Skip to main content

Crustaceans as Powerful Models in Aquatic Chemical Ecology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Chemical Communication in Crustaceans

Abstract

Crustaceans use chemical cues to find and assess mates, signal dominance, recognize known conspecifics, find favored foods and appropriate habitats, and assess threats such as the presence of predators. The behavior demonstrating these cues is dramatic (e.g., males of some species will guard and try to copulate with sponges, rocks, or even other males treated with water holding receptive, conspecific females), but the specific chemicals eliciting these behaviors have rarely been unambiguously described. Here I discuss the known compounds that affect crustacean behaviors and note that identifying active chemical signals and cues may be a challenge because these chemicals may: (1) occur at low concentrations in a media holding many other metabolites, (2) be complex blends instead of particular pure compounds – and it may be the blend itself (the specific ratio of different signaling molecules) that carries information, (3) be “combination-lock” cascades of chemical signals and cues that have to occur in the correct order to generate a critical behavior, and (4) have been selected as critical molecules eliciting behavior because they rapidly degrade, thus preventing maladaptive behavior based on old data. These potential traits will make separation and structural determination difficult. Despite many signals and cues being delivered via water, there are several examples of cuing compounds being lipid-soluble; it is important for biologists to realize that even lipids dissolve to some degree in water and can thus function as waterborne cues. Because of the critical role that crustaceans play in marine and freshwater food webs, the effects of chemical mediation of crustacean behavior can reach far beyond the direct effects on crustaceans to impact community organization and even ecosystem-level processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Acquistapace P, Calamai L, Hazlett BA, Gherardi F (2005) Source of alarm substances in crayfish and their preliminary chemical characterization. Can J Zool 83:1624–1630

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Asai N, Fusetani N, Matsunaga S, Sasaki J (2000) Sex pheromones of the hair crab EP Erimacrus isenbeckii. Part 1: isolation and structures of novel ceramides. Tetrahedron 56:9895–9899

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Atema J, Steinbach MA (2007) Chemical communication in the social behavior of the lobster Homarus americanus and other decapod crustacea. In: Duffy E, Thiel M (eds) Ecology and evolution of social behavior: crustaceans as model systems, pp. 115–144. Oxford University Press, New York, p 520

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagoien E, Kiorboe T (2005) Blind dating – mate finding in planktonic copepods. I. Tracking the pheromone trail of Centropages typicus. Mar Ecol Progr Ser 300:105–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailey RJE, Birkett MA, Ingvarsdottir A, Mordue (Luntz) AJ, Mordue W, O’Shea B, Pickett JA, Wadhams LJ (2006) The role of semiochemicals in host location and non-host avoidance by salmon louse (Lepeophtheirus salmonis) copepodids. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 63:448–456

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkepile DE, Parker JD, Woodson CD, Mills HJ, Kubanek J, Sobecky PA, Hay ME (2006) Chemically-mediated competition between microbes and animals: microbes as consumers in food webs. Ecology 87:2821–2831

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bushmann PJ, Atema J (1996) Nephropore rosette glands of the lobster Homarus americanus: possible sources of urine pheromones. J Crust Biol 16:221–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz-Rivera E, Hay ME (2003) Prey nutritional quality interacts with chemical defenses to affect consumer feeding and fitness. Ecol Monogr 73:483–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dreanno C, Kirby RR, Clare AS (2006) Locating the barnacle settlement pheromone: spatial and ontogenetic expression of the settlement-inducing protein complex of Balanus amphitrite. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 273:2721–2728

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ferner MC, Smee DL, Chang YP (2005) Cannibalistic crabs respond to the scent of injured conspecifics: danger or dinner? Mar Ecol Prog Ser 300:193–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gil-Turnes MS, Fenical W (1992) Embryos of Homarus americanus are protected by epibiotic bacteria. Biol Bull 182:105–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gil-Turnes MS, Hay ME, Fenical W (1989) Symbiotic marine bacteria chemically defend crustacean embryos from a pathogenic fungus. Science 246:116–118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hardege JD, Jennings A, Hayden D, Muller CT, Pascoe D, Bentley MG, Clare AS (2002) Novel behavioural assay and partial purification of a female-derived sex pheromone in Carcinus maenas. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 244:179–189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hassler C, Brockmann HJ (2001) Evidence for use of chemical cues by male horseshoe crabs when locating nesting females (Limulus polyphemus). J Chem Ecol 27:2319–2335

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hay ME (1996) Marine chemical ecology: what is known and what is next? J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 200:103–134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hay M, Kubanek J (2002) Community and ecosystem level consequences of chemical signaling in the plankton. J Chem Ecol 28:1981–1996

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay ME, Pawlik JR, Duffy JE, Fenical W (1989) Seaweed-herbivore-predator interactions: host-plant specialization reduces predation on small herbivores. Oecologia 81:418–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay ME, Duffy JE, Fenical W (1990) Host-plant specialization decreases predation on a marine amphipod: an herbivore in plant’s clothing. Ecology 71:733–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayden D, Jennings A, Muller C, Pascoe D, Bublitz R, Webb H, Breithaupt T, Watkins L, Hardege J (2007) Sex-specific mediation of foraging in the shore crab, Carcinus maenas. Horm Behav 52:162–168

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horner AJ, Weissburg MJ, Derby CD (2004) Dual antennular chemosensory pathways can mediate orientation by Caribbean spiny lobsters in naturalistic flow conditions. J Exp Biol 207:3785–3796

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kamio M, Matsunaga S, Fusetani N (2002) Copulation pheromone in the crab Telmessus cheiragonus (Brachyura: Decapoda). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 234:183–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long JD, Smalley GW, Barsby T, Anderson JT, Hay ME (2007) Chemical cues induce consumer-specific defenses in a bloom-forming marine phytoplankton. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 104:10512–10517

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews LM (2003) Tests of the mate-guarding hypothesis for social monogamy: male snapping shrimp prefer to associate with high-value females. Behav Ecol 14:63–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClintock JB, Janssen J (1990) Pteropod abduction as a chemical defense in a pelagic Antarctic amphipod. Nature 346:462–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller G, Tybur JM, Jordan BD (2007) Ovulatory cycle effects on tip earnings by lap dancers: economic evidence for human estrus? Evol Hum Behav 28:375–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore PA (2007) Agonistic behavior in freshwater crayfish: the influence of intrinsic and extrinsic factors on aggressive behavior and dominance. In: Duffy JE, Thiel M, Duffy JE, Thiel M (eds) Evolutionary ecology of social and sexual systems: crustacea as models organisms. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 90–114

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moore PA, Bergman DA (2005) The smell of success and failure: the role of intrinsic and extrinsic chemical signals on the social behavior of crayfish. Integr Comp Biol 45:650–657

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pohnert G, Steinke M, Tollrian R (2007) Chemical cues, defence metabolites and the shaping of pelagic interspecific interactions. Trends Ecol Evol 22:198–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raffell JA, Krug PJ, Zimmer RK (2004) The ecological and evolutionary consequences of sperm chemoattraction. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 101:4501–4506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rittschof D, Cohen JH (2004) Crustacean peptide and peptide-like pheromones and kairomones. Peptides 25:1503–1516

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sato T, Goshima S (2007) Female choice in response to risk of sperm limitation by the stone crab, Hapalogaster dentate. Anim Behav 73:331–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selander E, Thor P, Toth G, Pavia H (2006) Copepods induce paralytic shellfish toxin production in marine dinoflagellates. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 273:1673–1680

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smee DL, Weissburg MJ (2006a) Clamming up: environmental forces diminish the perceptive ability of bivalve prey. Ecology 87:1587–1598

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smee DL, Weissburg MJ (2006b) Hard clams (Mercenaria mercenaria) evaluate predation risk using chemical signals from predators and injured conspecifics. J Chem Ecol 32:605–619

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Snell TW, Morris RD (1993) Sexual communication in copepods and rotifers. Hydrobiologia 255:109–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stachowicz JJ, Hay ME (1999a) Reduced mobility is associated with compensatory feeding and increased diet breadth of marine crabs. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 188:169–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stachowicz JJ, Hay ME (1999b) Reducing predation through chemically-mediated camouflage: indirect effects of plant defenses on herbivores. Ecology 80:495–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stebbing PD, Bentley MG, Watson GJ (2003) Mating behaviour and evidence for a female released courtship pheromone in the signal crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus. J Chem Ecol 29:465–475

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stern K, McClintock MK (1998) Regulation of ovulation by human pheromones. Nature 392:177–179

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tankersley RA, Bullock TM, Forward RB, Rittschof D (2002) Larval release behaviors in the blue crab Callinectes sapidus: role of chemical cues. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 273:1–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill R, Gangestad SW (1999) The scent of symmetry: a human sex pheromone that signals fitness? Evol Hum Behav 20:175–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toth GB (2004) Screening for induced herbivore resistance in Swedish intertidal seaweeds. Mar Biol 151:1597–1604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tricarico E, Gherardi F (2006) Shell acquisition by hermit crabs: which tactic is more efficient? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:492–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshida WY, Bryan PJ, Baker BJ, McClintock JB (1995) Pteroenone: a defensive metabolite of the abducted Antarctic pteropod Clione antartica. J Org Chem 60:780–782

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler TA, Forward RB (2007) Larval release behaviors in the caribbean spiny lobster, Panulirus argus: role of peptide pheromones. J Chem Ecol 33:1795–1805

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

My research has been supported primarily by the U.S. National Science Foundation and the Fogarty International Center of the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark E. Hay .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hay, M.E. (2010). Crustaceans as Powerful Models in Aquatic Chemical Ecology. In: Breithaupt, T., Thiel, M. (eds) Chemical Communication in Crustaceans. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77101-4_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics