Advertisement

Current Perspectives on Linking School Bullying Research to Effective Prevention Strategies

  • Dorothy L. Espelage
  • Susan M. Swearer

In the prevention literature, the terms “primary,” “secondary,” and “tertiary” refer to specific prevention and intervention strategies designed to reduce problem behavior in youth. Perhaps the most widely recognized model that embraces this three-tiered model is Positive Behavior Supports (PBS; Sprague & Golly, 2004; Sprague & Walker, 2005). PBS is a systems-based, behaviorally focused prevention and intervention set of strategies designed to improve educational outcomes and social development for all students. PBS models illustrate that approximately 80% of students will need primary prevention strategies, 15% will need secondary prevention strategies, and 5% will need tertiary prevention strategies. Applied to the problem of bullying, the goal of primary prevention is to reduce the number of new cases of bullying. The idea is that through wholeschool and classroom-wide strategies, new incidents of bullying can be curtailed. Fifteen percent of students will need secondary prevention strategies designed to reduce engagement in bullying. These might be the students who are involved in bullying as a bystander or students who are involved in bullying less frequently or less severely. Finally, tertiary prevention strategies are designed for the 5% of students who are involved in frequent and intense bullying behaviors. These are the students who might have concomitant psychological problems (i.e., depression and anxiety) as a result of their involvement in bullying behaviors (Craig, 1998; Kaltiala-Heino et al., 2000; Kumpulainen et al., 2001; Swearer et al., 2001). The goal of tertiary prevention is to reduce complications, severity, and frequency of bullying behaviors. While not an exhaustive list, Figure 17.1 outlines three bullying prevention and intervention initiatives that illustrate the three PBS tiers. A description of these three initiatives will be provided in the next section of this chapter.

Keywords

Middle School School Climate Proactive Aggression Current Perspective Bully Behavior 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baldry, A. C. & Farrington, D. P. (2000). Bullies and delinquents: Personal characteristics and parental styles. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 10, 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  3. Boulton, M. J. (1997). Teachers’ views on bullying: Definitions, attitudes, and ability to cope. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 223–233.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bukowski, W. M., Sippola, L. K., & Newcomb, A. F. (2000). Variations in patterns of attraction to same- and other-sex peers during early adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 36, 147–154.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Casella, R. (2003). Zero tolerance policy in schools: Rationale, consequences, and alternatives. Teachers College Record, 105, 872–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cowan, R. J., Swearer, S. M., & Sheridan, S. M. (2004). Home-School collaboration. In C. Spielberger (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Applied Psychology (pp. 201–208). San Diego, CA: Elsevier, Inc.Google Scholar
  8. Craig, W. M. (1998). The relationship among bullying, victimization, depression, anxiety, and aggression in elementary school children. Personality and Individual Differences, 24, 123–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Craig, W. M. & Pepler, D. J. (1997). Observations of bullying and victimization in the school yard. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 13(2), 41–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crick, N. R. & Dodge, K. A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children’s social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 74–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Demaray, M. K. & Malecki, C. K. (2003). Perceptions of the frequency and importance of social support by students classified as victims, bullies, and bully/victims in an urban middle school. School Psychology Review, 32(3), 471–489.Google Scholar
  12. Dishion, T. J., McCord, J., & Poulin, F. (1999). When interventions harm: Peer groups and problem behavior. American Psychologist, 54, 755–764.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dodge, K. (1991). The structure of function of reaction and proactive aggression. In D. J. Pepler & K. H. Rubin (Eds.), The Development and Treatment of Childhood Aggression (pp. 201–215). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  14. Dodge, K. A. & Coie, J. D. (1987). Social-information-processing factors in reactive and proactive aggression in children’s peer groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1146–1158.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Doll, B. & Swearer, S. M. (2005). Cognitive behavior interventions for participants in bullying and coercion. In R. B. Mennuti, A. Freeman & R. Christner (Eds.), Cognitive Behavioral Interventions in Educational Settings. New York: Brunner-Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Dunbar, R. I. M. (1988). Primate Social Systems. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Eder, D. (1995). School talk: Gender and adolescent cultures. New Brunswick, N. J.: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Edstrom, L. V., Hirschstein, M., Frey, K., Snell, J. L., & MacKenzie, E. P. (2004, May). Classroom Level Influences in School-Based Bullying Prevention: Key Program Components and Implications for Instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Prevention Research, Quebec City, Canada.Google Scholar
