Skip to main content

International Portfolio Management: Theory and Method

  • Chapter
  • 1134 Accesses

Abstract

This paper investigates the impact of various investment constraints on the benefits and asset allocation of the international optimal portfolio for domestic investors in various countries. The empirical results indicate that local investors in less-developed countries, particularly in East Asia and Latin America, benefit more from global diversification. Although the global financial market is becoming more integrated, adding constraints reduces but does not completely eliminate the diversification benefits of international investment. The addition of portfolio bounds yields the following characteristics of asset allocation: a reduction in the temporal deviation of diversification benefits, a decrease in time-variation of components in optimal portfolio, and an expansion in the range of comprising assets. Our findings are useful for asset management professionals to determine target markets to promote the sales of national/international funds and to manage risk in global portfolios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   869.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   1,099.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The investiblity of the stock market is indicated by the degrees with which foreign investors can trade as do local investors in the domestic markets and the liquidity of assets. See Bae et al. (2004).

  2. 2.

    For instance, the ownership of listed companies by foreigners cannot exceed the limit of 10% in Chile, 25% in South Korea, and 10% in Taiwan. In Brazil, international institutional investors cannot own more than 49% of voting share. In Switzerland, corporations are likely to issue international investors special shares that are traded at a premium over the same stocks available exclusively to Swiss nationals.

References

  • Bae, K., K. Chan, and A. Ng. 2004. “Investibility and return volatility.” Journal of Financial Economics 71, 239–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, T., A. Demirgüç-Kunt, and R. Levine. 2003. “Law, endowments, and finance.” Journal of Financial Economics 70, 137–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekaert, G. and C. R. Harvey. 1995. “Time-varying world market integration.” Journal of Finance 50, 403–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekaert, G. and C. R. Harvey. 2003. “Emerging markets finance.” Journal of Empirical Finance 10, 3–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekaert, G., C. Harvey, and A. Ng. 2005. “Market integration and contagion.” Journal of Business 78, 39–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekaert, G. and M. Urias. 1996. “Diversification, integration and emerging market closed-end funds.” Journal of Finance 51, 835–869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bekaert, G., R. Hodrick, and X. Zhang. 2005. International stock return comovements, NBER working paper, Columbia Business School, Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, L. K., J. Karceski, and J. Lakonishok. 1999. “On portfolio optimization: forecasting covariances and choosing the risk model.” Review of Financial Studies 12, 937–974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, J., V. Errunza, K. Hogan, and M. Hung. 2005. “An intertemporal international asset pricing model: theory and empirical evidence.” European Financial Management 11, 218–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiou, W. 2008. “Who benefits more from international diversification?” Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions, and Money 18, 466–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiou, W., A. C. Lee, and C. Chang. 2009. “Do investors still benefit from international diversification with investment constraints?” Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 49(2), 448–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosset, J. and J. Suret. 1995. “Political risk and the benefit of international portfolio diversification.” Journal of International Business Studies 26, 3013–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, F. and F. A. De Roon. 2005. “Time-varying market integration and expected returns in emerging markets.” Journal of Financial Economics 78, 583–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirgüç-Kunt, A. and V. Maksimovic. 1998. “Law, finance, and firm growth.” Journal of Finance 53, 2107–2137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Roon, F. A., T. E. Nijman, and B. J. Werker. 2001. “Testing for mean-variance spanning with short sales constraints and transaction costs: the case of emerging markets.” Journal of Finance 56, 721–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Santis, G. and B. Gerard. 1997. “International asset pricing and portfolio diversification with time-varying risk.” Journal of Finance 52, 1881–1912.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djankov, S., R. La Porta, F. Lopez-de-Silanes, and A. Shleifer. 2003. “Courts.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 118, 453–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djankov, S., R. La Porta, F. Lopez-de-Silanes, and A. Shleifer. 2008. “The law and economics of self-dealing.” Journal of Financial Economics 88, 430–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driessen, J. and L. Laeven. 2007. “International portfolio diversification benefits: cross-country evidence from a local perspective.” Journal of Banking and Finance 31, 1693–1712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elton, E. J., M. J. Gruber, S. J. Brown, and W. N. Goetzmann. 2007. Modern portfolio theory and investment analysis. Wiley, NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Errunza, V., K. Hogan, and M. Hung. 1999. “Can the gains from international diversification be achieved without trading abroad?” Journal of Finance 54, 2075–2107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Errunza, V., E. Losq, and P. Padmanabhan. 1992. “Tests of integration, mild segmentation and segmentation hypotheses.” Journal of Banking and Finance 16, 949–972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, J., C. Kirby, and B. Ostdiek. 2001. “The economic value of volatility timing.” Journal of Finance 56, 329–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, J. and A. Marshall. 2005. “An empirical examination of the benefits of international diversification.” Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money 15, 455–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French, K. R. and J. M. Poterba. 1991. “Investor diversification and international equity markets.” American Economic Review 81, 222–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, R. C. and B. Hollifield. 1992. “When will mean-variance efficient portfolios be well diversified?” Journal of Finance 47, 1785–1809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, C. 1995. “Predictable risk and returns in emerging markets.” Review of Financial Studies 8, 773–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jagannathan, R. and T. S. Ma. 2003. “Risk reduction in large portfolios: why imposing the wrong constraints helps.” Journal of Finance 58, 1651–1683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny. 1998. “Law and finance.” Journal of Political Economy 106, 1113–1155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny. 2000. “Investor protection and corporate governance.” Journal of Financial Economics 58, 3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, K., A. Sarkar, and Z. Wang. 2003. “Diversification benefits of emerging markets subject to portfolio constraints.” Journal of Empirical Finance 10, 57–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, H. 1952. “Portfolio selection.” Journal of Finance 7, 77–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novomestky, F. 1997. “A dynamic, globally diversified, index neutral synthetic asset allocation strategy.” Management Science 43, 998–1016.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obstfeld, M. 1994. “Risk-taking, global diversification, and growth.” American Economic Review 84, 1310–1329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pástor, L. and R. Stambaugh. 2000. “Comparing asset pricing models: an investment perspective.” Journal of Financial Economics 56, 335–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stulz, R. M. and R. Williamson. 2003. “Culture, openness, and finance.” Journal of Financial Economics 70, 313–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Z. 1998. “Efficiency loss and constraints on portfolio holdings.” Journal of Financial Economics 48, 359–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wan-Jiun Paul Chiou .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chiou, WJ.P., Lee, CF. (2010). International Portfolio Management: Theory and Method. In: Lee, CF., Lee, A.C., Lee, J. (eds) Handbook of Quantitative Finance and Risk Management. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77117-5_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics