Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Deception in Visual and Chemical Communication in Crustaceans

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Chemical Communication in Crustaceans

Abstract

Deception in animal communication occurs when one animal causes another to respond to a condition that does not exist or to fail to respond to one that does. Signals that bluff produce the first kind of error, behavior that hides causes the second, and both are common in visual communication by crustaceans. In contrast, crustacean chemical communication may usually be honest because the communicative chemicals typically are byproducts of the biochemical mechanisms by which crustaceans are built and operate. These cues, which often are released in urine, reliably reveal an individual’s identity, sex, reproductive state, and condition. There are, however, opportunities for deception by bluffing and by hiding in the chemical channel. Bluffing may occur when dominance relationships are learned and individuals recognize each other. Subordinates may avoid known dominants even after the condition of the dominant has declined and it is no longer able to win a fight with the subordinate. Frequent probing by subordinates should check such bluffing. Hiding in the chemical channel may occur in escalated fights in which one animal fails to chemically announce its intent to strike and wins by delivering a blind-side punch to an unprepared opponent. Receptive female crabs and lobsters may also withhold cues of their receptivity to avoid courtship by some males, yet direct the same cues to preferred potential mates. In species with multiple male morphs, we speculate that subordinate males may hide from dominants by withholding male odors or mimicking female odors. In species with internal fertilization we also suggest that male seminal fluids may contain chemicals that affect female reproductive processes and bias the rate the male’s sperm fertilize the female’s eggs. Detecting deception in chemical communication will be very challenging, but we encourage crustacean researchers to keep this possibility in mind when examining signaling behavior via chemicals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams ES, Caldwell RL (1990) Deceptive communication in asymmetric fights of the stomatopod crustacean Gonodactylus bredini. Anim Behav 39:706–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnott G, Elwood RW (2010) Signal residuals and hermit crab displays: flaunt it if you have it! Anim Behav 79:137–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnqvist G, Rowe L (2005) Sexual conflict. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Atema J, Steinbach MA (2007) Chemical communication and social behavior of the lobster Homarus americanus and other decapod crustacea. In: Duffy JE, Thiel M (eds) Evolutionary ecology of social and sexual systems. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 115–144

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Backwell PRY, Christy JH, Telford SR, Jennions MD, Passmore NI (2000) Dishonest signaling in a fiddler crab. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:719–724

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Backwell PRY, Jennions MD, Christy JH, Schober UM (1995) Pillar building in the fiddler crab Uca beebei: evidence for a condition-dependent ornament. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 36:185–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bamber SD, Naylor E (1996) Chemical communication and behavioural interaction between sexually mature male and female shore crabs (Carcinus maenas). J Mar Biol Assoc UK 76:691–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bamber SD, Naylor E (1997) Sites of release of putative sex pheromone and sexual behaviour in female Carcinus maenas (Crustacea: Decapoda). Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 44:195–202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berglund A, Bisazza A, Pilastro A (1996) Armaments and ornaments: an evolutionary explanation of traits of dual utility. Biol J Linn Soc 58:385–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergman DA, Martin AL, Moore PA (2005) Control of information flow through the influence of mechanical and chemical signals during agonistic encounters by the crayfish, Orconectes rusticus. Anim Behav 70:485–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL (2000) Economic models of animal communication. Anim Behav 59:259–268

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Breithaupt T, Atema J (2000) The timing of chemical signaling with urine in dominance fights of male lobsters (Homarus americanus). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 49:67–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breithaupt T, Eger P (2002) Urine makes the difference: chemical communication in fighting crayfish made visible. J Exp Biol 205:1221–1231

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Briffa M (2006) Signal residuals during shell fighting in hermit crabs: can costly signals be used deceptively? Behav Ecol 17:510–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bushmann PJ (1999) Concurrent signals and behavioral plasticity in Blue crab (Callinectes sapidus Rathbun) courtship. Biol Bull 197:63–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bublitz R, Sainte-Marie B, Newcomb-Hodgetts C, Fletcher N, Smith M, Hardege J (2008) Interspecific activity of the sex pheromone of the European shore crab (Carcinus maenas). Behaviour 145:1465–1478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell RL (1986) The deceptive use of reputation by stomatopods. In: Mitchell RW, Thompson NS (eds) Deception, perspectives on human and nonhuman deceit. State University of New York Press, Albany, pp 129–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Cremer S, D’Ettorre P, Drijfhout FP, Sledge MF, Truillazzi S, Heinze J (2008) Imperfect chemical female mimicry in males of the ant Cardiocondyla obscurior. Naturwissenschaften 95:1101–1105

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Christy JH (1980) The mating system of the sand fiddler crab Uca pugilator. Ph.D. thesis, Cornell University

    Google Scholar 

  • Christy JH (1995) Mimicry, mate choice and the sensory trap hypothesis. Am Nat 146:171–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christy JH (1997) Deception: the correct path to enlightenment? Trends Ecol Evol 12:160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christy JH (2007) Predation and the reproductive behavior of fiddler crabs (genus Uca). In: Thiel M, Duffy JE (eds) Evolution of social behavior of crustaceans. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 211–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Christy JH, Salmon M (1991) Comparative studies of reproductive behavior in mantis shrimps and fiddler crabs. Amer Zool 31:329–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Correa C, Baeza JA, Dupré E, Hinojosa IA, Thiel M (2000) Mating behavior and fertilization success of three ontogenetic stages of male rock shrimp Rhynchocinetes typus (Decapoda: Caridea). J Crust Biol 20:628–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Correa C, Baeza JA, Hinojosa IA, Thiel M (2003) Male dominance hierarchy and mating tactics in the rock shrimp Rhynchocinetes typus (Decapoda: Caridea). J Crust Biol 23:33–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickinson GH, Vega IE, Wahl KJ, Orihuela B, Beyley V, Rodriguez EN, Everett RK, Bonaventura J, Rittschof D (2009) Barnacle cement: a polymerization model based on evolutionary concepts. J Exp Biol 212:3499–3510

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy JE, Thiel M (2007) Evolutionary ecology of social and sexual systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Emlen DJ (2008) The evolution of animal weapons. An Rev Ecol System 39:387–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi F, Tricarico E, Atema J (2005) Unraveling the nature of individual recognition by odor in hermit crabs. J Chem Ecol 31:2877–2896

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hardege JD, Jennings A, Hayden D, Müller CT, Pascoe D, Bentley MG, Clare AS (2002) Novel behavioural assay and partial purification of a female-derived sex pheromone in Carcinus maenas. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 244:179–189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harper DGC (2006) Maynard Smith: amplifying the reasons for signal reliability. J Theor Biol 239:203–209

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hasson O (1994) Cheating signals. J Theor Biol 167:223–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazlett BA (1969) “Individual” recognition and agonistic behavior in Pagurus bernhardus. Nature 222:268–269

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hebets EA, Papaj DR (2005) Complex signal function: developing a framework for testable hypotheses. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 57:197–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes M (1996) Size assessment via a visual signal in snapping shrimp. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 38:51–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes M (2000) Deception with honest signals: signal residuals and signal function in snapping shrimp. Behav Ecol 11:614–623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jennions MD, Backwell PRY (1996) Residency and size affect fight duration and outcome in the fiddler crab Uca annulipes. Biol J Linn Soc 57:293–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Jivoff P, Hines AH (1998) Effect of female molt stage and sex ratio on courtship behavior of the blue crab Callinectes sapidus. Mar Biol 131:533–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone RA, Grafen M (1992) Error-prone signaling. Proc Royal Soc Lond B 248:229–233

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone RA, Grafen M (1993) Dishonesty and the handicap principle. Anim Behav 46:759–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamio M, Matsunaga S, Fusetani N (2000) Studies on sex pheromones of the helmet crab, Telmessus cheiragonus 1. An assay based on precopulatory mate-guarding. Zool Sci 17:731–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamio M, Reidenbach MA, Derby CD (2008) To paddle or not: context dependent courtship display by male blue crabs, Callinectes sapidus. J Exp Biol 211:1243–1248

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karavanich C, Atema J (1998) Individual recognition and memory in lobster dominance. Anim Behav 56:1553–1560

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kim TW, Christy JH, Choe JC (2007) A preference for a sexual signal keeps females safe. PLoS ONE 2(5):e422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kim TW, Christy JH, Dennenmoser S, Choe J (2009) The strength of a female mate preference increases with predation risk. Proc Royal Soc Lond B 276:775–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim TW, Christy JH, Rissanen JR, Ribeiro PD, Choe J (2010) The effect of food addition on the reproductive intensity and timing of both sexes of an intertidal crab. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 401:183–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuris AM, Ra’anan Z, Sagi A, Cohen D (1987) Morphotypic differentiation of male Malyasian giant prawns, Marcobrachium rosenbergii. J Crust Biol 7:219–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laidre ME (2009) How often do animals lie about their intentions? An experimental test. Am Nat 173:337–346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lailvaux SP, Reaney LT, Backwell PRY (2009) Dishonest signaling of fighting ability and multiple performance traits in the fiddler crab Uca mjoebergi. Funct Ecol 23:359–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Layne JE (1998) Retinal location is the key to identifying predators in fiddler crabs (Uca pugilator). J Exp Biol 201:2253–2261

