Environmental problems can be viewed as a failure of cooperation: individual choices are seemingly made based on individual benefits, rather than benefits for all. The game-theoretic structure of these problems thus resembles commons dilemmas or similar multiplayer strategic choices, in which the incentives to eschew cooperation can lead to unfavorable outcomes for all the players. Such problems can sometimes be restructured by punishing noncooperators. However, cooperation can also be enhanced when individuals adopt intrinsic values, such as cooperation, as a result of social goals to affiliate with a group. We define a social goal as any goal to affiliate with a group, and also any goal that derives from any group affiliation.
We suggest that individual decision making in group contexts depends on a variety of different types of social goals, including conformity to group norms, sharing success, and carrying out group-role obligations. We present a classification of social goals and suggest how these goals might be used to understand individual and group behavior. In several lab- and field-based studies, we show how our classification of social goals can be used to structure observation and coding of group interactions. We present brief accounts of two laboratory experiments, one demonstrating the relationship between group affiliation and cooperation, the second exploring differences in goals that arise when a decision problem is considered by groups rather than individuals. We also sketch three field projects in which these ideas help to clarify processes involved in decisions based on seasonal climate information.
Identifying social goals as elements of rational decision making leads in turn to a wide variety of questions about tradeoffs involving social goals, and about the effects of uncertainty and delay in goal attainment on tradeoffs involving social goals. Recognizing a variety of context-dependent goals leads naturally to consideration of decision rules other than utility maximization, both in descriptive and in prescriptive analysis. Although these considerations about social goals and decision rules apply in most decision-making domains, they are particularly important for environmental decision making, because environmental problems typically involve many players, each with multiple economic, environmental, and social goals, and because examples abound where the players fail to attain the widespread cooperation that would benefit everyone (compared to widespread noncooperation).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
D. Ariely and T. S. Wallsten. Seeking subjective dominance in multidimensional space: An explanation of the asymmetric dominance effect. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63:223–232, 1995.
P. Arora and D. H. Krantz. To cooperate or not to cooperate: Impact of unrelated collaboration on social dilemmas. Poster, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, Toronto, 2005.
P. Arora, N. Peterson, and D. H. Krantz. Group affiliation and the intrinsic rewards of cooperation. Technical report, Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, 2006.
K. J. Arrow. Social choice and individual values. Monograph 12, Yale University: Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, 1951.
R. Axelrod and W. D. Hamilton. The evolution of cooperation. Science, 211:1390–1396, 1981.
J. Bendor. Uncertainty and the evolution of cooperation. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 37:709–733, 1993.
M. B. Brewer. The many faces of social identity: Implications for political psychology. Political Psychology, 22:115–125, 2001.
N. T. Brewer, G. B. Chapman, S. Brownlee, and E. A. Leventhal. Cholesterol control, medication adherence and illness cognition. British Journal of Health Psychology, 7:433–448, 2002.
R. Brewer, M. B. & Kramer. Choice behavior in social dilemmas: Effects of social identity, group size, and decision framing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50:543–549, 1986.
J. S. Bruner. The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31:21–32, 1961.
C. F. Camerer and E. Fehr. When does “economic man” dominate social behaviour? Science, 311:47–52, 2006.
G. B. Chapman. Time discounting of health outcomes. In G. Loewenstein, D. Read, and R. Baumeister, editors, Time and Decision: Economic and Psychological Perspectives on Intertemporal Choice, pages 395–417. Russell Sage Foundation, New York, 2003.
M. D. Condorcet. Essai sur l’application do l’analyse á la probabilité des décisions rendues á la pluralit des voix. Paris, 1785.
R. M. Dawes and D. M. Messick. Social dilemmas. International Journal of Psychology, 35:111–116, 2000.
E. L. Deci and A. C. Moller. The concept of competence: A starting place for understanding intrinsic motivation and self-determined extrinsic motivation. In A. J. Elliot and C. S. Dweck, editors, Handbook of Competence and Motivation, pages 579–597. Guilford, New York, 2005.
M. Douglas. No free gifts: Introduction to Mauss’s essay on The Gift. Risk and Blame: Essays in Cultural Theory. Routledge, London, 1992.
C. Feh. Alliances and successes in Camargue stallions. Animal Behavior, 57:705–713, 1999.
E. Fehr and U. Fischbacher. Third-party punishment and social norms. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25:63–87, 2004.
L. Festinger, S. Schachter, and K. Back. Social Pressure in Informal Groups. Harper and Row, New York, 1950.
P. C. Fishburn. A study of independence in multivariate utility theory. Econometrica, 37:107–121, 1969.
A. P. Fiske. Five core motives, plus or minus five. In S. J. Spencer, S. Fein, M. P. Hanna, and J. M. Olson, editors, Motivated Social Perception, pages 233–246. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ, 2003.
W. Güth. On ultimatum bargaining experiments: A personal review. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 27:329–344, 1995.
G. L. Hammer and H. Meinke. Linking climate, agriculture, and decision making: Experiences and lessons for improving applications of climate forecasts in agriculture. In N. Nichols, G. L. Hammer, and C. Mitchell, editors, Applications of Seasonal Climate Forecasting in Agricultural and Natural Ecosystems. Kluwer Academic Press, The Netherlands, 2000.
