Advertisement

Comparing Performance Measures for the Trade Off of Flow Time and Throughput in Complex Manufacturing Systems

  • M. Macchi
Part of the IFIP – The International Federation for Information Processing book series (IFIPAICT, volume 257)

Management of the trade off of logistic performances has always been a key issue in industry. The trade off results from the contrasting business objectives defined at strategic management level and is part of the subsequent decisions taken at shop floor level. Therein, performance measures influence decisions. These are, in general, operational measures and might be more or less aware of the trade off fixed at strategic level. The present paper aims to demonstrate how awareness may change in a production context where both flow time and throughput assumes a strategic importance. The demonstration is achieved by means of 2 case studies: the first one is simulated from scratch in laboratory, the second one is a simulation from a real industrial setting.

Keywords

Flow Time Flow Shop Penalty Cost Premium Price Strategic Level 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    De Ron, A. J. and Rooda, J. E. Equipment Effectiveness: OEE revisited. IEEE Transaction on Semiconductor Manufacturing, vol. 18, no. 1, 190–196, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    De Ron, A. J. and Rooda, J. E. Fab Performance. IEEE Transaction on Semiconductor Manufacturing, vol. 18, no. 3, 399–405, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hopp, W. and Spearman, M.L. Factory physics: foundation of manufacturing management. McGraw-Hill, Boston, 2000.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Huang, S. H., Dismukes, J. P., Shi, J., Su, Q., Razzak, M. A., Bodhale R. and Robinson, D.E. Manufacturing productivity improvement using effectiveness metrics and simulation analysis. International Journal of Production Research, vol.41, no.3, 513–527, 2003.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nakajima, S. Introduction to TPM Total Productive Maintenance. Productivity Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Norwalk, Connecticut, 1988.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    SEMI. Standard for definition and measurement of equipment productivity, SEMI E79–0200. Semiconductor Equipment and Material International, Mt. View, California, 2000.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    SEMI. Provisional guideline for definition and calculation of overall factory efficiency (OFE) and other associated factory-level productivity metrics. Technical Report SEMI E124, International SEMATECH, Inc, 2003.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Federation for Information Processing 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Macchi
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di Ingegneria GestionalePolitecnico di MilanoMilanoItaly

Personalised recommendations