  19. Eron, L. D., Huesmann, L. R., Dubow, E., Romanoff, R., & Yarnel, P. W. (1987). Aggression and its correlates over 22 years. In D. H. Crowell & I. M. Evans (Eds.), Childhood Aggression and Violence: Sources of Influence, Prevention, and Control (pp. 249–262). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  20. Espelage, D. L. & Holt, M. K. (2001). Bullying and victimization during early adolescence: Peer influences and psychosocial correlates. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 2, 123–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Espelage, D. L. & Swearer, S. M. (2003). Research on bullying and victimization: What have we learned and where do we go from here? In S. M. Swearer & D. L. Espelage (Eds.), Bullying prevention and intervention: Integrating research and evaluation findings [Special issue]. School Psychology Review, 32(3), 365–383.Google Scholar
  22. Espelage, D. L., Holt, M. K., & Henkel, R. R. (2003). Examination of peer-group contextual effects on aggression during early adolescence. Child Development, 74(1), 205–220.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Finnegan, R. A., Hodges, E. V. E., & Perry, D. G. (1998). Victimization by peers: Associations with children’s reports of mother-child interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(4), 1076–1086.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fonagy, P., Twemlow, S. W., Vernberg, E., Sacco, F., & Little, T. D. (2005). Creating a peaceful school learning environment: The impact of an antibullying program on educational attainment in elementary schools. Medical Science Monitor, 11, 317–325.Google Scholar
  25. Frey, K. S, Hirschstein, M. K, Snell, J. L., Edstrom, L., Van Schoiack, MacKenzie, E. P. & Broderick, C. J. (2005). Reducing playground bullying and supporting beliefs: an experimental trial of the Steps to Respect program. Developmental Psychology, 41, 479–491.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Garbarino, J. & deLara, E. (2002). And Words Can Hurt Forever: How to Protect Adolescents from Bullying, Harassment, and Emotional Violence. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  27. Graham, S. & Juvonen, J. (2001). An attributional approach to peer victimization. In S. Graham & J. Juvonen (Eds.), Peer Harassment in School: The Plight of the Vulnerable and Victimized (pp. 49–72). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  28. Gordon, A. (2001). School Exclusions in England: Children’s Voices and Adult Solutions?. Educational Studies, 27(1), 69–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hawker, D. S. J. & Boulton, M. J. (2000). Twenty years’ research on peer victimization and psychosocial maladjustment: A meta-analytic review of cross-sectional studies. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 41, 441–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Haynie, D. L., Nansel, T., & Eitel, P. (2001). Bullies, victims, and bully/victims: Distinct groups of at-risk youth. Journal of Early Adolescence, 21, 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hirschstein, M. & Frey, K. S. (2006). Promoting behavior and beliefs that reduce bullying: The Steps to Respect Program. In S. R. Jimerson & M. Furlong (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of School Violence and School Safety: From Research to Practice (pp. 309–323). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  32. Holt, M. K. & Espelage, D. L. (in press). Perceived social support among bullies, victims, and bully-victims. Journal of Youth and Adolescence.Google Scholar
  33. Hoover, J. H. & Hazler, R. J. (1994). Bullies and victims. Elementary School Guidance and Counseling, 25, 212–220.Google Scholar
  34. Howard, K. A., Flora, J., & Griffin, M. (1999). Violence-prevention programs in schools: State of the science and implications for future research. Applied & Preventative Psychology, 8, 197–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Juvonen, J. & Graham, S. (2001). Peer Harassment in School: The Plight of the Vulnerable and Victimized. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  36. Juvoven, J., Nishina, A., & Graham, S. (2000). Self-views versus peer perceptions of victim status among early adolescents. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer Harassment in Schools: The Plight of the Vulnerable and Victimized (pp. 105–124). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  37. Kaltiala-Heino, R., Rimpela, M., Rantanen, P., & Rimpela, A. (2000). Bullying at school: An indicator of adolescents at risk for mental disorders. Journal of Adolescence, 23, 661–674.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kaltiala-Heino, R., Rimpelae, M., & Rantanen, P. (2001). Bullying at school: An indicator for adolescents at risk for mental disorders. Journal of Adolescence, 23, 661–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kingsbury, W. & Espelage, D.L. (in press). Self-blaming attributions as mediators between victimization and psychological outcomes during early adolescence. European Journal of Educational Psychology.Google Scholar
  40. Kochenderfer, B. J. & Ladd, G. W. (1996). Peer victimization: Cause or consequence of school maladjustment? Child Development, 67, 1305–1317.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kumpulainen, K., Rasanen, E., & Henttonen, I. (1998). Children involved in bullying: Psychological disturbance and the persistence of the involvement. Child Abuse & Neglect, 23, 1253–1262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kumpulainen, K., Räsänen, E., & Puura, K. (2001). Psychiatric disorders and the use of mental health services among children involved in bullying. Aggressive Behavior, 27, 102–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Leff, S. S., Kupersmidt, J. B., Patterson, C. J., & Power, T. J. (1999). Factors influencing teacher identification of peer bullies and victims. School Psychology Review, 28, 505–517.Google Scholar
  44. Leslie, A. M. (1987). Pretense and representation: The origins of “theory of mind”. Psychological Review, 94, 412–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Loeber, R., & Dishion, T. (1984). Boys who fight at home and school: Family conditions influencing cross-setting consistency. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 52(5), 759–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. McFadyen-Ketchum, S. A., Bates, J. E., Dodge, K. A., & Pettit, G. S. (1996). Patterns of change in early childhood aggressive-disruptive behavior: Gender differences in predictions from early coercive and affectionate mother-child interactions. Child Development, 67(5), 2417–2433.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Moffitt, T. E. (1993). Adolescent-limited and life-course-persistent anti-social behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review, 100, 674–701.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mouttapa, M., Valente, T., Gallaher, P., Rohrbach, L. A., & Unger, J. B. (2004). Social network predictors of bullying and victimization. Source Adolescence, 39(154), 315–335.Google Scholar
