Pheromones and Behavior



Chemical communication is widely used by crustaceans, for example, in sexual interactions, larval release, and planktonic settlement. However, we know the identity of very few of the molecules involved. In this chapter, I introduce pheromones and contrast them with signature mixtures. Pheromones are molecules that are evolved signals, in defined ratios in the case of multiple component pheromones, which are emitted by an individual and received by a second individual of the same species, in which they cause a specific reaction, for example, a stereotyped behavior or a developmental process. Signature mixtures are variable chemical mixtures (a subset of the molecules in an animal’s chemical profile) learned by other conspecifics and used to recognize an organism as an individual (e.g., lobsters, mammals) or as a member of a particular social group such as a family, clan, or colony (e.g., mammals, desert woodlouse Hemilepistus reaumuri, ants, bees). A key difference between pheromones and signature mixtures is that in all taxa so far investigated it seems that signature mixtures need to be learnt (unlike most pheromones). These signature mixtures may be best thought of as cues. Pheromones evolve from molecules which give a selective advantage to the receiver and signaler. The evolution of pheromones is facilitated by the combinatorial basis of the olfactory system found in crustaceans and other animals. In crustaceans, some pheromones are also detected by the distributed chemosensory system. Crustaceans have great potential as model organisms for chemical communication research, in particular now that the Daphnia pulex genome has been sequenced.


Pheromone Component Chemical Communication Moth Species Olfactory Lobe Signature Mixture 



I thank the late Martin Birch for his inspiring lead on insect pheromones, Oxford University Continuing Education (in particular Dr G.P. Thomas) and Zoology Departments for supporting me over many years, and the editors and chapter referees for their suggestions.


