Skip to main content

Displaced Log Normal and Lognormal American Option Pricing: A Comparison

  • Chapter
Handbook of Quantitative Finance and Risk Management
  • 533 Accesses

Abstract

This paper compares the American option prices with one known dividend under two alternative specifications of the underlying stock price: displaced log normal and log normal processes. Many option pricing models follow the standard assumption of the Black–Scholes model (Journal of Political Economy 81:637–659, 1973) in which the stock price, follows a log normal process. However, in order to reach a closed form solution for the American option price with one known dividend, Roll (Journal of Financial Economics 5:251–258, 1977), Geske (Journal of Financial Economics 7: 63–81, 1979), and Whaley (Journal of Financial Economics 9:207–211, 1981) assume a displaced lognormal process for the cum-dividend stock price which results in a lognormal process for the ex-dividend stock price. We compare the two alternative pricing results in this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 869.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Note that the call option has a lower bound of Se r(Tt) K. As a result, αD > K(1 − e r(Tt)).

  2. 2.

    Equivalently, according to GRW the ex-dividend price process follows a log normal diffusion:

    $$\frac{\mathit{dS}} {S} = \mathit{rdt} + \sigma \mathit{dW}$$

    that readily implies that f(ln S t , ln S T ) is a bivariate normal with correlation coefficient \(\sqrt{t/T}\).

  3. 3.

    The binomial model is run on 1,000 steps. We verified that the binomial price for the compound option matches up to the third decimal place with the Geske formula (for strikes 10 and 100, both models give 7.996).

References

  • Black, F. and M. Scholes. 1973. “The pricing of options and corporate liabilities.” Journal of Political Economy 81, 637–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geske, R. 1979a. “The valuation of compound options.” Journal of Financial Economics 7, 63–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geske, R. 1979b. “A note on an analytical valuation formula for unprotected American call options on stocks with known dividends.” Journal of Financial Economics 7, 375–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roll, R. 1977. “An analytical valuation formula for unprotected American call options on stocks with known dividends.” Journal of Financial Economics 5, 251–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whaley, R. 1981. “On the valuation of American call options on stocks with known dividends.” Journal of Financial Economics 9, 207–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ren-Raw Chen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chen, RR., Lee, CF. (2010). Displaced Log Normal and Lognormal American Option Pricing: A Comparison. In: Lee, CF., Lee, A.C., Lee, J. (eds) Handbook of Quantitative Finance and Risk Management. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77117-5_29

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics