E. and Heidema, J. 2001. Taste perception with age: Generic or specific losses in threshold sensitivity to the five basic tastes? Chem. Senses. 26: 845–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Moncrieff, R.W. 1967. The Chemical Senses. Chemical Rubber Co. Press. Cleveland, OH.Google Scholar
  54. Murphy, C. 1986. Taste and smell in the elderly. In: Clinical Measurements of Taste and Smell. H.L. Meiselmann, and R.S. Rivlin (Editors). Macmillan, New York, 343–371.Google Scholar
  55. Noble, A.C., Arnold, R.A., Buechsenstein, J., Leach, E.J., Schmidt, J.O. and Stern, P.M. 1987. Modification of a standardized system of wine aroma terminology. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 38: 143–146.Google Scholar
  56. Ossebaard, C. and Smith, D. 1995. Effect of amiloride on the taste of NaCl, Na-gluconate and KCl in humans: implications for Na+ receptor mechanisms. Chem. Senses. 20: 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Piggott, J.R. 1984. Sensory Analysis of Foods. Elsevier Science Publishing Company, New York.Google Scholar
  58. Plattig, K.H. 1984. The sense of taste. In: Sensory Analysis of Foods. J.R. Piggott (Editors). Elsevier Science Publishing Company, New York. 1–22.Google Scholar
  59. Porubcan, A. and Vickers, Z. 2005. Characterizing milk aftertaste: The effects of salivation rate, PROP taster status, or small changes in acidity, fat or sucrose on acceptability of milk to milk dis-likers. Food Qual. Pref. 16: 608–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Poste, L.M., Mackie, D., Butler, G. and Larmond, E. 1991. Laboratory Methods for Sensory Analysis of Food. Agriculture Canada Publication. 9–13.Google Scholar
  61. Prescott, J. and Stevenson, R. 1995. Effects of oral chemical irritation on tastes and flavors in frequent and infrequent users of chili. Physiol. Behav. 58: 1117–1127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Richardson, N.J. and Booth, D.A. 1993. Multiple physical patterns in judgments of the creamy texture of milks and creams. Acta Psychol. 84: 92–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Rolls, B.A. and Drewnowski, A. 1996. Diet and nutrition. In: Encyclopedia of Gerontology. J.E. Birren, (Editor). Academic Press, San Diego, CA 1: 429–440.Google Scholar
  64. Schiffman, H.R. 1996. Sensation and Perception. An Integrated Approach (4th Edition). John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
  65. Schmidt, R.F. 1981. Somatovisceral sensibility. In: Fundamentals of Sensory Physiology. R. Schmidt (Editor). Springer-Verlag, New York. 81–125.Google Scholar
  66. Seymour, S.K. and Hamann, D.D. 1988. Crispness and crunchiness of selected low moisture foods. J. Texture Stud. 19: 79–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Silver, W.L. 1987. The common chemical sense. In: Neurobiology of Taste and Smell. T.E. Finger, and W.L. Silver (Editors). John Wiley & Sons. 65–87.Google Scholar
  68. Smith, D. and Margolskee, R. 2001. Making sense of taste. Sci. Am. 284: 32–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Stevens, D.A., Smith, R. and Lawless, H.T. 2006. Multidimensional scaling of ferrous sulfate and basic tastes. Physiol. Beh. 87: 272–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Szczesniak, A.S. 1963. Classification of textural characteristics. J. Food Sci. 28: 385–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Szczesniak, A.S. 1979. Recent development in solving consumer-oriented texture problems. Food Tech. 33: 61–66.Google Scholar
  72. Szczesniak, A.S. 1991. Textural perceptions and food quality. J. Food Qual. 14: 75–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Taylor, A.J. 2002. Release and transport of flavors in vivo: physicochemical, physiological and perceptual considerations. Comp. Rev. Food Sci. Food Safety. 1: 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Tyle, P. 1993. Effect of size, shape and hardness of particles in suspension on oral texture and palatability. Acta Psychologica. 84: 111–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Vickers, Z.M. 1985. The relationship of pitch, loudness and eating technique to judgments of the crispness and crunchiness of foods sounds. J. Texture Stud. 15: 85–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wilkinson, C., Dijksterhuis, G.B. and Minekus, M. 2000. From food structure to texture. Trends. Food Sci. Tech. 11: 442–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wright, R.H. 1954. Odour and molecular vibration. I. Quantum and thermodynamic considerations. J. Appl. Chem. 4: 611–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Yamaguchi, S. and Ninomiya, K. 2000. Umami and food palatability. J. Nutr. 130: 921S–926S.Google Scholar
  79. Young, J.M. and Trask, B.J. 2002. The sense of smell: Genomics of vertebrate odorant receptors. Hum. Mol. Genet. 11: 1153– 1160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Zhao, G.Q., Zhang, Y., Hoon, M., Chandrashekar, J., Erlenback, I. 2003. The receptors for mammalian sweet and umami taste. Cell. 115: 255–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carolyn F. Ross
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Food Science and Human NutritionWashington State UniversityWA

Personalised recommendations