G. Hardin. The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162:1243–1248, 1968.
E. T. Higgins. Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52:1280–1300, 1997.
C. K. Hsee and H. Kunreuther. The affection effect in insurance decisions. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 20:149–159, 2000.
J. Huber, J. W. Payne, and C. Puto. Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives: Violations of regularity and the similarity hypothesis. Journal of Consumer Research, 9:90–98, 1982.
D. Kahneman and A. Tversky. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47:263–291, 1979.
D. H. Krantz and H. Kunreuther. Goals and plans in protective decision making. Working paper Wharton Risk Center WP # 06-18, University of Pennsylvania, 2006. http://opim.wharton.upenn.edu/risk/library/06-18.pdf.
G. Loewenstein. Frames of mind in intertemporal choice. Management Science, 34:200–214, 1988.
W. J. M., K. S., and M. D. M. A conceptual review of decision making in social dilemmas: Applying a logic of appropriateness. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8:281–307, 2004.
A. B. Markman and C. P. Moreau. Analogy and analogical comparison in choice. In D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, and B. N. Kokinov, editors, The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science, pages 363–399. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2001.
M. Mauss. The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies. Routledge & Kegan Paul, New York, 1990.
B. McCay. ITQs and community: An essay on environmental governance. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 33:162–170, 2004.
R. F. Meyer. Preferences over time. In R. L. Keeney and H. Raiffa, editors, Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs, Chapter 9. Wiley, New York, 1976.
K. F. Milch. Framing effects in group decisions revisited: The relationship between reasons and choice. Master’s thesis, Department of Psychology, Columbia University, New York, 2006.
B. Orlove. Lines in the Water: Nature and Culture at Lake Titicaca. University of California Press, Berkeley, 2002.
E. Ostrom. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1990.
E. Ostrom. Collective action and the evolution of social norms. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14:137–158, 2000.
E. Ostrom, T. Dietz, N. Dolsak, P. Stern, S. Stonich, and E. Weber, editors. The Drama of the Commons. National Research Council, National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 2002.
T. R. Palfrey and H. Rosenthal. Private incentives in social dillemas: The effects of incomplete information about altruism. Journal of Public Economics, 35:309–332, 1988.
J. W. Payne, J. R. Bettman, and E. J. Johnson. The Adaptive Decision Maker. Cambridge University Press, New York, 1993.
J. Phillips and B. Orlove. Improving climate forecast communication for farm management in Uganda. Final report, NOAA Office of Global Programs, 2004.
D. Read. Is time-discounting hyperbolic or sub-additive? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 23:5–32, 2001.
D. A. Redelmeier and D. N. Heller. Time preference in medical decision making and cost-effectiveness analysis. Medical Decision Making, 13:212–217, 1993.
G. Samuelsson and O. Dehlin. Family network and mortality: Survival chances through the lifespan of an entire age cohort. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 37:277–95, 1993.
S. Schachter. The Psychology of Affiliation: Experimental Studies of the Sources of Gregariousness. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, 1959.
C. Sedikides, D. Ariely, and N. Olsen. Contextual and procedural determinants of partner selection: Of asymmetric dominance and prominence. Social Cognition, 17:118–139, 1999.
E. Shafir. Uncertainty and the difficulty of thinking through disjunctions. Cognition, 50:403–430, 1994.
P. Slovic. The construction of preferences. American Psychologist, 50:364–371, 1995.
P. Suarez, A. Patt, and Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research. The risks of climate forecast application. Risk, Decision and Policy, 9:75–89, 2004.
R. Tronstad, T. Teegerstrom, and D. E. Osgood. The role of technology for reaching underserved audiences. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 86:767–771, 2004.
J. C. Turner, R. J. Brown, and H. Tajfel. Social comparison and group interest in ingroup favoritism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 9:187–204, 1979.
A. Tversky. Intransitivity of preferences. Psychological Review, 76:31–48, 1969.
A. Tversky and D. Kahneman. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211:453–458, 1981.
A. Tversky and D. Kahneman. Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 26:297–323, 1992.
A. Tversky, P. Slovic, and D. Kahneman. The causes of preference reversal. The American Economic Review, 80:204–217, 1990.
T. A. Waite. Background context and decision making in hoarding gray jays. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 12:127–134, 2001.
E. U. Weber, E. J. Johnson, K. F. Milch, H. Chang, J. C. Brodscholl, and D. G. Goldstein. Asymmetric discounting in intertemporal choice: A query theory account. Psychological Sciences, 18:516–523, 2007.
R. B. Zajonc. Social facilitation. Science, 149:269–274, 1965.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Krantz, D.H., Peterson, N., Arora, P., Milch, K., Orlove, B. (2008). Individual Values and Social Goals in Environmental Decision Making. In: Kugler, T., Smith, J.C., Connolly, T., Son, YJ. (eds) Decision Modeling and Behavior in Complex and Uncertain Environments. Springer Optimization and Its Applications, vol 21. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77131-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77131-1_8
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-77130-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-77131-1
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)