  49. Nansel, T. R., Overpeck, M., Pilla, R. S., Ruan, W. J., Simons-Morton, B., & Scheidt, P. (2001). Bullying behaviors among US youth: Prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 2094–2100.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nansel, T. R., Haynie, D. L., & Simons-Morton, B. G. (2003). The association of bullying and victimization with middle school adjustment. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19(45–61).Google Scholar
  51. Neary, A. & Joseph, S. (1994). Peer victimization and its relation to self-concept and depression among schoolgirls. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 183–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Newman, D. A., Horne, A. M., & Bartolomucci, C. L. (2000). Bully Busters: A Teacher’s Manual for Helping Bullies, Victims, and Bystanders. Champaign, IL: Research Press.Google Scholar
  53. Newman, R. S., Murray, B., & Lussier, C. (2001). Confrontation with aggressive peers at school: Students’ reluctance to seek help from the teacher. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(2), 398–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Olweus, D. (1978). Aggression in the Schools: Bullies and Whipping Boys. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
  55. Olweus, D. (1991). Bully/victim problems among schoolchildren: Basic facts and effects of a school based intervention program. In D. Pepler & K. Rubin (Eds.), The development and treatment of childhood aggression (pp. 411–448). Hills-dale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  56. Olweus, D. (1992). Bullying among schoolchildren: Intervention and prevention. In R. D. Peters, R. J. McMahon, & V. L. Quinse (Eds.), Aggression and Violence Throughout the Life Span (pp. 100–125). London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  57. Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at School. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  58. Olweus, D. (1995). Bullying or peer abuse at school: Intervention and prevention. In G. Davies & S. Lloyd-Bostock (Eds.), Psychology, Law, and Criminal Justice: International Developments in Research and Practice. Oxford, England: Walter De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  59. Olweus, D. (2001). Peer harassment: A critical analysis and some important issues. In S. Graham & J. Juvonen (Eds.), Peer Harassment in School: The Plight of the Vulnerable and Victimized (pp. 3–20). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  60. Olweus, D. & Limber, S. (1999). Blueprints for Violence Prevention: The Bullying Prevention Program. Boulder, CO: Center for the Study and Prevention of Violence.Google Scholar
  61. Orpinas, P. & Horne, A. M. (2006). Bullying Prevention: Creating a Positive School Climate and Developing Social Competence. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Pellegrini, A. D. (2002a). Bullying, victimization, and sexual harassment during the transition to middle school. Educational Psychologist, 37, 151–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pellegrini, A. D. (2002b). Affiliative and aggressive dimensions of dominance and possible functions during early adolescence. Aggression & Violent Behavior, 7(1), 21–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Pellegrini, A. D. & Bartini, M. (2001). Dominance in Early Adolescent Boys: Affiliative and Aggressive Dimensions and Possible Functions. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 47, 142–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Pellegrini, A. D. & Long, J. (2002). A longitudinal study of bullying, dominance, and victimization during the transition from primary to secondary school. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 259–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Reynolds, W. (2003). Bully-Victimization Scales for Schools Bully-Victimization Scale (BVS), Bully-Victimization Distress Scale (BVDS), School Violence Anxiety Scale (SVAS). Harcourt Assessment, UK.Google Scholar
  67. Rigby, K. (2001). Health consequences of bullying and its prevention in schools. In J. Juvonen & S. Graham (Eds.), Peer Harassment in School: The Plight of the Vulnerable and Victimized (pp. 310–331). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  68. Roberts, W. B. & Coursol, D. H. (1996). Strategies for intervention with childhood and adolescent victims of bullying, teasing and intimidation in school settings. Elementary School Guidance and Counseling, 30(3), 204–212.Google Scholar
  69. Rodkin, P. C. (2004). Peer ecologies of aggression and bullying. In D. L. Espelage & S. M. Swearer (Eds.), Bullying in American Schools: A Social-Ecological Perspective on Prevention and Intervention (pp. 87–106). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  70. Rodkin, P. C. & Berger, C. (2005). Who bullies whom? Social status asymmetrics by victim gender. Unpublished Manuscript.Google Scholar
  71. Rodkin, P. C. & Hodges, E. V. (2003). Bullies and victims in the peer ecology: Four questions for psychologists and school professionals. School Psychology Review, 32(3), 384–400.Google Scholar
  72. Salmivalli, C., Karhunen, J., & Lagerspetz, K. M. J. (1996). How do the victims respond to bullying? Aggressive Behavior, 22, 99–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. School-Wide PBS (n.d.). Retrieved May 15, 2006 from http://www.pbis.org/schoolwide.htm.Sheridan, S. M., Napolitano, S. A., & Swearer, S. M. (2002). Best practices in school-community partnerships. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best Practices in School Psychology IV (pp. 321–336). Bethesda, MD: The National Association of School Psychologists.
  74. Skinner, K. & Kochenderfer-Ladd, B. (2000, March). Coping strategies of victimized children. In A. Nishina & J. Juvonen (Chairs), Harassment Across Diverse Contexts. Symposium conducted at the biennial meetings of the Society for Research on Adolescence, Chicago.Google Scholar
  75. Smith, P. K., Madsen, K. C., & Moody, J. C. (1999). What causes the age decline in reports of being bullied at school? Toward a developmental analysis of risks of being bullied. Educational Research, 41, 267–285.Google Scholar
  76. Smith, P. K., Shu, S., & Madsen, K. (2001). Characteristics of victims of school bullying: Developmental changes in coping strategies and skills. In S. Graham & J. Juvonen (Eds.), Peer Harassment in School: The Plight of the Vulnerable and Victimized (pp. 332–352). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  77. Sprague, J. R. & Golly, A. (2004). Best Behavior: Building Positive Behavior Supports in Schools. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.Google Scholar
  78. Sprague, J. R. & Walker, H. M. (2005). Safe and Healthy Schools: Practical Prevention Strategies. NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  79. Stockdale, M. S., Hangaduambo, S., Duys, D., Larson, K., & Sarvela, P. D. (2002). Rural elementary students’, parents’, and teachers’ perceptions of bullying. American Journal of Health Behavior, 26, 266–277.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Sutton, J., Smith, P. K., & Swettenham, J. (1999). Bullying and “theory of mind”: A critique of the “social skills deficit” view of anti-social behaviour. Social Development, 8, 117–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Swearer, S. M. (2001). The Bully Survey. Unpublished manuscript. Lincoln: University of Nebraska.Google Scholar
  82. Swearer, S. M. & Cary, P. T. (2003). Perceptions and attitudes toward bullying in middle school youth: A developmental examination across the bully/victim continuum. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19, 63–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Swearer, S. M. & Doll, B. (2001). Bullying in schools: An ecological framework. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 2, 7–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Swearer, S. M. & Espelage, D. L. (2004). Introduction: A social-ecological framework of bullying among youth. In D. L. Espelage & S. M. Swearer (Eds.), Bullying in American Schools: A Social-Ecological Perspective on Prevention and Intervention (pp. 1–12). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  85. Swearer, S. M. & Givens, J. E. (2006). Designing an Alternative to Suspension for Middle School Bullies. Paper presented at the annual convention of the National Association of School Psychologists, Anaheim, CA.Google Scholar
  86. Swearer, S. M., Song, S. Y., Cary, P. T., Eagle, J. W., & Mickelson, W. T. (2001). Psychosocial correlates in bullying and victimization: The relationship between depression, anxiety, and bully/victim status. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 2, 95–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Troy, M. & Sroufe, L. A. (1987). Victimization among preschoolers: Role of attachment relationship history. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 26, 166–172.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Twemlow, S. W., Fonagy, P., & Sacco, F. C. (2001). An innovative psychodynamically influenced intervention to reduce school violence. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 40, 377–379.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Twemlow, S. W., Fonagy, P., & Sacco, F. C. (2005). A developmental approach to mentalizing communities: II. The Peaceful Schools experiment. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 69, 282–304.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dorothy L. Espelage
    • 1
  • Susan M. Swearer
    • 2
  1. 1.Educational PsychologyUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUSA
  2. 2.Educational PsychologyUniversity of Nebraska–LincolnUSA

Personalised recommendations