Application of a DFμA Methodology to facilitate the assembly of a Micro/Nano Measurement Device

  • Carsten Tietje
  • Richard Leach
  • Michele Turitto
  • Ronaldo Ronaldo
  • Svetan Ratchev
Part of the IFIP — International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 260)


A lack of well defined Design for Microassembly (DFμA) methodologies to enable an increased transfer of prototypes from the research lab to production on industrial scale has been identified. The main benefit of such a methodology is the adaptation of the design by matching it with microassembly process characteristics. In addition there needs to be a push in metrology equipment to respond to the ongoing trend of miniaturisation, enabling quality assurance for three dimensional products with nanometer scale features. The presented paper addresses these two gaps by utilising a novel DFuA methodology to enable a state-of-the-art CMM stylus assembly, which is characterised by extremely rigid and challenging requirements. The design of the parts to be assembled is shown. Furthermore the selection of the most suitable assembly equipment is supported. Finally the actual assembly system is described and illustrated as proof of validation.


Assembly Process Assembly System National Physical Laboratory Throughput Time Stylus Design 


  1. 1.
    Rampersad, H.K., Integrated Simultaneous Design for Robotic Assembly. 1994, Chisester et al.: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hesselbach, J. and A. Raatz, eds. mikroPRO, Untersuchung zum internationalen Stand der Mikroproduktionstechnik. 2002, Vulkan: Essen.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Koelemeijer, S. and J. Jacot, Cost Efficient Assembly of Microsystems. mst-News, 1999. January: p. 30–33.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Unknown, Market Analysis for MEMS and Microsystems HI, 2005–2009. 2005: WTC — Wicht Technologie Consulting (on behalf of NEXUS Association).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dimov, S.S., et al. A roadmapping study in 4M Multi-Material Micro Manufacture. in 4M 2006 — SECOND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMATERIAL MICRO MANUFACTURE. 2006 A roadmapping study in 4M Multi-Material Micro Manufacture. Grenoble: Elsevier (Oxford).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Leach, R., et al., Advances in traceable nanometrology at the National Physical Laboratory. Nanotechnology, 2000. 12: p. R1–R6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tietje, C. and S. Ratchev. Design for Micro Assembly — A methodology for product design and process selection. in IEEE International Symposium on Assembly and Manufacturing (ISAM). 2007. Ann Arbor, USA: Omnipress.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Whitney, D.E., Mechanical Assemblies — Their Design, Manufacture, and Role in Product Development. 2004, New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Van Brussel, H., et al., Assembly of Microsystems. Annals of the CIRP, 2000. 49(2): p. 451–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Fearing, R. S. Survey of Sticking Effects for Micro-Parts. in IEEE International Conference for Robotics and Intelligent Systems IROS’ 95. 1995. Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ando, Y., H. Ogawa, and Y. Ishikawa. Estimation of attractive force between approached surfaces. in Second Int. Symp. on Micro Machine and Human Science. 1991. Nagoya, Japan.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Tichem, M., D. Lang, and B. Karpuschewski, A classification scheme for quantitative analysis of micro-grip principles. Assembly Automation, 2004. 24(1): p. 88–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pfeifer, T., et al., Quality control and process observation for the micro assembly process. Measurement. 30(1): p. 1–18.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Federation for Information Processing 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carsten Tietje
    • 1
  • Richard Leach
    • 2
  • Michele Turitto
    • 1
  • Ronaldo Ronaldo
    • 1
  • Svetan Ratchev
    • 1
  1. 1.Precision Manufacturing GroupThe University of NottinghamNottinghamUK
  2. 2.Industry & Innovation DivisionNational Physical LaboratoryTeddingtonUK

Personalised recommendations