  1. Atema J, Steinbach MA (2007) Chemical communication and social behavior of the lobster Homarus americanus and other decapod Crustacea. In: Duffy JE, Thiel M (eds) Evolutionary ecology of social and sexual systems: crustaceans as model organisms. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 115–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brennan PA, Kendrick KM (2006) Mammalian social odours: attraction and individual recognition. Philos Trans R Soc B 361:2061–2078CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown WL, Eisner T, Whittaker RH (1970) Allomones and kairomones: transpecific chemical messengers. Bioscience 20:21–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Byers JA (1992) Optimal fractionation and bioassay plans for isolation of synergistic chemicals: the subtractive-combination method. J Chem Ecol 18:1603–1621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caprio J, Derby CD (2008) Aquatic animal models in the study of chemoreception. In: Firestein S, Beauchamp GK (eds) The senses: a comprehensive reference, volume 4 olfaction & taste. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 97–134Google Scholar
  6. Derby CD, Sorensen PW (2008) Neural processing, perception, and behavioral responses to natural chemical stimuli by fish and crustaceans. J Chem Ecol 34:898–914CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Dicke M, Sabelis MW (1988) Infochemical terminology: based on cost-benefit analysis rather than origin of compounds? Funct Ecol 2:131–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dreanno C, Matsumura K, Dohmae N, Takio K, Hirota H, Kirby RR, Clare AS (2006) An alpha2-macroglobulin-like protein is the cue to gregarious settlement of the barnacle Balanus amphitrite. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:14396–14401CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Ekerholm M, Hallberg E (2005) Primer and short-range releaser pheromone properties of premolt female urine from the shore crab Carcinus maenas. J Chem Ecol 31:1845–1864CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Hallem EA, Carlson JR (2006) Coding of odors by a receptor repertoire. Cell 125:143–160CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hansson BS (2002) A bug’s smell – research into insect olfaction. Trends Neurosci 25:270–274CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hesselschwerdt J, Tscharner S, Necker J, Wantzen K (2009) A local gammarid uses kairomones to avoid predation by the invasive crustaceans Dikerogammarus villosus and Orconectes limosus. Biol Invasions 11:2133–2140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hölldobler B, Carlin NF (1987) Anonymity and specificity in the chemical communication signals of social insects. J Comp Physiol A 161:567–581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Horner AJ, Weissburg MJ, Derby CD (2008) The olfactory pathway mediates sheltering behavior of Caribbean spiny lobsters, Panulirus argus, to conspecific urine signals. J Comp Physiol A 194:243–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Johnson ME, Atema J (2005) The olfactory pathway for individual recognition in the American lobster Homarus americanus. J Exp Biol 208:2865–2872CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnston RE (2003) Chemical communication in rodents: from pheromones to individual recognition. J Mammal 84:1141–1162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Karlson P, Lüscher M (1959) ‘Pheromones’: a new term for a class of biologically active substances. Nature 183:55–56CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Kelly DR (1996) When is a butterfly like an elephant? Chem Biol 3:595–602CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Knight-Jones EW (1953) Laboratory experiments on gregariousness during settling in Balanus balanoides and other barnacles. J Exp Biol 30:584–598Google Scholar
  20. Law RH, Regnier FE (1971) Pheromones. Annu Rev Biochem 40:533–548CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Linsenmair KE (1987) Kin recognition in subsocial arthropods, in particular in the desert isopod Hemilepistus reaumuri. In: Fletcher DJC, Michener CD (eds) Kin recognition in animals. Wiley, Chichester, pp 121–208Google Scholar
  22. Linsenmair KE (2007) Sociobiology of terrestrial isopods. In: Duffy JE, Thiel M (eds) Evolutionary ecology of social and sexual systems: crustaceans as model organisms. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 339–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Maynard Smith J, Harper D (2003) Animal signals. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  24. Monnin T, Malosse C, Peeters C (1998) Solid-phase microextraction and cuticular hydrocarbon differences related to reproductive activity in queenless ant Dinoponera quadriceps. J Chem Ecol 24:473–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nordlund DA, Lewis WJ (1976) Terminology of chemical releasing stimuli in intraspecific and interspecific interactions. J Chem Ecol 2:211–220CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Peñalva-Arana DC, Lynch M, Robertson HM (2009) The chemoreceptor genes of the waterflea Daphnia pulex: many Grs but no Ors. BMC Evol Biol 9:79–90CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Penn D, Potts WK (1998) Chemical signals and parasite-mediated sexual selection. Trends Ecol Evol 13:391–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rasmussen LEL, Lee TD, Roelofs WL, Zhang AJ, Daves GD (1996) Insect pheromone in elephants. Nature 379:684CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Rittschof D, Cohen JH (2004) Crustacean peptide and peptide-like pheromones and kairomones. Peptides 25:1503–1516CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Sachs BD (1999) Airborne aphrodisiac odor from estrous rats: implication for pheromonal classification. In: Johnston RE, Müller-Schwarze D, Sorensen PW (eds) Advances in chemical signals in vertebrates. Plenum, New York, pp 333–342Google Scholar
  31. Scott-Phillips TC (2008) Defining biological communication. J Evol Biol 21:387–395CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Sherman PW, Reeve HK, Pfennig DW (1997) Recognition systems. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 69–96Google Scholar
  33. Stacey NE, Sorensen PW (2006) Reproductive pheromones. Fish Physiol 24:359–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Thiel M, Duffy JE (2007) The behavioral ecology of crustaceans: a primer in taxonomy, morphology, and biology. In: Duffy JE, Thiel M (eds) Evolutionary ecology of social and sexual systems: crustaceans as model organisms. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 3–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tibbetts EA, Dale J (2007) Individual recognition: it is good to be different. Trends Ecol Evol 22:529–537CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Vosshall LB (2008) Scent of a fly. Neuron 59:685–689CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. wFleaBase. 2009. Daphnia pulex genome Accessed 20 April 2009
  38. Wilson EO, Bossert WH (1963) Chemical communication among animals. Recent Prog Horm Res 19:673–716PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Wyatt TD (2003) Pheromones and animal behaviour: communication by smell and taste. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wyatt TD (2005) Pheromones: convergence and contrasts in insects and vertebrates. In: Mason RT, LeMaster MP, Müller-Schwarze D (eds) Chemical signals in vertebrates 10. Springer, New York, pp 7–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wyatt TD (2009) Fifty years of pheromones. Nature 457:262–263CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Wyatt TD (2010) Pheromones and signature mixtures: defining species-wide signals and variable cues for individuality in both invertebrates and vertebrates. J Comp Physiol A 196:685–700Google Scholar
  43. Xue BY, Rooney AP, Kajikawa M, Okada N, Roelofs WL (2007) Novel sex pheromone desaturases in the genomes of corn borers generated through gene duplication and retroposon fusion. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:4467–4472CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ZoologyOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations