Abstract
Insect pheromones, especially sex pheromones, have successfully contributed to pest management programs around the world since the 1970s. In this chapter I examine some of the ways in which pheromones have been used in insect management programs and introduce some of the real-world issues that have promoted, and hindered, their adoption for use against different species. These include biological differences in the mate-finding behaviors of different species, the chemistries of the pheromones that they use, the successful engineering of controlled-release dispensers for different compounds, as well as the different political, economic, and use-pattern-related situations that exist even just in the United States to more strictly regulate the use of some types of pheromones and techniques than others. The experiences of entomologists who have witnessed insect pheromones finding their place in integrated pest management systems over the past four decades should be instructive in helping crustacean biologists develop crustacean pheromone systems into useful management tools. By far the greatest use of insect pheromones has been for monitoring existing populations and detecting the presence of invasive species. Monitoring with pheromone traps allows for other, curative measures such as insecticide applications or cultural/biological controls to be implemented intelligently. Mating disruption has taken its place in different cropping systems around the world, especially in fruit orchards. Research has now shown that pheromone does not need to completely shut off mating, but merely impede it to the point of delaying first and second matings in females to reduce their fecundity by ca. 50%. Mass trapping by deploying large numbers of pheromone traps regularly spaced in the cropping area has reemerged as a viable and effective technique for using pheromones directly for population suppression. This use of pheromones has been most effective in male-emitted pheromone systems such as in pest species of weevils (snout beetles). In these systems females can be trapped out using the synthetic version of the male-emitted pheromone, and thus egg-laying is directly reduced by mass trapping of females. Although the experimental, technological, and legal hurdles of developing pheromones for widespread use in the field can seem daunting, experience has shown that with determination and a real need, these hurdles can be overcome.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Baker TC (1989) Sex pheromone communication in the Lepidoptera: new research progress. Experientia 45:248–262
Baker TC (2008) Use of pheromones in IPM. In: Radcliffe T, Hutchinson B (eds) Integrated Pest Management. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 273–285
Baker TC, Haynes KF (1987) Manoeuvres used by flying male oriental fruit moths to relocate a sex pheromone plume in an experimentally shifted wind-field. Physiol Entomol 12:263–279
Baker TC, Kuenen LPS (1982) Pheromone source location by flying moths: a supplementary non-anemotactic mechanism. Science 16:424–427
Baker TC, Willis MA, Haynes KF, Phelan PL (1985) A pulsed cloud of sex pheromone elicits upwind flight in male moths. Physiol Entomol 10(2):57–265
Baker TC, Mafra-Neto A, Dittl T, Rice MA (1997) Novel controlled release device for disrupting sex pheromone communication in moths. IOBC/wprs Bulletin 20:141–149
Cardé RT, Minks AK (1995) Control of moth pests by mating disruption: successes and constraints. Annu Rev Entomol 40:559–585
Cardé RT, Mafra-Neto A, Staten RT, Kuenen LPS (1997) Understanding mating disruption in the pink bollworm moth. IOBC/wprs Bulletin 20:191–201
David CT, Kennedy JS, Ludlow AR, Perry JN, Wall C (1982) A re-appraisal of insect flight towards a point source of wind-borne odor. J Chem Ecol 8:1207–1215
David CT, Kennedy JS, Ludlow AR (1983) Finding of a sex pheromone source by gypsy moths released in the field. Nature 303:804–806
Elkinton JS, Cardé RT (1981) The use of pheromone traps to monitor distribution and population trends of the gypsy moth. In: Mitchell ER (ed) Management of insect pests with semiochemicals. Plenum, New York, pp 41–55
Elkinton JS, Cardé RT (1987) Pheromone puff trajectory and upwind flight of the male gypsy moth in a forest. Physiol Entomol 12:399–406
Fadamiro HY, Baker TC (1999) Reproductive performance and longevity of female European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis: effects of multiple mating, delay in mating, and adult feeding. J Insect Physiol 45:385–392
Fadamiro HY, Cossé AA, Baker TC (1999) Mating disruption of European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis by using two types of sex pheromone dispensers deployed in grassy aggregation sites in Iowa cornfields J Asia-Pacific Entomol 2:121–132
Gomez G, Atema J (1994) Frequency filter properties of lobster chemoreceptor cells determined with high-resolution stimulus measurement. J Comp Physiol 174:803–811
Gosselin T, Sainte-Marie B, Bernatchez L (2005) Geographic variation of multiple paternity in the American lobster, Homarus americanus. Mol Ecol 14:1517–1525
Haynes KF, Baker TC (1989) An analysis of anemotactic flight in female moths stimulated by host odour and comparison with the males’ response to sex pheromone. Physiol Entomol 14:279–289
Kaissling KE (1998) Flux detectors versus concentration detectors: two types of chemoreceptors. Chem Senses 23:99–111
Kennedy JS (1983) Zigzagging and casting as a programmed response to wind-borne odour: a review. Physiol Entomol 8:109–120
Kennedy JS, Marsh D (1974) Pheromone-regulated anemotaxis in flying moths. Science 184:999–1001
Knight AL (1997) Delay of mating of codling moth in pheromone disrupted orchards. IOBC/wprs Bulletin 20:203–206
Leal WS, Sawada M, Matsuyama S, Kuwahara Y, Hasegawa M (1993) Unusual periodically of sex pheromone production in the large black chafer Holotrichia parallela. J Chem Ecol 19:1381–1391
Linn CE Jr, Campbell MG, Roelofs WL (1986a) Male moth sensitivity to multicomponent pheromones: critical role of female-released blend in determining the functional role of components and active space of the pheromone. J Chem Ecol 12:659–668
Linn CE Jr, Campbell MG, Roelofs WL (1986b) Pheromone components and active spaces: what do moths smell and where do they smell it? Science 237:650–652
Mafra-Neto A, Baker TC (1996) Timed, metered sprays of pheromone disrupt mating of Cadra cautella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). J Agric Entomol 13:149–168
Mafra-Neto A, Cardé RT (1994) Fine-scale structure of pheromone plumes modulates upwind orientation of flying moths. Nature 369:142–144
Mordue Luntz AJ, Birkett MA (2009) A review of host finding behaviour in the parasitic sea louse, Lepeophtheirus salmonis (Caligidae: Copepoda). J Fish Dis 32:3–13
Murlis J (1986) The structure of odor plumes. In: Payne TL, Kennedy CEJ, Birch MC (eds) Mechanisms in Insect Olfaction. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 27–39
Oehlschlager AC, Chinchilla C, Castillo G, Gonzalez L (2002) Control of red ring disease by mass trapping of Rhynchophorus palmarum (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Fla Entomol 85:507–513
Quero C, Fadamiro HY, Baker TC (2001) Responses of male Helicoverpa zea to single pulses of sex pheromone and behavioural antagonist. Physiol Entomol 26:106–115
Rice RE, Kirsch P (1990) Mating disruption of oriental fruit moth in the United States. In: Ridgway RL, Silverstein RM, Inscoe MN (eds) Behavior-Modifying Chemicals for Insect Management. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 193–212
Ridgway RL, Inscoe MN, Dickerson WA (1990) Role of the boll weevil pheromone in pest management. In: Ridgway RL, Silverstein RM, Inscoe MN (eds) Behavior-modifying chemicals for insect management. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 437–472
Roelofs WL, CardÕ RT (1971) Hydrocarbon sex pheromone in tiger moths. Science 171:684–686
Shorey HH, Gerber RG (1996) Use of puffers for disruption of sex pheromone communication of codling moths (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in walnut orchards. Environ Entomol 25:1398–1400
Shorey HH, Sisk CB, Gerber RG (1996) Widely separated pheromone release sites for disruption of sex pheromone communication in two species of Lepidoptera. Environ Entomol 25:446–451
Showers WB, Whitford F, Smelser RB, Keaster AJ, Robinson JF, Lopez JD, Taylor SE (1989) Direct evidence for meteorologically driven long-range dispersals of an economically important moth. Ecology 70:987–992
Stelinski LL, Gut LJ, Pierzchala AV, Miller JR (2004) Field observations quantifying attraction of four tortricid moth species to high-doage pheromone rope dispensers in untreated and pheromone-treated apple orchards. Entomol Exp Et Appl 113:187–196
Stelinski LL, Gut LJ, Epstein D, Miller JR (2005) Attraction of four tortricid moth species to high dosage pheromone rope dispensers: observations implicating false plume following as an important factor in mating disruption. IOBC/wprs Bulletin 28:313–317
Stensmyr MC, Erland S, Hallberg E, Wallén R, Greenaway P, Hansson BS (2005) Insect-like olfactory adaptations in the terrestrial giant robber crab. Curr Biol 15:116–121
Vickers NJ, Baker TC (1992) Male Heliothis virescens sustain upwind flight in response to experimentally pulsed filaments of their sex-pheromone. J Insect Behav 5:669–687
Vickers NJ, Baker TC (1994) Reiterative responses to single strands of odor promote sustained upwind flight and odor source location by moths. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:5756–5760
Vickers NJ, Baker TC (1997) Chemical communication in heliothine moths. VII. Correlation between diminished responses to point-source plumes and single filaments similarly tainted with a behavioral antagonist. J Comp Physiol 180:523–536
Wright RH (1958) The olfactory guidance of flying insects. Can Entomol 98:81–89
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Baker, T.C. (2010). Insect Pheromones: Useful Lessons for Crustacean Pheromone Programs?. In: Breithaupt, T., Thiel, M. (eds) Chemical Communication in Crustaceans. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77101-4_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77101-4_27
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-77100-7
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-77101-4
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)