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mahon JE (2007) A definition of deceiving. Int J Appl Phil 21:181–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsumura K, Hills JM, Thomason PO, Thomason JC, Clare AS (2000) Discrimination at settlement in barnacles: laboratory and field experiments on settlement behaviour in response to settlement-inducing protein complexes. Biofouling 16:181–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J, Harper D (2003) Animal signals. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell RW (1986) A framework for discussion deception. In: Mitchell RW, Thompson NS (eds) Deception, perspectives on human and nonhuman deceit. State University of New York Press, Albany, pp 3–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Ra’anan Z, Sagi A (1985) Alternative mating strategies in male morphotypes of the freshwater prawn Macrobrachium rosenbergii. Biol Bull 169:592–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rittschof D, Cohen JH (2004) Crustacean peptide and peptide-like pheromones and kairomones. Peptides 25:1503–1516

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg MS (2001) The systematics and taxonomy of fiddler crabs: a phylogeny of the genus Uca. J Crust Biol 21:839–869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmon M (1987) On the reproductive behavior of the fiddler crab Uca thayeri, with comparisons to U. pugilator and U. vocans: evidence for behavioral convergence. J Crust Biol 7:25–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sainte-Marie B (2007) Sperm demand and allocation in decapods crustaceans. In: Duffy JE, Thiel M (eds) Evolutionary ecology of social and sexual systems. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 191–210

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Scott-Phillips TC (2008) Defining biological communication. J Evol Biol 21:387–395

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Searcy WA, Nowicki S (2005) The evolution of animal communication, reliability and deception in signaling systems. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman PW, Reeve HK, Pfennig DW (1997) Recognition systems. In: Krebs JR, Davies NB (eds) Behavioural ecology: an evolutionary approach. Blackwell Scientific, Cambridge, pp 69–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Shih H, Mok H, Chang H (2005) Chimney building by male Uca formosensis Rathbun, 1921 (Crustacea: Decapoda: Ocypodidae) after pairing: a new hypothesis for chimney function. Zool Studies 44:242–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Slatyer RA, Fok ESY, Hocking R, Backwell PRY (2008) Why do fiddler crabs build chimneys? Biol Letters 4:616–618

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wada K, Murata I (2000) Chimney building in the fiddler crab Uca arcuata. J Crust Biol 20:505–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiley RH (1994) Errors, exaggerations and deception in animal communication. In: Real LA (ed) Behavioural mechanisms in evolutionary ecology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 157–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson RS, Angilletta MJ Jr, James RS, Navas C, Seebacher F (2007) Dishonest signals of strength in male slender crayfish (Cherax dispar) during agonistic encounters. Am Nat 170:284–291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson RS, James RS, Bywater C, Seebacher F (2009) Costs and benefits of increased weapon size differ between sexes of the slender crayfish, Cherax dispar. J Exp Biol 212:853–858

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zeil J, Layne JE (2002) Path integration in fiddler crabs and its relation to habitat and social life. In: Wiese K (ed) Crustacean experimental systems in neurobiology. Springer, Berlin, pp 227–246

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Martin Thiel and Thomas Breithaupt for their guidance, helpful criticism, and especially their patience. J. Christy thanks Pat Backwell for freely sharing ideas and for her expert assistance in field studies of visual deception in fiddler crabs. D. Rittschof thanks Sarah McCall, Zach Darnell, Kelly Darnell, and Ruth McDowell for the quality time in the field with sexually receptive blue crabs.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Balboa, Republic of Panama

    John H. Christy

Authors
  1. John H. Christy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dan Rittschof
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John H. Christy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. Biological Sciences, University of Hull, Hull, HU6 7RX, United Kingdom

    Thomas Breithaupt

  2. Facultad Ciencas del Mar, Depto. de Biología Marina, Universidad Catolica del Norte, Larondo 1281, Coquimbo, Chile

    Martin Thiel

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media, LLC

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Christy, J.H., Rittschof, D. (2010). Deception in Visual and Chemical Communication in Crustaceans. In: Breithaupt, T., Thiel, M. (eds) Chemical Communication in Crustaceans. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77101-4_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation